[07:22:45] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:FunkMonk]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations]] ( /* Convention for eliminating old nominations where nominators aren't active */ ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=911951132
[07:50:47] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Lee Vilenski]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations]] ( /* Convention for eliminating old nominations where nominators aren't active */ comment ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=911953273
[17:27:39] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Al83tito]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good articles]] ( /* When several inline citations are placed together, do they need to (re)arranged according to their numbering? */ new section ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=912012548
[17:47:40] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:RL0919]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good articles]] ( /* When several inline citations are placed together, do they need to (re)arranged according to their numbering? */ re ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=912015101
[17:50:57] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Barkeep49]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good articles]] ( /* When several inline citations are placed together, do they need to (re)arranged according to their numbering? */ my thoughts ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=912015509
[18:04:08] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:David Fuchs]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good articles]] ( /* When several inline citations are placed together, do they need to (re)arranged according to their numbering? */ ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=912017170
[19:21:50] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Kees08]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good articles]] ( /* When several inline citations are placed together, do they need to (re)arranged according to their numbering? */ ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=912026577