[08:45:12] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Chiswick Chap]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article criteria]] ( /* Criterion #2 Doesn't seem to actually require everything to be cited */ no, that's overstated ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=909128459
[17:08:23] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Redrose64]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article criteria]] ( /* Criterion #2 Doesn't seem to actually require everything to be cited */ do you want to send [[NBR 224 and 420 Classes]] to [[WP:GAR]] then? ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=909176366
[17:36:43] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Chiswick Chap]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article criteria]] ( /* Criterion #2 Doesn't seem to actually require everything to be cited */ ah, you've not understood, added a note ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=909179819
[19:48:57] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Czar]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article criteria]] ( /* Discussion */ unindent non-reply; note re WP:SS link ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=909195279
[23:17:56] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Wugapodes]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article criteria]] ( /* 1a proposal */ proposal updated per David and XOReaster, pinging all participants to give it another look ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=909218026
[23:19:18] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Iazyges]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article criteria]] ( /* Discussion */ ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=909218160
[23:19:59] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Wugapodes]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good articles]] ( /* RfC on GA criteria change */ new section ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=909218236
[23:24:09] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Wugapodes]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article criteria]] ( /* 1a proposal */ also posted a not at [[WT:GA]], probably worth keeping open the full 30 days ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=909218703