[14:40:15] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Prhartcom]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations]] ( /* Re: Aelia Eudocia article review */ Reply. ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=732521710
[14:51:08] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Mr rnddude]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations]] ( /* Re: Aelia Eudocia article review */ Well alright then, not a problem ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=732523111
[15:51:26] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Llywrch]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations]] ( response ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=732530657
[15:59:35] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:Mr rnddude]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations]] ( /* Re: Aelia Eudocia article review */ Yeah, same ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=732531657
[20:50:33] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:MSJapan]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations]] ( /* Konnan */ new section ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=732571631
[21:44:21] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:BlueMoonset]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations]] ( /* Konnan */ reply to MSJapan: reassessment is already under way ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=732578872
[22:09:09] <wm-bot4>	 [[User:MSJapan]] modified [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations]] ( /* Konnan */  - reply ) ▶ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/?diff=732581901