[13:02:19] <wm-bot3>	 I will let you know when I see infobliss around here
[13:02:19] <zhuyifei1999_>	 @notify infobliss
[13:49:13] <infobliss>	 hi
[13:49:56] <zhuyifei1999_>	 infobliss: although I don't require the fully-fledged commit messages, mind not using github default "Update blah"?
[13:50:08] <zhuyifei1999_>	 it's literally meaningless
[13:50:24] <infobliss>	 for minor changes like spelling changes?
[13:50:44] <zhuyifei1999_>	 then say "fix spelling" etc.
[13:51:03] <infobliss>	 ok
[13:51:17] <zhuyifei1999_>	 you don't have to specify what spelling is fixed, but point out the general change
[13:51:27] <infobliss>	 ok
[13:52:57] <infobliss>	 next thing I was supposed work on is to show specific forms on choosing specific glams
[13:53:15] <zhuyifei1999_>	 hmm. all we need is an id right?
[13:53:18] <infobliss>	 but now after yesterday's discussion I am not sure if it will be required
[13:53:30] <infobliss>	 yes
[13:54:26] <zhuyifei1999_>	 have you decided on my yesterday's question [15:25:23] <zhuyifei1999_>	 the OOP question is still 23:10 <zhuyifei1999_> think about this: what should each instance represent?
[13:55:03] <infobliss>	 I am thinkinh
[13:56:59] <infobliss>	 may be each instance represents an object with one glam's metadata in wikitext form
[13:57:35] <zhuyifei1999_>	 wikitext is string
[13:57:51] <infobliss>	 yes
[13:58:45] <zhuyifei1999_>	 unless you want to subclass the glam classes to string, that doesn't make sense imo
[14:00:01] <infobliss>	 I mean each instance is capable of doing the metadata mapping for the specific glam
[14:00:16] <zhuyifei1999_>	 you have a class for eash glam
[14:00:36] <zhuyifei1999_>	 so essencially you are suggesting that each class shall have only one instance
[14:00:55] <zhuyifei1999_>	 like singletons (did I spell that correctly)
[14:01:10] <infobliss>	 yeah
[14:02:07] <zhuyifei1999_>	 well, in that case how would oop benefit compared to a bunch of functions?
[14:02:37] <zhuyifei1999_>	 or a-bunch-of-functions-in-a-dict
[14:03:24] <infobliss>	 good point
[14:03:29] <infobliss>	 let me think
[14:03:40] <zhuyifei1999_>	 creating a bunch of functions and a singleton is not the point of OOP
[14:05:04] <infobliss>	 in fact all we need is: one function for metadata mapping per glam
[14:05:38] <zhuyifei1999_>	 nope :P
[14:06:09] <zhuyifei1999_>	 a. nobody wants to see a gigantic all-in-one function 
[14:06:27] <zhuyifei1999_>	 b. you still wants to try extract id from url
[14:07:36] <zhuyifei1999_>	 a sec
[14:07:52] <infobliss>	 c. one function for generating a suitable image filename
[14:08:44] <zhuyifei1999_>	 http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/flinfo.php
[14:08:57] <zhuyifei1999_>	 you might want to look into this tool
[14:09:08] <zhuyifei1999_>	 it generates wikitext by url
[14:09:19] <zhuyifei1999_>	 https://gitlab.com/flinfo/flinfo
[14:09:40] <infobliss>	 ok
[14:10:16] <zhuyifei1999_>	 it's php thougj
[14:10:21] <zhuyifei1999_>	 *though
[14:10:47] <infobliss>	 i see
[14:10:54] <zhuyifei1999_>	 (which is one of the languages I hate)
[14:11:14] <infobliss>	 mediawiki is also php
[14:11:41] <zhuyifei1999_>	 meh
[14:12:00] <zhuyifei1999_>	 nobody has the time to rewrite mediawiki
[14:12:50] <zhuyifei1999_>	 I once gave a link to someone else trying to convince them that php is bad. let me find it
[14:14:56] <zhuyifei1999_>	 https://eev.ee/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/
[14:15:53] <infobliss>	 alright got it
[14:16:05] <zhuyifei1999_>	 ?
[14:17:43] <infobliss>	 I mean reading through the blog it's apparent what's wrong with php
[14:18:10] <infobliss>	 and also
[14:18:37] <infobliss>	 it's philosophy says that "PHP was originally designed explicitly for non-programmers."
[14:18:50] <zhuyifei1999_>	 lol
[14:20:59] <infobliss>	 i think it's well organised code though
[14:21:15] <zhuyifei1999_>	 you mean flinfo?
[14:21:18] <zhuyifei1999_>	 yeah
[14:21:18] <infobliss>	 i mean the code of flinfo
[14:22:29] <infobliss>	 but i get lost
[14:22:37] <infobliss>	 too many files :P
[14:23:11] <zhuyifei1999_>	 you can stick to https://gitlab.com/flinfo/flinfo/blob/master/flinfo/code/FlinfoFlickr.php
[14:23:17] <zhuyifei1999_>	 this one does flickr
[14:23:38] <infobliss>	 ok let me check
[14:26:02] <zhuyifei1999_>	 also https://gitlab.com/flinfo/flinfo/blob/master/flinfo/code/FlinfoWiki.php
[14:26:11] <zhuyifei1999_>	 looks like main code
[14:31:38] <infobliss>	 ok
[15:40:57] * zhuyifei1999_ can't believe I'm still reading that php blog
[15:57:14] <infobliss>	 hahaha
[15:57:24] <infobliss>	 I just came from dinner.
[16:03:55] <zhuyifei1999_>	 phew... done
[16:04:30] <infobliss>	 :)
[17:07:33] <infobliss>	 good night zhuyifei. tomorrow I will inform you regarding my study of flinfo.
[17:07:42] <zhuyifei1999_>	 k
[17:07:46] <infobliss>	 going for watching a movie now
[17:07:49] <infobliss>	 :)
[17:08:07] <zhuyifei1999_>	 which one? just curious?
[17:08:13] <infobliss>	 spiderman
[17:08:23] <zhuyifei1999_>	 ok
[17:08:40] <infobliss>	 have you watched?
[17:08:51] <infobliss>	 asking just for reviews
[17:08:54] <zhuyifei1999_>	 not 100% sure
[17:09:05] <infobliss>	 no it's the new release
[17:09:12] <zhuyifei1999_>	 no
[17:09:16] <infobliss>	 "spiderman homecoming"
[17:09:27] <infobliss>	 ok
[17:10:21] <zhuyifei1999_>	 I prefer those movies like "Interstellar" or "Inception"
[17:10:36] <zhuyifei1999_>	 and those like "The Lord of the Rings"
[17:12:08] <infobliss>	 ok some sci fi and nice concepts 
[17:12:25] <zhuyifei1999_>	 nice concepts?
[17:12:35] <infobliss>	 inception
[17:12:43] <infobliss>	 dream within dream
[17:12:49] <zhuyifei1999_>	 yeah
[17:12:57] <zhuyifei1999_>	 the same director
[17:13:10] <infobliss>	 also lord of the rings is beauty :)
[17:13:16] <infobliss>	 the concept too
[17:13:19] <infobliss>	 yeah
[17:13:29] <zhuyifei1999_>	 well, I read the books as well
[17:14:00] <infobliss>	 wow zhuyifei1999_ 
[17:14:11] <infobliss>	 those are really fat books
[17:14:22] <zhuyifei1999_>	 lol