[01:07:34] Connection refused seems unrelated to id_rsa [01:08:18] but yes you have to use the same id_rsa unless you upload your new public key to wikitech [11:13:24] Hello everyone I have checked that the python documentation of the codes is mostly up-to-date except app.py [11:14:29] I can write comments there if need be but I observed that similar files where routes are defined are not commented in v2c [11:14:44] so not sure whether to go ahead with commenting [11:15:24] As suggested by everyone of late I have been focussing more on how to make the tool scalable [11:16:17] also there's some accessability issue with my machine and hence I am migrating to a new machine [11:16:49] so it requires setting up configuration properly to be able to ssh to tool labs etc. [13:15:59] infobliss: feel free to leace a message if you have trouble setting things up [13:16:06] *leave [13:47:40] hi [13:56:30] hi infobliss [13:57:10] hello [13:57:54] are you still having trouble sshing into tool labs? [13:58:21] yes I got the same error [13:58:46] I have decided to install a new virtual box in a new system [13:59:10] what's the output of $ host -v login.tools.wmflabs.org [13:59:11] ? [13:59:56] my working machine has become useless. it has some session related issue. It's unable to start the session on login. [14:00:12] o.O [14:00:18] and the other machine I have is a desktop in the lab [14:00:44] I am in my hostel now trying to get things working in a different laptop [14:01:21] I will issue this command once I go to the lab. [14:01:53] if necessary you can reinstall the os on your working machine [14:02:00] k [14:02:17] won't reinstalling remove all data? [14:02:28] it depends [14:04:07] I mean it depends on what os it is, how the volumes are mounted, how you reinstall, etc. [14:04:18] and you can always do a backup [14:05:18] all I can do now is access the console by doing ctrl+f1 [14:05:48] well, if that's the case you can perform a backup from the console [14:05:58] yeah [14:06:46] but I have a different machine with more disk space [14:07:16] so I am thinking of making that one the new working machine [14:07:24] k [14:09:56] @basvb do you want discuss something? [14:12:33] not per se, I'll be off for 5 days, then I will be back for a bit and then off again [14:12:52] So we've to see what your plans are for the following 2 weeks [14:12:52] okay [14:13:28] I was wondering, how many time you're able to put into the project until now? Per day/week [14:13:30] I will make things scalable [14:13:35] in the lines of youtube-dl [14:14:30] well it's min 40 hours a week. I am solely focussing on this project. [14:18:59] ok, you've been able to put those in? I'm asking because I want to be able to estimate which part in the following month need the focus and which maybe should be last on the priority list [14:19:57] I think yes [14:20:17] ok [14:54:29] Ok Infobliss, we went over the evaluation. [14:54:57] :) [14:54:59] We think you are doing a good job overall, you're very enthousiastic about the project [14:55:36] and as such the evaluation will (of course) be a pass [14:56:00] The evaluation moment is also a good moment to look at what things we can improve a bit on [14:56:10] thank you so much. [14:56:19] yes of course [14:57:00] I think that there are two points which we should mind: on the one side that is keeping focus on the correct things to keep progress going in the right direction [14:57:07] and on the other side that's code quality [14:58:07] For both points I think it would be good to increase our communication moments a bit, instead of doing a weekly discussion we should try to commicate every day or every other day [14:58:33] well that's absolutely right. It will be easier that way. [14:58:50] in fact zhuyifei was almost always available [14:59:04] with me going on a vacation the timing isn't too perfect for that from my side. [14:59:05] his response time was fastest :) [14:59:11] * zhuyifei1999_ is supposed to be zzzing right now :) [15:00:01] I think you should try to have a daily communication with zhuyifei1999_ (in the next to weeks, but maybe also after that if it works good) more during both your day times [15:00:43] But I'll leave that up to you two how that works best [15:00:43] yeah sure I will be in daily communication with him. [15:00:56] just give your input on what you are working on, what you are stuck with [15:01:01] from 3-6 july I'll likely be hanging around here quite a bit as well [15:01:27] and from 15th on I should be here every evening for a bit [15:01:46] because it's also partly my inavailability which is to blame [15:01:59] you have always kept the momentum going :) [15:02:16] it's 20:30 for you now, correct? [15:02:26] yep [15:02:39] what time do you stop normally?/Go to sleep? [15:02:59] I work till late night. Sleep after 12. [15:03:06] because for me I'm mostly available at 20:00-23:00, so that's from 23:30 for you [15:03:07] in between I have dinner. [15:03:11] aah ok [15:03:44] yeah that's fin [15:03:45] fine [15:03:59] so I'll commit to be here from 23:30-00:30 your time (after that is also possible but let's not drag the days too long) [15:04:40] ok we'll manage :) [15:04:47] then we won't have the 3 person meetings, but we can use the logs as well [15:04:55] 3-4 person of course [15:05:14] zhuyifei is probably 2 hours ahead of me [15:05:40] * zhuyifei1999_ 's time is 23:05 now [15:05:45] yep, so that would be too late to be there at the times I'm here on a default basis [15:06:03] ok so about the focus and code quality [15:06:16] and I prefer before 20:00 (afterwards I might get sleepy) [15:06:31] We think it's important for next week to focus on code quality and scalability [15:06:33] @zhuyifei 2.5 hours ahead then [15:06:52] get the code to work for the general case (every glam) not the specific case (one glam) [15:07:26] on the side you can start working on the june 30- july 5 plan: "June 30 to July 5 Work to make the tool have the ability to provide the flexibility of choosing a number of desired files (may be by providing checkboxes against the image thumbnails) and quickly upload them to Commons (may be by a single click button)" [15:07:34] but that shouldn't be too high of a focus [15:07:45] because that will be pretty difficult [15:08:04] It's important to first get what we have now in a bit better shape [15:08:47] and I think you and zhuyifei1999_ can discuss that on a more day to day basis? Which parts of the code to look at/need the attention [15:09:51] yeah [15:10:35] also "by providing checkboxes against the image thumbnail" will require consent from the glam [15:11:15] we can try that out. In fact I am very eager to make that happen. [15:11:33] why? you can just show the thumbnails (they are cc licensed) [15:12:37] ok you mean fetch the images into our tool and show the thumbnails? [15:12:57] not having a button directly in the glam's site [15:13:05] if possible, you can test around with that a bit, but focus on the code quality and scalability [15:13:26] no not on the glams site, that for we rely on the glam [15:13:26] alright I will focus there. [15:13:38] you don't "fetch" them. you embed a tag [15:13:44] you can test if you can easily embed them [15:14:13] @zhuyifei ok [15:15:56] I will have to go for dinner in a few minutes. [15:17:10] yes I'm off now as well [15:17:21] see you next week [15:17:37] ok see you again next week :) [15:18:13] I am going offline for now.