[06:54:32] Yes, I was planning to join you on point 1 (I should also get familiar with tool labs) ;) [06:55:02] http://wm-bot.wmflabs.org/logs/%23wikimedia-sibu/ [06:55:04] and point 2 I can help you with any questions + maybe we can have a bit more focus on the pitfalls of large content donations and copyright [06:56:08] wow the logging is on. [06:56:53] We should also make some arrangements for meetings on set days + times we try to commit to [06:57:48] yes we had a talk regarding this just now. [06:57:52] I think you'll almost always find one of us here, but I think it is good to try to have 1 time a week where all 4 of us try to be here [06:58:05] yes sure. [06:58:45] what time is preferable? [06:59:09] something on friday-sunday is optimal for me, as EU daytime is not really an option due to work [06:59:26] I'm 8-15 UTC weekends, 10-15 UTC weekdays [06:59:56] I need a 2 minutes break. Somebody is at the door. [07:00:01] * zhuyifei1999_ needs to setup wm-bot permissions [07:00:03] I am going to be back. [07:00:34] tom29739: what times would be possible for you during the weekends? [07:01:06] I think we'll get that answer in some hours [07:01:11] Not sure. [07:01:26] Successfully added .*@wikipedia/tom29739 [07:01:26] @trustadd .*@wikipedia/tom29739 admin [07:01:33] ow I was thinking you were still asleep;) I was so early today [07:01:34] basvb: do you have an irc cloak? [07:01:43] I trust: zhuyifei1999_!.*@wikimedia/zhuyifei1999 (2admin), .*@wikipedia/tom29739 (2admin), [07:01:43] @trusted [07:01:54] I wouldn't normally be on at this time, but I have some stuff to do. [07:01:56] not sure, basvb is my account I log in with but I use freenode [07:02:04] (um okay I guess I can stick to this username) [07:02:11] zhuyifei1999_, * [basvb] (b255d421@wikipedia/Basvb): 178-85-212-33.dynamic.upc.nl/178.85.212.33 [07:02:13] however I don't mind not being an admin [07:02:34] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC/Cloaks [07:02:49] tom29739: that's the host :P [07:03:01] I was thinking something on friday, saturday, sunday around 12-15 is ideal [07:03:11] sure [07:03:16] "@wikipedia/Basvb" - that isn't his cloak? [07:03:36] i think it is [07:03:39] hi [07:03:46] but freenode still shows IP-adresses [07:03:59] oh right I didn't see that [07:04:14] Successfully added .*@wikipedia/Basvb [07:04:14] @trustadd .*@wikipedia/Basvb admin [07:04:36] The freenode web chat shows your IP in the realname field even if you're cloaked. [07:04:40] What happened to djff? [07:04:54] see phabricator chat [07:05:05] see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/Z527 [07:05:12] something went wrong with contacting the university [07:05:21] for 3 students from the same uni [07:07:14] "friday, saturday, sunday around 12-15 is ideal" - works fine for me. [07:07:35] well lets pick one of those ;) [07:07:48] tom29739? [07:07:59] friday [07:08:52] I sometimes have other meetings on friday 13-15 UTC [07:09:12] I'm busy on Friday and Saturday at those times. [07:09:31] I can do later on Friday. [07:10:11] I think sunday is a good idea, it's the easiest out of the three for me as well [07:10:20] later is difficult with the time zones [07:10:41] ok sure. [07:12:24] I'm the easiest on Saturday, but I can do Sunday (not too much difference) [07:13:38] sundays 13:00 UTC I would propose [07:13:48] sure [07:14:30] works for me. [07:22:44] another thing to start with is get some structure in what has to be done on Phabricator (tasks for all the substeps in the project) [07:23:01] as it will give us some guidance [07:23:12] yeah [07:23:15] ok [07:23:47] but that's something best done with some discussion as it will also be part of forming the exact plan [07:24:48] basvb you had created a task "MVP for Single Image Batch Upload" [07:25:03] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T161331 [07:25:04] Yep [07:25:54] Shall we add subtasks to this task? [07:26:01] I think best is to focus on 3 sprints (each month and their respective evaluation) [07:26:11] and this would be one of the main tasks for sprint 1 [07:29:25] to begin with one task could be [07:29:32] 1. Build a simple tool and host it in the tool labs. [07:30:02] so that I can get myself familiar with the tool labs. [07:31:19] Yep, but then I would be interested in what that simple tool entails [07:32:25] Maybe that tool just makes a call to a GLAM APi or maybe it entails some flask code [07:32:41] but I think we can work a bit on these tasks together on a later moment [07:32:49] I now have to work for a few hours [07:33:02] I'll be listening in here a bit, but focus on my work [07:33:14] to start with can we just have a tool that allows image upload from local disk? [07:33:58] infobliss_: believe it or not, upload from local disk can be more complicated than the final product [07:34:30] ... or not ... depending on how you support it [07:35:03] oh is it? I am humbled :) [07:35:52] if the file upload is done via plain http it will be simpler, but it will not be able to async or support chunked uploads [07:36:20] I think you can try the former if you want (plain http upload) [07:38:21] okay [07:39:27] chunked uploads can be avoided since we only upload small sized files (images). [07:40:13] yeah [07:40:48] although fot the very final product you may meed very large images from glams that must be chunked-uploaded [07:40:51] *for [07:41:12] okay [07:41:35] eg. gigapixels like https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Elisa_Bonaparte_with_her_daughter_Napoleona_Baciocchi_-_Fran%C3%A7ois_G%C3%A9rard_-_Google_Cultural_Institute.jpg [07:42:00] (the image is so large that JPG format simply cannot support its size) [07:42:04] from when on is chunked uploads necessary? [07:42:18] 100MB [07:42:35] even more. [07:43:00] idk if it's 100*2^20 or 100*10^6 [07:43:42] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Maximum_file_size ah 100MiB [07:43:47] so the former [07:44:05] okk [16:34:24] basvb: I just saw https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Susannaanas/GLAMpipe [16:34:36] would that be somewhat related? [17:31:08] Aah yes zhuyifei1999_ I saw that a little while ago [17:31:59] the tool is focussed on power users, but I should definitely look into it a bit better [17:32:07] k [17:32:25] susan was also interested in our project, at least subscribed to the phabricator task [17:33:45] We (or me) have to define our scope a little better as well, nemo_bis made some points of which some are valid [17:34:03] the tool will mainly support a work flow where manual work per image would be needed [17:34:03] yeah [17:34:25] e.g. categorising or a collection where not everything is free because of derivative work [17:34:56] so there should be some specific instructions for the users using the tool which could differ per collection I think