[04:39:26] 10serviceops, 10Operations: Chaos Engineering - Stop for x hours one or more mc10xx memcached shards - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T251378 (10Joe) @elukey let's schedule this test for 6:00Z on monday, May 11th? [08:24:19] 10serviceops, 10Operations, 10Continuous-Integration-Config: docker-reporter-releng-images failed on deneb - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T251918 (10MoritzMuehlenhoff) >>! In T251918#6109976, @hashar wrote: > Do you have details as to why the releng/bazel:0.4.0 fails? No, what's I opened a task so that... [08:39:20] 10serviceops, 10Operations, 10Traffic: Certificate *.wikipedia.org valid until 2020-06-20 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T251726 (10Dzahn) revert: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/594672 [12:09:00] 10serviceops, 10Continuous-Integration-Infrastructure, 10Patch-For-Review, 10Release-Engineering-Team (CI & Testing services), 10Test-Coverage: Upgrade our php-xdebug package for php7.2 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T234418 (10hashar) I have filed it to Debian upstream since Buster is affected: htt... [14:55:53] hi all mwdebug1001 has an none puppitised 'block-memcached' iptables chain. I belive this is something eff.ie was working on. is it still needed? if so will it get puppetised or is it intended for some type of dynamic rule set [14:56:11] not it will obvioulsy be lost if someone restarts ferm or the box [14:56:17] *note [14:56:19] cc _joe_ [14:57:11] <_joe_> jbond42: no it's a leftover from me, it can be removed [14:57:20] thanks [15:17:49] _joe_: actually, moving this question out of our PM -- we might want a clearer name than "local-memcache" given that we already use "local" to mean same-DC [15:17:51] on-host memcache? [15:18:46] or we could try to rebrand the other thing as "regional memcache" but I don't think it would stick [15:19:10] loopback memcache? [15:26:24] 10serviceops, 10Operations: Update php-xdebug to 2.9.2 in apt.wm.o component/php72 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T244716 (10jgleeson) Hi folks, could we get this added to our repo? [15:30:17] <_joe_> one would hope we could speak to it via a socket from mcrouter [15:30:40] <_joe_> but rzl: I'm really really bad at naming, I won't be of much help [15:57:25] <_joe_> rzl: I see https://github.com/facebook/mcrouter/issues/208 but no idea if that's available in our version [15:57:48] I think you and I looked at this in Rome, I'd forgotten about it [15:58:13] the config we wanted was "plaintext via socket but SSL via port" and I think that wasn't supported [15:58:31] you could have a socket, or two ports, but not a combination [15:58:33] <_joe_> no we looked at allowing mcrouter to listen on socket [15:58:44] ohh [15:58:49] <_joe_> here I'm looking at making the loopback memcached to listen on a socket [15:59:00] yeah okay, sure [15:59:31] I have it down as "127.0.0.1:11211:ascii:plain" because I am lazy, but I'll check that out [15:59:48] <_joe_> tbh, I didn't think of it until now [16:58:18] rzl: names: loopback, standalone, host, colocated, socket (if you use that, to be shortened to 'somem') [16:58:24] I can go on with horrible names :D [16:58:44] and to be clear, that's the list of names to avoid ;) [17:00:13] perfect, thanks, I'll rotate between using all those names in different places [17:01:57] (I'm sticking with "onhost") [17:02:00] *on-host [17:11:16] 10serviceops, 10Operations: Reduce read pressure on memcached servers by adding a machine-local Memcache instance - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T244340 (10RLazarus) a:03RLazarus