[00:15:28] AaronSchulz: No idea I assume? [00:19:16] Change merged: Faidon; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66026 [00:25:11] dr0ptp4kt: hey [00:25:27] hey there, paravoid. thanks for the review. [00:25:49] dr0ptp4kt: when I visit en.zero I'm getting a sorry banner which references a random IP [00:26:00] cached I'm guessing [00:26:15] paravoid, you able to do a quick google hangout? [00:26:21] not now [00:26:58] paravoid, ok. would you please send me the spoofed user agent and X-CS (and any other spoofed headers) plus the response? [00:27:11] just go to http://en.zero.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page [00:27:28] nothing's spoofed [00:27:31] just my browser :) [00:27:58] paravoid, oh, i see what you mean. try http://en.zero.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page?cachebuster=100 [00:28:09] I know that it works if you bypass caches [00:28:48] paravoid, do you know if there were any changes in cache variance lately? [00:29:32] dr0ptp4kt, come to think of it, that's the expected behaviour - if you visit zero from anywhere, it should tell you that you don't have zero, and tells you your IP addr [00:29:50] but because we cache everything, it will return the previously-cached banner [00:30:10] wasn't that the previous behaviour? [00:31:34] yurik, the "strange" (?) thing is that the IP address that's shown isn't mine. i seem to recall it would usually echo back my own ip address in the past, not something that was cached. [00:31:53] how was that possible? [00:32:09] it should have cached the banner including the ip [00:32:12] yurik, i wonder if it was just lucky happenstance due to x-device [00:32:41] one thing we could do is not to cache anything for zero [00:32:45] …yurik, coupled with the rarity of "normal" users hitting zero on their own. [00:32:48] unless x-cs is set [00:36:39] yurik, i think for the "Sorry" message we could also replace the page render with a 302 to a non-cacheable page. that way we can retain the cached pages for perf. [00:36:56] the non-cacheable page could display the "Sorry" message and the user's current IP address [00:37:02] yurik^ [00:37:22] how do you propose to do that? [00:37:38] not sure what you mean by non-cached page [00:38:18] paravoid, that patch to varnish didn't work for some reason - people at the office can't spoof their IPs :( [00:38:43] mark said that its due to IPv4 vs v6, but dr0ptp4kt couldn't spoof from the office [00:38:49] and was getting IPv4 error message [00:42:15] yurik, my thought is that if the user is redirected, for example, to /wiki/Special:ZeroRatedMobileAccess?notsupported=yes and if we can make //wiki/Special:ZeroRatedMobileAccess?notsupported=yes override the X-Vary-Options header, then we can inform the cache to always hit the origin for that path, meaning it should be possible to return the up-to-date IP address for that path. another less lovely option is to redirect the user to a page [00:42:16] a random value pegged into the redirect. but that results in unnecessary items cached. [00:42:56] er, supported=false :) [00:43:05] not, unsupported=true :) [00:46:36] agree about special page, not hard to make [00:46:47] dr0ptp4kt, but i don't know about the variance [00:46:56] variance on what? [00:47:07] i think we would need to set "don't cache" at all [00:47:43] New review: Dr0ptp4kt; "Going through ZeroRatedMobileAccess, the hook is being called for mobile sites anyway. The differenc..." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66034 [00:48:16] yurik, agreed, we'd have to tell it to never cache. [00:49:01] yurik, that's actually an interesting problem, which is similar to the s-maxage card. [00:49:14] yurik, i gotta run to catch a bug. have a good night! [00:49:22] yurik, s/bug/bus/ [00:49:48] dr0ptp4kt, #wikimedia-mobile [00:52:08] New review: Yurik; "X-CS will only be set for the known IPs, so even though we are increasing from zero only to zero and..." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66034 [00:55:58] New patchset: Yurik; "Removed carrier-specific filtering" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66034 [02:08:18] !log LocalisationUpdate completed (1.22wmf5) at Thu May 30 02:08:18 UTC 2013 [02:08:30] Logged the message, Master [02:14:49] !log LocalisationUpdate completed (1.22wmf4) at Thu May 30 02:14:49 UTC 2013 [02:14:58] Logged the message, Master [02:37:00] !log LocalisationUpdate ResourceLoader cache refresh completed at Thu May 30 02:37:00 UTC 2013 [02:37:09] Logged the message, Master [05:20:58] New review: ArielGlenn; "The mediawiki and stubs arguments are mandatory so they should not appear in brackets. See http://ww..." [operations/dumps] (ariel) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65706 [06:35:49] Hey all. [06:35:56] Back home! Need sleep! [08:14:59] New review: Mark Bergsma; "This looks like it will double the cache for carriers, because always setting X-CS necessarily also ..." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66034 [08:37:40] New review: Mark Bergsma; "This doubles the cache size for all carrier views. This can probably be handled in a better way." [operations/puppet] (production) C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66034 [09:27:37] Change abandoned: Hashar; "might revisit that later" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/59626 [09:27:37] Change abandoned: Hashar; "might revisit that later" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/59611 [09:30:07] New patchset: Hashar; "beta: syslog-ng on deployment-bastion host" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/51668 [09:30:49] New patchset: Hashar; "beta: symlink /a/common" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65254 [09:52:49] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Install cp1037-1040 as text Varnish" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66074 [09:54:34] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Install cp1037-1040 as text Varnish" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66074 [09:56:04] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66074 [10:14:26] mark: I guess I will migrate beta to use varnish as well :-] [10:14:46] yeah [10:14:50] can just ditch squid probably [10:16:11] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Add cp1037-1040 as Varnish text" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66077 [10:16:42] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66077 [10:18:33] !log mark synchronized wmf-config/squid.php 'Add cp1037-1040 as text Varnish' [10:18:44] Logged the message, Master [10:20:43] mark: did you get deployment-cache-text1.pmtpa.wmflabs working in beta ? [10:20:50] I should have stayed around during the hackaton sorry :( [10:21:37] uhm [10:21:48] yes ryan fixed the problem [10:22:02] but then I had trouble with the manifests and just went to production? [10:22:04] something like that [10:22:04] err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: $$$lvs::configuration::lvs_service_ips[$::realm]["text"][$::mw_primary] is not an hash or array when accessing it with textsvc at /etc/puppet/manifests/role/cache.pp:393 on node i-00000778.pmtpa.wmflabs [10:22:05] :D [10:22:10] yeah that [10:22:49] I had to make the cache class to use role::cache::configuration instead of lvs::configuration [10:23:03] and make the hash entries to point to lvs::configuration::* if and only if in prod [10:23:04] not ideal :( [10:23:28] not really no [10:23:44] but that is the only way to make them work until we get LVS in labs or a way to emulate it [10:24:15] we can just emulate LVS with a tcp proxy [10:24:23] :-D [10:24:25] (or we could make LVS work...) [10:26:42] perhaps we could just include part of the $lvs:: hash into the role::cache::configuration hash [10:32:36] yup I think I had to do that for the mobile class [10:37:51] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Fix the cluster_tier conditionals" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66079 [10:38:47] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66079 [10:45:21] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Point esams Varnish at eqiad Varnish instead of Squid" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66080 [10:46:17] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66080 [11:02:41] mark, good morning, any thoughts on how i could debug the varnish issue with xff spoofing from the office? [11:03:12] by reading the code and figuring out where it goes wrong? [11:03:16] or by testing it in labs [11:03:29] I tested it, it worked fine for me [11:03:33] from fenari/bast1001 [11:04:26] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Use individual eqiad backends instead of the LVS (Squid) service IP" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66082 [11:05:20] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66082 [11:11:14] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Add IPv6 address to amssq47" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66086 [11:12:29] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66086 [11:14:29] hello [11:14:35] is Faidon here ? [11:14:42] yes [11:14:44] hello paravoid [11:14:46] hi [11:14:48] what's up? [11:15:01] is git-buildpackage the norm in terms of making debian packages out of git repos ? [11:15:11] or can I use a custom built script I have ? [11:15:30] paravoid: this is in relation to https://mingle.corp.wikimedia.org/projects/analytics/cards/716 [11:17:04] paravoid: so basically my understanding is that Ops need to be able to build the package themselves. I am willing and capable of putting together any and all steps needed to create the package from Ops point of view. [11:17:19] paravoid: Question: does it matter if git-buildpackage is used or not in this process ? [11:17:40] git-buildpackage is the standard way of building a package out of git [11:17:52] what is libdclass-dev? [11:17:58] is it your own code? [11:18:02] someone else's? [11:18:18] I remember an RT ticket a while back where you pointed us to a .deb and nothing else [11:18:18] paravoid: someone else's, but it contains a JNI that drdee and me have worked on [11:18:37] so it's modified? [11:18:49] yes [11:18:54] i think we need two packages [11:19:04] yeah, so let's import it into git/gerrit and work there [11:19:13] paravoid: yes, I agree that RT ticket was somewhat incomplete, so today (with your help) I would like us to check that ticket [11:19:29] sure, no problem [11:19:44] great :) thanks [11:19:52] I'm starting conversion to git-buildpackage [11:20:05] drdee: do you agree with dropping git2deblogs in favor of git-buildpackage ? [11:20:17] yes [11:20:20] cool [11:21:16] New review: Yurik; "Not exactly. All new carriers we bring on board are signed up for both Zero & M, and several large Z..." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66034 [11:22:56] New review: Mark Bergsma; "Why not migrate those carriers to just m.wikipedia.org then? A redirect would do it and not have dup..." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66034 [11:26:07] yurik: I thought you were going to write to wikitech? [11:26:32] mark about merging zero & m? [11:26:47] I don't know about what, whatever it was you wanted the hangout about [11:26:48] i haven't written it yet because i need to discuss it with Dan [11:27:10] you still need to discuss it with Dan yet you already have a patchset that you want us to approve? :) [11:27:19] mark - unrelated :) [11:27:52] the patch is about marking all traffic with X-CS, so that we make all decisions in backend and don't have two configuration points [11:28:00] that has been decided on our end very long time ago [11:28:13] the hangout / email is about getting rid of ZERO subdomain [11:28:26] and eventually - M subdomain [11:28:36] but that needs to be checked with business first [11:28:37] yes but you're increasing variance for both old and new carriers [11:28:45] while we were just working hard to D [11:28:48] DECREASE variance [11:29:09] mark, the new carriers are always signed up for both M & ZERO -- that's business requirement [11:29:12] so why don't you come up with a grand plan for that first [11:29:31] yes, well, it's a stupid business requirement that's not in line with ops requirements [11:29:34] so about time we fix that then eh [11:29:49] mark, you will have to take that with Kul [11:29:56] if you want to support both domains, then make sure they get cached under a single object [11:30:00] no I don't [11:30:02] you will [11:30:37] mark, ok, i will bring up your objections, but they are not the same -- under ZERO the images are not shown, just links to them [11:30:59] and that's why you want ESI to differentiate? [11:31:01] i do want to get rid of ZERO, but that is not my decision t omake [11:31:29] does m.wikipedia have any carriers that don't allow images there? [11:31:54] ESI -- mostly i wanted it for banners, but they could also be used for imagse [11:32:06] but best of all - if javascript would make those decisions [11:32:19] there will be lots of work converting it to the new system [11:32:40] and its on our top priority right now [11:33:05] keep in mind that on our end we're also working on a system that allows you to configure such stuff based on ip ranges [11:33:11] so I gather that won't be necessary anymore? [11:33:48] we do want that patch in [11:34:17] anyway, it would really be nice if you could put your plans in emails, so we can all discuss and think about it [11:34:23] it's getting a bit confusing otherwise [11:34:35] sure thing, i will spell them out [11:34:38] thank you [11:37:44] New review: Mark Bergsma; "Yurik explained on IRC that the objects are actually different, images vs no images on ZERO." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66034 [11:48:11] yurik: where is the X-Images header set? [11:48:58] mark, in the backend -- pagerendinghooks.ph [11:49:27] why is it varied on then? [11:50:01] does the client send it with e.g. js? [11:51:39] mark, i suspect that header was initially was used to reduce cache variance, before the variance was set to depend on X-CS [11:52:04] right [11:52:08] i'm just wondering how it's supposed to work [11:52:14] it doesn't :) [11:52:20] can we remove it then? :) [11:52:30] i think at this point its a noop [11:52:37] yeah, so then it would be good to remove it [11:52:39] but i would have to check [11:52:45] because it's just confusing now [11:53:00] the additional processing is neglegible I'm sure, but for sanity we should remove it [11:53:44] i think the better way would be to use it properly instead of X-CS variance -- base stuff on X-IMAGE + ESI for the banner [11:54:06] but then you would need to set X-Images in Varnish again [11:54:37] oh, right. bummer. Yes it would [11:54:58] one thing we could do [11:55:21] is use that GEO lookup code to do IP->x-image [11:55:28] yes [11:55:39] we could fairly easily compile a range of ips that don't support images [11:55:39] that's why I don't understand why you want to remove all that stuff now [11:55:57] you can have your backend code generate a database of ip ranges to headers [11:56:04] and varnish can use that to set the headers [11:58:36] i would like to remove it because at this point the logic is scattered around multiple places, and we can't easily change it. For example, varnish checks for allowed languages, even though that list is stored in config page. So if the carrier decides to change that list, two lists have to be updated. Also, I would like to show a warning "this language is not whitelisted by your carrier" [11:59:05] but because varnish filters everything non-zero, we can't do that [11:59:40] I understand, but combined with the libvmapper vmod, any possible plans to merge m and zero and general work to reduce cache variance, it all seems rather confused [11:59:45] so that's why I'm asking to have it an email [11:59:47] then we can discuss it [12:00:24] yep, will write something shortly [12:00:37] (still trying to get IPv4 proxy up :(( [12:00:54] !log Gracefully reloading Zuul to deploy 'Ica1137438a1b9137f01276b4dfe49a82227de518' [12:01:03] Logged the message, Master [12:02:56] New patchset: Odder; "(bug 48308) Change namespace settings for ukwikisource" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66090 [12:06:34] New patchset: Odder; "(bug 48308) Change namespace settings for ukwikisource" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66090 [12:29:36] Who is giving out office VPN tokens? [12:32:31] office it I imagine? [12:32:49] there's a vpn? [12:32:51] who knew [12:34:13] i don't know [12:34:15] there have been [12:34:18] multiple instances [12:34:21] who knows what's there now :) [12:51:55] paravoid ping [12:51:58] pong [12:52:09] paravoid did you know about that problem we have on labs with nfs? [12:52:19] no [12:52:21] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48910 [12:52:32] the thing is that nfs server is fucked up and coren is on vacation [12:52:38] petan: I'm back. [12:52:43] And I see what has goine on. [12:52:45] Coren ooooooooooh [12:52:51] Coren what what? [12:53:02] Coren I was looking for it, is that the rpc.mountd thing? [12:53:03] There is a tool, ldaplist, that has stopped working. [12:53:06] or is it something else [12:53:08] ah [12:53:18] Which is what is used to extract all the local groups. [12:53:22] Coren can you write it down somewhere so that we can fix it when you are afk? :P [12:53:29] Coren where it runs? [12:53:31] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Split off 503 retry in vcl_error from 5xx retry in vcl_fetch" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66095 [12:53:58] petan: That's a tool written by Ryan, I think, or maybe Andrew. It's in python so I'm trying to understand it now. [12:54:04] ryan [12:54:05] ok [12:54:11] what's the issue? [12:54:15] is it running on -login or nfs server? [12:54:22] Rightnow, the only error message is "The search returned an error." [12:54:30] (Which isn't all tha useful) [12:54:35] I suppose there is no chance to get access to that box so that I could eventually fix it when you are not here? :P [12:54:44] It's on the NFS server -- that's part of the whole-labs infrastructure. [12:54:49] mhm [12:54:59] HASHAR [12:55:02] GALLIUM IS SLOW [12:55:16] petan: Possibly at some point, that's something the opsen will have to discuss. Unlike tool labs, it isn't just my call. :-) [12:55:21] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66095 [12:55:41] ok, can you fix it then? :P [12:55:54] because lot of people are poking me since it broke... [12:56:15] beside that everything works fine [12:56:18] petan: Understandably. That shouldn't ever have broken unless something changed in LDAP, so I'm trying to track down the change. [12:56:29] ok [12:59:05] except Exception: [12:59:06] sys.stderr.write("The search returned an error.\n") [12:59:06] ds.unbind() [12:59:06] sys.exit(1) [12:59:11] How... informative. [12:59:29] talk is cheap [12:59:31] :P [13:00:09] that looks like typical python [13:00:20] but still more than you would get from a c code [13:00:30] (coredump) [13:00:33] Meh. That's little else than: [13:00:55] mark: looking :D [13:01:04] i'm kidding [13:01:05] ldap.INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS: {'info': 'You do not have sufficient privileges to perform an unindexed search', 'desc': 'Insufficient access'} [13:01:16] o.O [13:01:16] Yep, something changed in LDAP [13:01:39] Either an index is gone, or the bind account got its privileges reduced. [13:02:40] Coren can you fix it? :/ [13:02:53] petan: Possibly, I' [13:03:07] I'll have to hunt in Gerrit to try and find a change to LDAP. [13:03:31] If I can't fix the actual problem, I'll hack a workaround somehow. [13:05:26] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Tier 2 backends should use the chash director for requesting upstream" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66097 [13:07:45] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66097 [13:10:57] !log gallium: blackholed some web crawler robot. [13:11:06] Logged the message, Master [13:11:42] New patchset: Catrope; "Clean up VisualEditor config" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/64493 [13:12:25] Change merged: jenkins-bot; [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/64493 [13:14:09] !log catrope synchronized visualeditor.dblist 'afe912f7a335ae037b8d8b0ba9616dc55848a2f0' [13:14:18] Logged the message, Master [13:14:43] !log catrope synchronized wmf-config/CommonSettings.php 'afe912f7a335ae037b8d8b0ba9616dc55848a2f0' [13:14:52] Logged the message, Master [13:15:29] !log catrope synchronized wmf-config/InitialiseSettings.php 'afe912f7a335ae037b8d8b0ba9616dc55848a2f0' [13:15:37] Logged the message, Master [13:16:12] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Reduce backend timeout to slightly lower than frontend" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66098 [13:16:55] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66098 [13:19:57] !log gallium: killed stalled Jenkins threads that were producing high I/O. [13:20:06] Logged the message, Master [13:20:18] !log Synced afe912f7a335ae037b8d8b0ba9616dc55848a2f0 for VisualEditor updates (logmsgbot seems to be broken) [13:20:23] * Coren yells unkind things at Gerrit making it so hard to search. [13:20:26] Logged the message, Mr. Obvious [13:20:35] !log (it's not broken, never mind, I'm just incapable of reading things) [13:20:43] Logged the message, Mr. Obvious [13:25:04] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "The retry503 parameter now specifies the number of restarts" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66099 [13:26:15] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66099 [13:27:26] Aha! I understand what happened. The LDAP grew because of all the new users to bigger than the default index-entry-limit (!) [13:31:38] New patchset: Catrope; "Make VisualEditor work in labs (hopefully)" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66100 [13:33:24] Change merged: jenkins-bot; [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66100 [13:45:08] * Coren tries to figure out the process to make LDAP changes, and fails. [13:48:14] RECOVERY - swift-container-server on ms-be4 is OK: PROCS OK: 13 processes with regex args ^/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/swift-container-server [13:48:14] RECOVERY - swift-account-auditor on ms-be4 is OK: PROCS OK: 1 process with regex args ^/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/swift-account-auditor [13:48:24] RECOVERY - DPKG on ms-be4 is OK: All packages OK [13:48:24] RECOVERY - swift-container-updater on ms-be4 is OK: PROCS OK: 1 process with regex args ^/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/swift-container-updater [13:48:24] RECOVERY - swift-account-reaper on ms-be4 is OK: PROCS OK: 1 process with regex args ^/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/swift-account-reaper [13:48:24] RECOVERY - Host mw1041 is UP: PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 0.25 ms [13:48:34] RECOVERY - Disk space on ms-be4 is OK: DISK OK [13:48:34] RECOVERY - swift-account-replicator on ms-be4 is OK: PROCS OK: 1 process with regex args ^/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/swift-account-replicator [13:48:34] RECOVERY - swift-object-auditor on ms-be4 is OK: PROCS OK: 2 processes with regex args ^/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/swift-object-auditor [13:48:44] RECOVERY - NTP on ms-be4 is OK: NTP OK: Offset -0.0001221895218 secs [13:48:44] RECOVERY - swift-object-replicator on ms-be4 is OK: PROCS OK: 1 process with regex args ^/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/swift-object-replicator [13:48:44] RECOVERY - swift-account-server on ms-be4 is OK: PROCS OK: 13 processes with regex args ^/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/swift-account-server [13:48:54] RECOVERY - swift-container-auditor on ms-be4 is OK: PROCS OK: 1 process with regex args ^/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/swift-container-auditor [13:48:54] RECOVERY - swift-object-server on ms-be4 is OK: PROCS OK: 101 processes with regex args ^/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/swift-object-server [13:48:54] RECOVERY - RAID on ms-be4 is OK: OK: State is Optimal, checked 1 logical device(s) [13:49:04] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on amslvs1 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [13:49:04] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on aluminium is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [13:49:04] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on amssq33 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [13:49:04] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on amslvs3 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [13:49:04] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on amslvs2 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [13:49:25] New patchset: Faidon; "Nagios/Varnish HTCP: fix illegal characters" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66102 [13:49:49] Change merged: Faidon; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66102 [13:50:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1218 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:04 UTC 2013 [13:50:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1132 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:04 UTC 2013 [13:50:24] PROBLEM - Disk space on ms-be1012 is CRITICAL: DISK CRITICAL - /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-137 is not accessible: Input/output error [13:50:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq55 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:24 UTC 2013 [13:50:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq81 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:24 UTC 2013 [13:50:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq64 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:29 UTC 2013 [13:50:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq59 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:30 UTC 2013 [13:50:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq40 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:30 UTC 2013 [13:50:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on aluminium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:30 UTC 2013 [13:50:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on virt2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:35 UTC 2013 [13:50:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db31 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:35 UTC 2013 [13:50:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:35 UTC 2013 [13:50:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1011 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:40 UTC 2013 [13:50:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-fe1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:40 UTC 2013 [13:50:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw87 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:45 UTC 2013 [13:50:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw111 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:45 UTC 2013 [13:50:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:45 UTC 2013 [13:50:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be10 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:45 UTC 2013 [13:50:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp3006 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:50 UTC 2013 [13:50:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on manutius is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:50 UTC 2013 [13:50:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv285 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:50 UTC 2013 [13:50:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search27 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:50 UTC 2013 [13:51:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on professor is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:55 UTC 2013 [13:51:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1072 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:55 UTC 2013 [13:51:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1134 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:55 UTC 2013 [13:51:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1219 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:50:55 UTC 2013 [13:51:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1011 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:00 UTC 2013 [13:51:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1031 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:00 UTC 2013 [13:51:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1178 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:05 UTC 2013 [13:51:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1139 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:05 UTC 2013 [13:51:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db29 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:10 UTC 2013 [13:51:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1080 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:25 UTC 2013 [13:52:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on magnesium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:55 UTC 2013 [13:52:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq82 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:55 UTC 2013 [13:52:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc8 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:55 UTC 2013 [13:52:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1006 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:55 UTC 2013 [13:52:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1011 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:55 UTC 2013 [13:52:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mchenry is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:55 UTC 2013 [13:52:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq78 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:55 UTC 2013 [13:52:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1093 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:51:55 UTC 2013 [13:52:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db60 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:00 UTC 2013 [13:52:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv270 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:00 UTC 2013 [13:52:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw114 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:00 UTC 2013 [13:52:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1013 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:00 UTC 2013 [13:52:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1203 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:00 UTC 2013 [13:52:10] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv282 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:00 UTC 2013 [13:52:10] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1016 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:00 UTC 2013 [13:52:11] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv280 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:00 UTC 2013 [13:52:11] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db73 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:01 UTC 2013 [13:52:12] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq32 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:01 UTC 2013 [13:52:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1010 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:06 UTC 2013 [13:52:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on stat1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:06 UTC 2013 [13:52:15] wheeee [13:52:42] heh [13:52:44] Coren any update on fix? :o [13:53:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:56 UTC 2013 [13:53:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db56 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:56 UTC 2013 [13:53:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv259 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:56 UTC 2013 [13:53:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1006 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:56 UTC 2013 [13:53:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw115 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:56 UTC 2013 [13:53:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1008 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:56 UTC 2013 [13:53:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq43 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:56 UTC 2013 [13:53:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq37 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:52:56 UTC 2013 [13:53:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1220 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:01 UTC 2013 [13:53:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw52 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:01 UTC 2013 [13:53:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on tmh1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:01 UTC 2013 [13:53:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on terbium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:01 UTC 2013 [13:53:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1215 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:01 UTC 2013 [13:53:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1020 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:06 UTC 2013 [13:53:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1200 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:06 UTC 2013 [13:53:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1015 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:06 UTC 2013 [13:53:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1045 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:06 UTC 2013 [13:53:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1006 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:06 UTC 2013 [13:53:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1141 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:06 UTC 2013 [13:53:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db59 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:21 UTC 2013 [13:53:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on linne is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:21 UTC 2013 [13:53:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv271 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:21 UTC 2013 [13:53:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be1004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:21 UTC 2013 [13:53:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ssl3001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:21 UTC 2013 [13:53:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:21 UTC 2013 [13:53:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ssl1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:26 UTC 2013 [13:53:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq59 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:27 UTC 2013 [13:53:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv298 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:27 UTC 2013 [13:53:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db36 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:27 UTC 2013 [13:53:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1174 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:32 UTC 2013 [13:53:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw92 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:32 UTC 2013 [13:53:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on arsenic is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:32 UTC 2013 [13:53:36] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on lvs3 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:32 UTC 2013 [13:53:36] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on emery is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:32 UTC 2013 [13:53:37] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1035 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:32 UTC 2013 [13:53:46] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1021 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:37 UTC 2013 [13:53:46] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1110 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:37 UTC 2013 [13:53:46] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on lvs4 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:37 UTC 2013 [13:53:46] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq77 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:38 UTC 2013 [13:53:46] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq50 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:43 UTC 2013 [13:53:47] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw113 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:43 UTC 2013 [13:53:47] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms1004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:43 UTC 2013 [13:53:48] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1158 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:43 UTC 2013 [13:53:48] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq49 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:43 UTC 2013 [13:53:49] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on chromium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:43 UTC 2013 [13:53:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc13 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:48 UTC 2013 [13:53:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es1008 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:48 UTC 2013 [13:53:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:48 UTC 2013 [13:54:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp3019 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:54 UTC 2013 [13:54:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw15 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:55 UTC 2013 [13:54:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:53:55 UTC 2013 [13:54:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1057 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:00 UTC 2013 [13:54:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp3021 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:01 UTC 2013 [13:54:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be1010 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:01 UTC 2013 [13:54:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on virt1005 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:01 UTC 2013 [13:54:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1090 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:01 UTC 2013 [13:54:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1017 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:02 UTC 2013 [13:54:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1016 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:02 UTC 2013 [13:54:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw65 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:02 UTC 2013 [13:54:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on harmon is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:07 UTC 2013 [13:54:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1059 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:07 UTC 2013 [13:54:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1056 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:07 UTC 2013 [13:54:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1112 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:12 UTC 2013 [13:54:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:12 UTC 2013 [13:54:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1145 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:12 UTC 2013 [13:54:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1121 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:17 UTC 2013 [13:54:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw59 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:17 UTC 2013 [13:54:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1026 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:17 UTC 2013 [13:54:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1086 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:17 UTC 2013 [13:54:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw91 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:18 UTC 2013 [13:54:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search23 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:18 UTC 2013 [13:54:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1045 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:18 UTC 2013 [13:54:26] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1135 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:23 UTC 2013 [13:54:26] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw3 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:23 UTC 2013 [13:54:27] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv268 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:23 UTC 2013 [13:54:27] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1120 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:23 UTC 2013 [13:54:28] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:23 UTC 2013 [13:54:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1009 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:28 UTC 2013 [13:54:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1021 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:28 UTC 2013 [13:54:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1008 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:28 UTC 2013 [13:54:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1108 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:28 UTC 2013 [13:54:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv243 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:28 UTC 2013 [13:54:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1148 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:28 UTC 2013 [13:54:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1073 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:33 UTC 2013 [13:54:36] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq75 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:33 UTC 2013 [13:54:36] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq66 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:33 UTC 2013 [13:54:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:38 UTC 2013 [13:54:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on nitrogen is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:38 UTC 2013 [13:54:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search35 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:38 UTC 2013 [13:54:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1008 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:43 UTC 2013 [13:54:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq36 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:43 UTC 2013 [13:54:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1046 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:43 UTC 2013 [13:54:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1009 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:43 UTC 2013 [13:54:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1020 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:44 UTC 2013 [13:54:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on hydrogen is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:44 UTC 2013 [13:54:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1018 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:49 UTC 2013 [13:54:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1082 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:49 UTC 2013 [13:54:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1015 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:49 UTC 2013 [13:54:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1199 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:49 UTC 2013 [13:55:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db64 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:54 UTC 2013 [13:55:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv251 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:54 UTC 2013 [13:55:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1049 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:54 UTC 2013 [13:55:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-fe1004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:54 UTC 2013 [13:55:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw25 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:54 UTC 2013 [13:55:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on snapshot3 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:54 UTC 2013 [13:55:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw7 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:59 UTC 2013 [13:55:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on constable is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:59 UTC 2013 [13:55:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1060 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:59 UTC 2013 [13:55:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv293 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:59 UTC 2013 [13:55:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on holmium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:54:59 UTC 2013 [13:55:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv235 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:04 UTC 2013 [13:55:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1042 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:05 UTC 2013 [13:55:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv274 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:05 UTC 2013 [13:55:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv257 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:10 UTC 2013 [13:55:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1119 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:35 UTC 2013 [13:55:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1061 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:35 UTC 2013 [13:55:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1085 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:35 UTC 2013 [13:55:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw56 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:35 UTC 2013 [13:55:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq56 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ersch is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1157 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:46] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq60 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:46] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1070 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:47] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw48 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:47] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1019 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:48] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq36 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:48] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on virt0 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:49] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq41 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:49] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1058 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:50] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc5 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:50] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw12 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:40 UTC 2013 [13:55:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1102 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:45 UTC 2013 [13:55:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on spence is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:45 UTC 2013 [13:55:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be1005 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:45 UTC 2013 [13:55:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db68 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:50 UTC 2013 [13:55:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db38 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:50 UTC 2013 [13:55:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1028 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:50 UTC 2013 [13:55:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1014 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:50 UTC 2013 [13:56:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ssl1004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:55:55 UTC 2013 [13:56:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw96 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:00 UTC 2013 [13:56:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv252 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:00 UTC 2013 [13:56:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be7 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:00 UTC 2013 [13:56:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1006 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:00 UTC 2013 [13:56:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1024 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:00 UTC 2013 [13:56:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv247 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:05 UTC 2013 [13:56:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw120 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:05 UTC 2013 [13:56:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv239 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:05 UTC 2013 [13:56:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search20 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:05 UTC 2013 [13:56:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw78 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:05 UTC 2013 [13:56:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1172 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:06 UTC 2013 [13:56:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw67 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:06 UTC 2013 [13:56:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1184 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:06 UTC 2013 [13:56:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1009 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:11 UTC 2013 [13:56:17] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1191 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:11 UTC 2013 [13:56:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1013 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:36 UTC 2013 [13:56:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on virt8 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:41 UTC 2013 [13:56:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1012 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1039 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1005 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on gallium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on silver is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on tmh1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq57 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq61 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db44 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db33 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es7 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1177 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on hooper is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1019 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:56:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:57:00] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq58 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:57:00] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db37 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:57:01] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-fe4 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:57:01] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on nfs2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:46 UTC 2013 [13:57:02] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv240 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:51 UTC 2013 [13:57:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1041 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:56 UTC 2013 [13:57:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw84 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:56 UTC 2013 [13:57:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv254 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:56 UTC 2013 [13:57:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw63 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:56 UTC 2013 [13:57:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on snapshot1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:56:56 UTC 2013 [13:57:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1018 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:01 UTC 2013 [13:57:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search26 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:01 UTC 2013 [13:57:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw69 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:01 UTC 2013 [13:57:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1195 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:01 UTC 2013 [13:57:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw17 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:01 UTC 2013 [13:57:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1013 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:02 UTC 2013 [13:57:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw71 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:02 UTC 2013 [13:57:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1016 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:07 UTC 2013 [13:57:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1043 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:07 UTC 2013 [13:57:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es1007 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:07 UTC 2013 [13:57:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1167 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:17 UTC 2013 [13:57:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amslvs3 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:17 UTC 2013 [13:57:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1055 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:18 UTC 2013 [13:57:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw80 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:23 UTC 2013 [13:57:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1036 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:23 UTC 2013 [13:57:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1076 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:23 UTC 2013 [13:57:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq53 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:23 UTC 2013 [13:57:26] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1149 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:23 UTC 2013 [13:57:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es3 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:33 UTC 2013 [13:57:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1007 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:33 UTC 2013 [13:57:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1010 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:38 UTC 2013 [13:57:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1170 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:48 UTC 2013 [13:57:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es1006 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:57:48 UTC 2013 [13:58:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db50 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:00 UTC 2013 [13:58:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1039 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:00 UTC 2013 [13:58:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on nfs1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:00 UTC 2013 [13:58:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1168 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:00 UTC 2013 [13:58:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1202 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:00 UTC 2013 [13:58:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw18 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:00 UTC 2013 [13:58:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw32 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:05 UTC 2013 [13:58:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq44 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:05 UTC 2013 [13:58:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1098 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:05 UTC 2013 [13:58:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1014 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:05 UTC 2013 [13:58:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1079 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:05 UTC 2013 [13:58:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1051 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:05 UTC 2013 [13:58:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp3022 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:05 UTC 2013 [13:58:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1151 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:05 UTC 2013 [13:58:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ssl3003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:10 UTC 2013 [13:58:17] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1013 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:10 UTC 2013 [13:58:17] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq69 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:10 UTC 2013 [13:58:24] RECOVERY - Disk space on ms-be1012 is OK: DISK OK [13:58:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1014 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:45 UTC 2013 [13:58:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1044 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:45 UTC 2013 [13:58:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search24 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:45 UTC 2013 [13:58:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on searchidx2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:45 UTC 2013 [13:58:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on iron is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:50 UTC 2013 [13:58:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on rdb1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:50 UTC 2013 [13:58:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on virt1007 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:50 UTC 2013 [13:58:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:50 UTC 2013 [13:58:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1026 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:50 UTC 2013 [13:58:56] New patchset: Wpmirrordev; "fix typos in Makefile, mwxml2sql.c, and sqlfilter.c; rename dist" [operations/dumps] (ariel) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65706 [13:58:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1030 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:50 UTC 2013 [13:58:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mexia is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:50 UTC 2013 [13:58:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on virt10 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:50 UTC 2013 [13:58:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1011 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:50 UTC 2013 [13:58:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db74 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:50 UTC 2013 [13:59:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db49 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:55 UTC 2013 [13:59:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw88 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:55 UTC 2013 [13:59:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw86 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:55 UTC 2013 [13:59:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1016 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:56 UTC 2013 [13:59:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be1008 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 13:58:56 UTC 2013 [13:59:37] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Specify a 20 connections limit for test" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66103 [13:59:37] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Switch role::cache::text to using role::cache::configuration for content backends" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66104 [14:00:26] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66103 [14:01:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1027 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:05 UTC 2013 [14:01:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be6 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:05 UTC 2013 [14:01:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw89 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:05 UTC 2013 [14:01:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1209 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:05 UTC 2013 [14:01:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1016 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:05 UTC 2013 [14:01:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1005 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:05 UTC 2013 [14:01:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw21 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:05 UTC 2013 [14:01:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1028 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:05 UTC 2013 [14:01:16] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66104 [14:01:30] apergos: so, are we done with the C2100s? :D [14:01:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1067 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:40 UTC 2013 [14:01:48] there hashar, your life is getting easier [14:02:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on zhen is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:55 UTC 2013 [14:02:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1152 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:55 UTC 2013 [14:02:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq60 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:55 UTC 2013 [14:02:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on kaulen is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:55 UTC 2013 [14:02:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-fe1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:55 UTC 2013 [14:02:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1020 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:55 UTC 2013 [14:02:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:01:55 UTC 2013 [14:02:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq49 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:00 UTC 2013 [14:02:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ssl3002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:00 UTC 2013 [14:02:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1009 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:00 UTC 2013 [14:02:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc9 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:00 UTC 2013 [14:02:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq33 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:00 UTC 2013 [14:02:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq42 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:00 UTC 2013 [14:02:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db71 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:00 UTC 2013 [14:02:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1017 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:00 UTC 2013 [14:02:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1014 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:00 UTC 2013 [14:02:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on snapshot2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:00 UTC 2013 [14:02:10] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq45 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:01 UTC 2013 [14:02:10] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on carbon is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:01 UTC 2013 [14:02:11] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv265 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:01 UTC 2013 [14:02:11] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv248 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:01 UTC 2013 [14:02:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw31 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:06 UTC 2013 [14:02:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv256 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:06 UTC 2013 [14:02:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv277 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:06 UTC 2013 [14:02:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1012 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:06 UTC 2013 [14:02:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1006 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:06 UTC 2013 [14:02:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1041 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:11 UTC 2013 [14:02:24] paravoid: yes [14:02:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv236 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:16 UTC 2013 [14:02:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw73 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:16 UTC 2013 [14:02:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw24 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:16 UTC 2013 [14:02:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1193 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:16 UTC 2013 [14:02:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on virt6 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:21 UTC 2013 [14:02:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search15 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:21 UTC 2013 [14:02:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw22 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:21 UTC 2013 [14:02:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp3008 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:21 UTC 2013 [14:02:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1071 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:31 UTC 2013 [14:02:35] stupid puppet [14:02:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ssl2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:42 UTC 2013 [14:02:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on virt9 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:47 UTC 2013 [14:03:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on yvon is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:02:57 UTC 2013 [14:03:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp3020 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:07 UTC 2013 [14:03:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on tridge is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:07 UTC 2013 [14:03:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq61 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:12 UTC 2013 [14:03:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1008 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:12 UTC 2013 [14:03:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1047 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:17 UTC 2013 [14:03:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq39 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:17 UTC 2013 [14:03:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1037 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:23 UTC 2013 [14:03:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1035 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:23 UTC 2013 [14:03:28] mark: thanks :-] [14:03:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1032 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:24 UTC 2013 [14:03:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1043 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:30 UTC 2013 [14:03:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on strontium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:30 UTC 2013 [14:03:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp3004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:30 UTC 2013 [14:03:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on maerlant is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:30 UTC 2013 [14:03:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp3005 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:30 UTC 2013 [14:03:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on tola is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:40 UTC 2013 [14:03:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on pc2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:45 UTC 2013 [14:03:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1064 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:45 UTC 2013 [14:03:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search34 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:45 UTC 2013 [14:03:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1025 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:45 UTC 2013 [14:03:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw77 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:50 UTC 2013 [14:04:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db52 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:55 UTC 2013 [14:04:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq67 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:55 UTC 2013 [14:04:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw54 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:55 UTC 2013 [14:04:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1037 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:55 UTC 2013 [14:04:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1187 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:55 UTC 2013 [14:04:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search28 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:03:55 UTC 2013 [14:04:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1207 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:00 UTC 2013 [14:04:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on snapshot1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:00 UTC 2013 [14:04:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw101 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:00 UTC 2013 [14:04:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw108 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:00 UTC 2013 [14:04:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw103 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:00 UTC 2013 [14:04:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw94 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:00 UTC 2013 [14:04:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv295 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:06 UTC 2013 [14:04:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1005 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:06 UTC 2013 [14:04:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw105 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:06 UTC 2013 [14:04:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1007 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search13 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1015 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1160 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1113 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq54 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq52 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on nescio is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on tmh2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq71 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq83 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw29 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp3003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:04:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq86 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:05:00] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:05:00] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db40 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:51 UTC 2013 [14:05:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1088 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw51 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw16 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1054 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on labsdb1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1010 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1176 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on stafford is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv300 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv287 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1103 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:10] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on labsdb1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:10] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1164 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:04:56 UTC 2013 [14:05:11] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1100 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:01 UTC 2013 [14:05:11] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1012 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:01 UTC 2013 [14:05:12] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on kuo is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:01 UTC 2013 [14:05:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1018 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:06 UTC 2013 [14:05:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1099 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:06 UTC 2013 [14:05:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1117 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:06 UTC 2013 [14:05:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be8 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:06 UTC 2013 [14:05:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw82 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:11 UTC 2013 [14:05:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp3007 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:11 UTC 2013 [14:05:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw122 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:11 UTC 2013 [14:05:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search17 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:12 UTC 2013 [14:05:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw20 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:17 UTC 2013 [14:05:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw66 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:17 UTC 2013 [14:05:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1015 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:17 UTC 2013 [14:05:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv297 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:17 UTC 2013 [14:05:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1008 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:17 UTC 2013 [14:05:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1144 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:17 UTC 2013 [14:05:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1123 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:22 UTC 2013 [14:05:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw34 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:22 UTC 2013 [14:05:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1065 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:22 UTC 2013 [14:05:26] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1052 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:22 UTC 2013 [14:05:26] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1101 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:22 UTC 2013 [14:05:27] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1095 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:22 UTC 2013 [14:05:27] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1042 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:22 UTC 2013 [14:05:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on williams is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:27 UTC 2013 [14:05:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv238 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:34 UTC 2013 [14:05:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq55 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:34 UTC 2013 [14:05:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:35 UTC 2013 [14:05:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1019 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:41 UTC 2013 [14:05:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1012 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:41 UTC 2013 [14:05:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc3 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:41 UTC 2013 [14:05:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1017 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:46 UTC 2013 [14:05:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1019 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:51 UTC 2013 [14:05:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on lvs1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:05:51 UTC 2013 [14:06:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq65 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:02 UTC 2013 [14:06:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1028 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:02 UTC 2013 [14:06:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1020 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:07 UTC 2013 [14:06:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw125 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:07 UTC 2013 [14:06:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv286 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:07 UTC 2013 [14:06:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv258 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:07 UTC 2013 [14:06:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw9 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:07 UTC 2013 [14:06:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw47 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:17 UTC 2013 [14:06:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on dobson is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:28 UTC 2013 [14:06:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1182 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:28 UTC 2013 [14:06:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv250 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:38 UTC 2013 [14:06:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search22 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:43 UTC 2013 [14:06:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1018 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:43 UTC 2013 [14:06:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1023 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:43 UTC 2013 [14:06:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on tin is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:48 UTC 2013 [14:06:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on gurvin is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq72 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es10 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1013 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1214 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es4 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db53 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es1005 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw62 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq73 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1127 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq45 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:06:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1052 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:07:00] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on pc1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:49 UTC 2013 [14:07:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw14 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:54 UTC 2013 [14:07:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq57 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:54 UTC 2013 [14:07:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq34 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:54 UTC 2013 [14:07:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv284 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:54 UTC 2013 [14:07:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1126 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:06:54 UTC 2013 [14:07:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1114 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:00 UTC 2013 [14:07:10] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw81 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:00 UTC 2013 [14:07:10] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw90 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:00 UTC 2013 [14:07:11] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on fenari is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:00 UTC 2013 [14:07:11] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw41 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:00 UTC 2013 [14:07:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1014 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:05 UTC 2013 [14:07:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search21 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:05 UTC 2013 [14:07:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1162 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:05 UTC 2013 [14:07:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1044 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:05 UTC 2013 [14:07:14] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Make role::cache::upload use role::cache::configuration for image scaler backends" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66105 [14:07:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms5 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:05 UTC 2013 [14:07:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1196 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:05 UTC 2013 [14:07:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw11 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:15 UTC 2013 [14:07:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on lvs5 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:15 UTC 2013 [14:07:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw5 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:15 UTC 2013 [14:07:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on zirconium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:20 UTC 2013 [14:07:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq79 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:20 UTC 2013 [14:07:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1048 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:25 UTC 2013 [14:07:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on pc1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:30 UTC 2013 [14:07:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1006 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:30 UTC 2013 [14:07:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw19 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:30 UTC 2013 [14:07:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1024 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:35 UTC 2013 [14:07:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1005 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:40 UTC 2013 [14:07:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cerium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:45 UTC 2013 [14:07:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw118 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:45 UTC 2013 [14:07:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw119 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:45 UTC 2013 [14:07:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1217 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:50 UTC 2013 [14:07:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw38 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:50 UTC 2013 [14:07:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv301 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:51 UTC 2013 [14:07:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv290 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:51 UTC 2013 [14:07:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1190 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:51 UTC 2013 [14:07:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be4 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:51 UTC 2013 [14:08:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1130 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:56 UTC 2013 [14:08:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1036 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:56 UTC 2013 [14:08:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw46 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:07:56 UTC 2013 [14:08:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on gadolinium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:01 UTC 2013 [14:08:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search36 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:01 UTC 2013 [14:08:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw83 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:01 UTC 2013 [14:08:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1147 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:06 UTC 2013 [14:08:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1124 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:06 UTC 2013 [14:08:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1161 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:06 UTC 2013 [14:08:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1111 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:06 UTC 2013 [14:08:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1015 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:06 UTC 2013 [14:08:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq51 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:26 UTC 2013 [14:08:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq44 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:26 UTC 2013 [14:08:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1010 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:41 UTC 2013 [14:08:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:41 UTC 2013 [14:08:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1018 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:41 UTC 2013 [14:08:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on solr2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:41 UTC 2013 [14:08:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1009 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:46 UTC 2013 [14:08:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:46 UTC 2013 [14:08:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1011 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:46 UTC 2013 [14:08:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be1012 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:46 UTC 2013 [14:08:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db43 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:46 UTC 2013 [14:08:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on vanadium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:46 UTC 2013 [14:08:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv249 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:51 UTC 2013 [14:08:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1023 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:51 UTC 2013 [14:08:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv289 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:51 UTC 2013 [14:09:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv244 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:56 UTC 2013 [14:09:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv246 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:56 UTC 2013 [14:09:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv253 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:56 UTC 2013 [14:09:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-fe3 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:56 UTC 2013 [14:09:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv245 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:08:56 UTC 2013 [14:09:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1020 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:01 UTC 2013 [14:09:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1089 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:01 UTC 2013 [14:09:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:01 UTC 2013 [14:09:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw30 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:01 UTC 2013 [14:09:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search19 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:01 UTC 2013 [14:09:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:01 UTC 2013 [14:09:06] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66105 [14:09:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1081 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:02 UTC 2013 [14:09:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1057 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:07 UTC 2013 [14:09:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1038 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:07 UTC 2013 [14:09:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1146 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:07 UTC 2013 [14:09:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw76 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:07 UTC 2013 [14:09:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search14 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:37 UTC 2013 [14:09:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1048 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:42 UTC 2013 [14:09:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq74 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:42 UTC 2013 [14:09:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1115 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:42 UTC 2013 [14:09:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq48 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:42 UTC 2013 [14:09:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq43 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:42 UTC 2013 [14:09:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1056 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:42 UTC 2013 [14:09:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq85 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:42 UTC 2013 [14:09:46] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq42 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:42 UTC 2013 [14:09:46] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on manganese is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:42 UTC 2013 [14:09:47] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es6 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:42 UTC 2013 [14:09:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1159 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:47 UTC 2013 [14:09:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:47 UTC 2013 [14:09:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be9 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:47 UTC 2013 [14:09:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1029 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:47 UTC 2013 [14:09:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on snapshot1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:47 UTC 2013 [14:09:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be3 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:52 UTC 2013 [14:10:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1125 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:57 UTC 2013 [14:10:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1197 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:57 UTC 2013 [14:10:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv276 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:09:57 UTC 2013 [14:10:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1007 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:02 UTC 2013 [14:10:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1210 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:02 UTC 2013 [14:10:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1188 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:02 UTC 2013 [14:10:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1024 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:02 UTC 2013 [14:10:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv294 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:02 UTC 2013 [14:10:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search18 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:02 UTC 2013 [14:10:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv292 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:02 UTC 2013 [14:10:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw121 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:02 UTC 2013 [14:10:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw58 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:02 UTC 2013 [14:10:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw8 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:02 UTC 2013 [14:10:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db58 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:02 UTC 2013 [14:10:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1140 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:07 UTC 2013 [14:10:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1186 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:07 UTC 2013 [14:10:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:07 UTC 2013 [14:10:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1087 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:07 UTC 2013 [14:10:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on stat1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:12 UTC 2013 [14:10:26] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1043 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:18 UTC 2013 [14:10:26] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1041 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:23 UTC 2013 [14:10:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq76 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:28 UTC 2013 [14:10:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1036 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:28 UTC 2013 [14:10:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on titanium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:33 UTC 2013 [14:10:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on praseodymium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:33 UTC 2013 [14:10:40] reedy@fenari:/home/wikipedia$ sql aawiki [14:10:40] The MediaWiki script file "/home/wikipedia/common/php-1.22wmf5/maintenance/eval.php" does not exist. [14:10:41] Gah [14:10:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on helium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:38 UTC 2013 [14:10:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1015 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:43 UTC 2013 [14:10:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq53 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:53 UTC 2013 [14:10:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ekrem is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:53 UTC 2013 [14:11:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on searchidx1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:58 UTC 2013 [14:11:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv273 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:59 UTC 2013 [14:11:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:59 UTC 2013 [14:11:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms10 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:10:59 UTC 2013 [14:11:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db34 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:00 UTC 2013 [14:11:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc7 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:00 UTC 2013 [14:11:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on rdb1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:05 UTC 2013 [14:11:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1007 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:05 UTC 2013 [14:11:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp3009 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:05 UTC 2013 [14:11:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on potassium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:05 UTC 2013 [14:11:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db39 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:40 UTC 2013 [14:11:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1014 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:40 UTC 2013 [14:11:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be1006 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:40 UTC 2013 [14:11:45] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1031 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:40 UTC 2013 [14:11:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:45 UTC 2013 [14:11:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1024 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:46 UTC 2013 [14:11:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq58 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:11:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1044 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:11:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq54 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:11:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-fe1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:11:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc10 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:11:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1022 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:11:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1007 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:11:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1010 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:11:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw124 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:11:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw43 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:11:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv255 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:11:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw57 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:51 UTC 2013 [14:12:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw79 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:56 UTC 2013 [14:12:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw106 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:56 UTC 2013 [14:12:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1032 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:56 UTC 2013 [14:12:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw98 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:56 UTC 2013 [14:12:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on solr3 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:11:56 UTC 2013 [14:12:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on solr1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:12:01 UTC 2013 [14:12:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db63 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:12:01 UTC 2013 [14:12:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1201 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:12:01 UTC 2013 [14:12:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1189 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:12:01 UTC 2013 [14:12:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1205 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:12:01 UTC 2013 [14:12:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1033 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:12:01 UTC 2013 [14:12:26] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Switch tier 2 (esams) upload backends to use chash when talking upstream" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66107 [14:12:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw35 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:12:36 UTC 2013 [14:12:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:12:51 UTC 2013 [14:13:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amslvs1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:06 UTC 2013 [14:13:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on calcium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:11 UTC 2013 [14:13:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq63 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:13 UTC 2013 [14:13:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be11 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:13 UTC 2013 [14:13:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ssl1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:13 UTC 2013 [14:13:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1030 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:13 UTC 2013 [14:13:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db48 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:13 UTC 2013 [14:13:15] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:13 UTC 2013 [14:13:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on solr1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:13 UTC 2013 [14:13:17] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66107 [14:13:17] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1046 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:13 UTC 2013 [14:13:17] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1068 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:13 UTC 2013 [14:13:19] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1033 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:13 UTC 2013 [14:13:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv267 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:18 UTC 2013 [14:13:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1150 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:18 UTC 2013 [14:13:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:18 UTC 2013 [14:13:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:23 UTC 2013 [14:13:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1010 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:23 UTC 2013 [14:13:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw68 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:23 UTC 2013 [14:13:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1063 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:23 UTC 2013 [14:13:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv193 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:24 UTC 2013 [14:13:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1106 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:24 UTC 2013 [14:13:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1024 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:34 UTC 2013 [14:13:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1142 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:34 UTC 2013 [14:13:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1069 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:34 UTC 2013 [14:13:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw37 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:34 UTC 2013 [14:13:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1122 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:34 UTC 2013 [14:13:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq48 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:39 UTC 2013 [14:13:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw112 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:44 UTC 2013 [14:13:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv260 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:44 UTC 2013 [14:13:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on pc1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:44 UTC 2013 [14:13:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv262 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:49 UTC 2013 [14:14:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1034 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:54 UTC 2013 [14:14:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search25 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:54 UTC 2013 [14:14:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db54 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:54 UTC 2013 [14:14:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on virt11 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:54 UTC 2013 [14:14:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw104 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:54 UTC 2013 [14:14:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on fluorine is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:59 UTC 2013 [14:14:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db66 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:59 UTC 2013 [14:14:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1013 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:13:59 UTC 2013 [14:14:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv269 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:04 UTC 2013 [14:14:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1092 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:04 UTC 2013 [14:14:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1022 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:09 UTC 2013 [14:14:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on pdf3 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:09 UTC 2013 [14:14:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1026 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:14 UTC 2013 [14:14:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1007 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:19 UTC 2013 [14:14:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amslvs4 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:19 UTC 2013 [14:14:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw60 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:19 UTC 2013 [14:14:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw28 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:24 UTC 2013 [14:14:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1213 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:24 UTC 2013 [14:14:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw23 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:24 UTC 2013 [14:14:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw116 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:24 UTC 2013 [14:14:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1012 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:24 UTC 2013 [14:14:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1011 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:29 UTC 2013 [14:14:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw10 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:29 UTC 2013 [14:14:36] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq47 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:29 UTC 2013 [14:14:36] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1204 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:29 UTC 2013 [14:14:37] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1129 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:29 UTC 2013 [14:14:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1005 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:35 UTC 2013 [14:14:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1027 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:35 UTC 2013 [14:14:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sockpuppet is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:35 UTC 2013 [14:14:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1042 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:40 UTC 2013 [14:14:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1051 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:40 UTC 2013 [14:14:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1091 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:40 UTC 2013 [14:14:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on labstore1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:45 UTC 2013 [14:14:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1025 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:45 UTC 2013 [14:15:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db9 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:55 UTC 2013 [14:15:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:14:55 UTC 2013 [14:15:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search29 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:00 UTC 2013 [14:15:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:00 UTC 2013 [14:15:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search30 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:00 UTC 2013 [14:15:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1211 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:05 UTC 2013 [14:15:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1014 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:30 UTC 2013 [14:15:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1054 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:46 UTC 2013 [14:15:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq84 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq52 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on labstore3 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-fe1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc14 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc1012 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq41 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ssl1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es1004 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on antimony is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1118 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1066 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1143 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:15:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on labstore1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:16:00] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sodium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:16:00] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on lvs1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:16:01] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on dataset1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:16:01] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on solr1 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:51 UTC 2013 [14:16:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw42 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:56 UTC 2013 [14:16:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1021 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:15:56 UTC 2013 [14:16:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:01 UTC 2013 [14:16:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv242 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:01 UTC 2013 [14:16:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be5 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:01 UTC 2013 [14:16:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq56 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:01 UTC 2013 [14:16:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1155 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:01 UTC 2013 [14:16:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw93 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:06 UTC 2013 [14:16:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw55 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:06 UTC 2013 [14:16:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1154 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:06 UTC 2013 [14:16:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on snapshot1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:06 UTC 2013 [14:16:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw75 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:06 UTC 2013 [14:16:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1208 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:06 UTC 2013 [14:16:23] :o [14:16:28] omgflood [14:16:32] yay puppet ran! [14:16:34] \o [14:16:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq62 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:46 UTC 2013 [14:16:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on capella is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:46 UTC 2013 [14:16:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ssl1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:46 UTC 2013 [14:16:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv299 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:46 UTC 2013 [14:16:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1034 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:46 UTC 2013 [14:16:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv283 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:46 UTC 2013 [14:16:55] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc11 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:46 UTC 2013 [14:16:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv261 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:46 UTC 2013 [14:16:56] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1180 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:46 UTC 2013 [14:16:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1017 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:46 UTC 2013 [14:16:57] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1016 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:46 UTC 2013 [14:16:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search33 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:47 UTC 2013 [14:16:58] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amslvs2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:47 UTC 2013 [14:16:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms6 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:47 UTC 2013 [14:16:59] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1206 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:47 UTC 2013 [14:17:00] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1104 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:47 UTC 2013 [14:17:00] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on labstore2 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:47 UTC 2013 [14:17:02] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc12 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:47 UTC 2013 [14:17:02] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db67 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:47 UTC 2013 [14:17:02] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db69 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:47 UTC 2013 [14:17:02] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1128 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:47 UTC 2013 [14:17:03] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on solr1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:47 UTC 2013 [14:17:03] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on palladium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:52 UTC 2013 [14:17:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1049 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:52 UTC 2013 [14:17:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1105 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:52 UTC 2013 [14:17:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ssl4 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:52 UTC 2013 [14:17:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1022 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:52 UTC 2013 [14:17:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on cp1018 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:57 UTC 2013 [14:17:06] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on es9 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:57 UTC 2013 [14:17:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1194 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:57 UTC 2013 [14:17:07] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1026 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:57 UTC 2013 [14:17:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on tmh1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:57 UTC 2013 [14:17:08] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1027 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:57 UTC 2013 [14:17:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1153 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:16:57 UTC 2013 [14:17:09] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1047 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:02 UTC 2013 [14:17:10] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1084 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:02 UTC 2013 [14:17:10] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw74 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:02 UTC 2013 [14:17:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on hume is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:07 UTC 2013 [14:17:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1137 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:07 UTC 2013 [14:17:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1005 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:07 UTC 2013 [14:17:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sanger is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:07 UTC 2013 [14:17:16] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search31 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:12 UTC 2013 [14:17:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db32 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:17 UTC 2013 [14:17:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on analytics1009 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:17 UTC 2013 [14:17:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1005 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:17 UTC 2013 [14:17:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1165 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:17 UTC 2013 [14:17:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw13 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:22 UTC 2013 [14:17:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1015 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:22 UTC 2013 [14:17:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1003 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:22 UTC 2013 [14:17:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv291 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:23 UTC 2013 [14:17:25] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1078 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:23 UTC 2013 [14:17:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq35 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:33 UTC 2013 [14:17:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on nickel is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:33 UTC 2013 [14:17:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1030 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:33 UTC 2013 [14:17:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw45 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:33 UTC 2013 [14:17:35] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq37 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:33 UTC 2013 [14:17:36] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq31 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:33 UTC 2013 [14:17:36] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1020 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:33 UTC 2013 [14:17:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mc4 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:43 UTC 2013 [14:17:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1058 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:43 UTC 2013 [14:17:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on sq68 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:43 UTC 2013 [14:17:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db1009 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:48 UTC 2013 [14:17:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be1007 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:48 UTC 2013 [14:17:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on wtp1002 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:48 UTC 2013 [14:17:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1179 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:53 UTC 2013 [14:17:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on niobium is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:17:53 UTC 2013 [14:18:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw95 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:03 UTC 2013 [14:18:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on search1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:03 UTC 2013 [14:18:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db77 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:03 UTC 2013 [14:18:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv272 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:03 UTC 2013 [14:18:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on srv264 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:03 UTC 2013 [14:18:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1075 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:08 UTC 2013 [14:18:14] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on db65 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:08 UTC 2013 [14:18:24] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw99 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:13 UTC 2013 [14:18:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on bast1001 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:24 UTC 2013 [14:18:34] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1166 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:29 UTC 2013 [14:18:44] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on amssq51 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:39 UTC 2013 [14:18:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1107 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:49 UTC 2013 [14:19:04] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on ms-be12 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:18:54 UTC 2013 [14:20:44] PROBLEM - Host wtp1008 is DOWN: PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 100% [14:21:26] RECOVERY - Host wtp1008 is UP: PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 0.57 ms [14:23:14] PROBLEM - SSH on amslvs1 is CRITICAL: Server answer: [14:23:24] hi apergos you've been working on beta labs in recent times as I recall. do you have any suggestions for dealing with https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48203? [14:23:56] apergos: without the question mark https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48203 :) [14:24:14] RECOVERY - SSH on amslvs1 is OK: SSH OK - OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1.1 (protocol 2.0) [14:25:52] New patchset: coren; "Add servicegroups DB to ldaplist" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66108 [14:26:01] reedy@bast1001:~$ sql testwiki [14:26:01] /usr/local/bin/sql: line 4: /etc/cluster: No such file or directory [14:26:01] Could not open input file: /srv/deployment/mediawiki/common/multiversion/MWScript.php [14:26:04] this is getting painful [14:26:10] wtf? [14:26:42] on fenari it was originally complaining that there was no /h/w/c/php-1.22wmf5, which is fair enough [14:26:43] fix that [14:27:03] reedy@fenari:/usr/local/apache/common$ sql testwiki [14:27:03] mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.5.31, for debian-linux-gnu (x86_64) using readline 6.2 [14:27:03] Copyright (c) 2000, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. [14:27:05] Apparently no error message [14:27:08] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Use the appserver cluster as default backend" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66109 [14:27:44] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66109 [14:27:58] Great, applicationserver::config::apache provides /etc/cluster [14:28:40] Reedy: I think /etc/cluster is deprecated nowadays [14:28:58] there's /etc/wikimedia-site and /etc/wikimedia-realm now [14:29:01] It's still apparently used [14:29:17] Then terbium thinks it's on gitdeploy [14:29:18] class misc::deployment::vars ($system = "git-deploy") { [14:29:18] if $system == "git-deploy" { [14:29:20] it used to be provided by some wikimedia-task-appserver debian package iirc [14:30:53] god damn it [14:30:57] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Rename the 'apaches' backend to 'appservers'" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66110 [14:31:39] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66110 [14:32:19] mark: s/image_scalers/rendering/ too? [14:32:28] sql testwiki works on terbium [14:32:43] paravoid: already did that [14:33:11] except for mobile [14:33:23] sorry, no [14:33:30] not in the varnish config yet [14:33:36] but we can certainly rename that [14:35:44] New patchset: Faidon; "Varnish: rename image_scalers to rendering" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66111 [14:36:26] brb [14:36:54] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on neon is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 14:36:47 UTC 2013 [14:37:23] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Rename the 'image_scalers' Varnish backend to 'rendering'" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66112 [14:37:54] you're really annoying, you know that [14:38:27] Change abandoned: Mark Bergsma; "Fine, you babysit it :)" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66112 [14:41:44] !log reedy synchronized wmf-config/InitialiseSettings.php 'Enable SecurePoll on testwiki' [14:41:53] Logged the message, Master [14:41:59] * hashar is happy [14:43:55] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66111 [14:44:21] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Use the rendering backend for the thumb handler" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66113 [14:45:39] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Use the rendering backend for the thumb handler" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66113 [14:46:07] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66113 [14:50:36] New patchset: Reedy; "Enable SecurePoll on testwiki" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66114 [14:52:10] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Trigger on fewer other session/token cookies" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66115 [14:55:34] New patchset: Petrb; "new tool for easy sql replica access" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65634 [14:58:23] !log restarting ms-fe4 proxy [14:58:29] petan: good to see you doing more puppet stuff :-] [14:58:31] Logged the message, Master [14:59:03] hashar yes I am almost spending as much time in gerrit as I spend writing the code which I am about to commit :> that is a good progress I think [14:59:20] before I spent like 2 minutes writing code and 3 days pushing it to gerrit [14:59:30] :P [15:03:05] petan: welcome to the club [15:03:48] petan: gerrit is good, it builds character [15:03:56] but this repository still has problem with almost no people who merge stuff :/ [15:04:22] petan: so you might consider putting the tools script in a different repository [15:04:41] petan: for CI we have all our stuff under integration/* repositories, hence we bypass ops entirely :-] [15:05:27] hashar does it let puppet access these config files? [15:05:40] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Introduce an $extra_vcl instance parameter, use it for zero" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66116 [15:05:55] petan: na we deploy manually [15:06:02] petan: or using Jenkins *grin* [15:06:03] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66115 [15:06:05] aha [15:08:13] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Introduce an $extra_vcl instance parameter, use it for zero" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66116 [15:09:05] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66116 [15:11:25] ori-l: I splitted up twinkle on en-wiki now into 23 files [15:13:37] New patchset: BBlack; "allow text hostnames for -c cmdline arg" [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66118 [15:15:05] New review: Aude; "We have updated the Special:ItemByTitle code to accept wikipedia interwiki codes used in the subdoma..." [operations/apache-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65443 [15:15:59] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Munge and restore Cookie on both frontend and backend" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66119 [15:16:16] Change merged: BBlack; [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66118 [15:17:31] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Munge and restore Cookie on both frontend and backend" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66119 [15:18:07] * mark wonders when jenkins will spin up a varnish instance to compile and test a VCL file ;) [15:19:03] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66119 [15:33:13] New patchset: Reedy; "Enable SecurePoll on testwiki" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66114 [15:33:15] Change merged: Reedy; [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66114 [15:51:25] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Awful hacks to make Puppet work are nothing new..." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66124 [15:52:58] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Awful hacks to make Puppet work are nothing new..." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66124 [16:00:10] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Awful hacks to make Puppet work are nothing new..." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66124 [16:05:18] Change merged: Andrew Bogott; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66108 [16:06:52] hey mark, can we go ahead with https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/65823/ ? [16:07:29] MaxSem: yeah, but are you sure that's all that can be removed from that regex? [16:08:05] RECOVERY - Puppet freshness on mw1131 is OK: puppet ran at Thu May 30 16:07:57 UTC 2013 [16:08:08] Change merged: coren; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65634 [16:08:27] is everything all right with how images are served? [16:08:38] I'm having trouble getting thumbnails... [16:08:45] uh oh [16:09:11] hah [16:09:11] and I'm like — reading Wikipedia articles, nothing special [16:09:43] * mark points at paravoid [16:09:48] it must be his fault [16:09:57] odder: are you in europe? [16:10:00] yes [16:10:08] odder: do you have an example url? [16:10:32] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:S._Oliver_Headquarter_Rottendorf.jpg [16:10:59] or wait, I can see it on https [16:11:03] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:S._Oliver_Headquarter_Rottendorf.jpg [16:11:32] guru meditation [16:11:33] yay [16:11:42] WFM from Europe [16:11:46] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/S._Oliver_Headquarter_Rottendorf.jpg/313px-S._Oliver_Headquarter_Rottendorf.jpg [16:12:48] i'm seeing 500s from the image servers [16:14:02] swift you mean? [16:15:01] yeah [16:15:05] fro the scalers, because I see php headers [16:16:05] set req.backend = eqiad; [16:16:25] oh ipv6 [16:16:29] dammit, bites me every time [16:17:23] i was seeing them in eqiad [16:17:28] looking at swift logs [16:17:28] so it's unlikely to be esams related [16:18:09] !log updated OpenStackManager on virt0 to git head. [16:18:18] Logged the message, Master [16:20:18] yet the 503 I got stopped at cp3003 [16:20:39] timeout issues? [16:20:41] because it timed out waiting fo upstream I think [16:20:47] yeah [16:21:13] I don't see anything wrong with image scalers [16:22:33] 114 RxStatus b 500 [16:22:33] 114 RxResponse b Internal server error [16:22:33] 114 RxHeader b X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff [16:22:33] 114 RxHeader b X-Powered-By: PHP/5.3.10-1ubuntu3.6+wmf1 [16:22:40] on a backend varnish instance in eqiad [16:23:13] so that's from either swift or the image scalers [16:23:15] sec [16:23:32] well, more likely from the image scalers, with the php header [16:24:17] i'm indeed seeing many 5xx sent from an image scaler [16:24:32] that happens often [16:24:38] ok, so [16:24:41] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/S._Oliver_Headquarter_Rottendorf.jpg/313px-S._Oliver_Headquarter_Rottendorf.jpg [16:25:08] requests to all ms-fe[1234].pmtpa.wmnet returns instanteously [16:25:21] for that url you mean? [16:25:24] yes [16:25:32] so could be that varnish marks them as unhealthy [16:25:37] hmm [16:25:46] because of swift returning 500, that comes from imagescalers' 500 [16:25:53] that comes from trying to resize a large image or something [16:25:56] no it doesn't use that [16:26:07] it only relies on its own health checks, which it doesn't seem to be doing for swift [16:26:23] oh, right. [16:27:20] ha [16:27:23] it is esams indeed [16:27:25] I think we have a swift probe somewhere that we don't use [16:27:28] found it? [16:27:40] no but I asked an eqiad varnish, it returned instantly [16:27:44] esams, not so much [16:28:06] Change abandoned: coren; "Obsoleted by https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/65634/" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/64847 [16:28:11] but e.g. cp3003 marks all backends as healthy [16:29:11] 347 VCL_call c miss fetch [16:29:11] 347 FetchError c no backend connection [16:31:05] New review: coren; "This is reasonably useful for exec_environ as well." [operations/puppet] (production) C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65705 [16:31:09] Change merged: coren; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65705 [16:34:25] New review: coren; "Trivial package add." [operations/puppet] (production) C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65942 [16:34:36] New patchset: coren; "r-base on tools project" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65942 [16:35:20] Change merged: coren; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65942 [16:37:44] i changed chash back into random on cp3003 [16:37:48] to see if that makes a difference [16:37:49] mark, while i'm writing that email, i will submit a patch to at least remove the language filtering -- this way we can show a warning to the user that other langs are whitelisted, but not this one [16:37:52] manual change, puppet will revert [16:38:10] it did [16:38:13] works now [16:39:00] weird [16:39:16] have we tested chash with ipv6 before? :) [16:39:16] https://ganglia.wikimedia.org/latest/graph_all_periods.php?c=Upload%20caches%20esams&h=cp3003.esams.wikimedia.org&r=day&z=default&jr=&js=&st=1369931898&v=10788659&m=varnish.backend_fail&vl=N%2Fs&ti=Backend%20conn.%20failures&z=large [16:39:23] hah [16:39:29] probably not [16:39:34] ok, i'll revert that change [16:40:12] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Revert "Switch tier 2 (esams) upload backends to use chash when talking upstream"" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66126 [16:41:09] New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Revert "Switch tier 2 (esams) upload backends to use chash when talking upstream"" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66126 [16:41:31] Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66126 [16:43:06] New patchset: coren; "inserted 7z to list of packages on dev" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65876 [16:43:59] New review: coren; "Trivial package addition." [operations/puppet] (production) C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65876 [16:44:03] Change merged: coren; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65876 [16:44:21] ok [16:44:28] did a sed on all esams upload machines [16:44:32] should be fine now [16:44:58] but that connection fail count is something to look at [16:46:35] i think that's it for me today [16:46:59] swift is getting PURGE requests [16:47:00] hah [16:47:18] how? [16:49:11] that's a very good question [16:49:34] May 30 16:46:44 ms-fe4 proxy-server 127.0.0.1 10.64.0.149 30/May/2013/16/46/44 PURGE /wikipedia/commons/thumb/archive/f/fc/20070526020221%2521UH-1D_helicopters_in_Vietnam_1966.jpg/120px-UH-1D_helicopters_in_Vietnam_1966.jpg HTTP/1.0 405 - vhtcpd - - 78 - tx9421c156d14b4ce2b0af0929b5321a15 - 0.0005 - [16:49:40] that's cp1027.eqiad.wmnet [16:50:01] more cp* too [16:58:53] i think it may be hitting hit_for_pass objects [17:00:14] ah I see [17:00:30] somehow hit_for_pass objects have been created in the cache [17:00:43] by the default vcl_fetch function [17:01:01] and now those purges are hitting those hit_for_pass objects and therefore bypassing both vcl_hit and vcl_miss [17:01:53] so we need to never let it go into the default vcl_fetch function [17:03:15] is it problematic right now? [17:03:22] no [17:03:25] ok [17:03:26] it's 0.2-0.4% [17:03:28] then i'll look at it tomorrow [17:03:29] yeah [17:03:38] I think perhaps when there's an error for some object [17:03:42] a hitpass is created for that object [17:03:48] and then a purge for that same object hits the hitpass [17:03:49] something like that [17:03:56] weird [17:04:04] errors have a ttl of 0 [17:04:13] and the default vcl_fetch creates a 2 min hitpass in that case [17:06:14] anyway [17:06:20] i'm sick of puppet and varnish now :P [17:06:22] so see you tomorrow [17:06:32] no luck in finding why chash doesn't work in this case (ipv6?) either [17:06:59] maybe it was overloading one box? [17:07:04] check the graphs ;) [17:16:24] mark, just sent a big re-arch document to wikitech [17:37:41] PROBLEM - Host wtp1008 is DOWN: PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 100% [17:38:21] RECOVERY - Host wtp1008 is UP: PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 0.20 ms [17:40:42] was RT system recently reconfigured? its totally impossible to use it now -- no way to search or to do anything useful unless I know the exact ticket i need [17:41:31] I don't think so but what is it exactly that is broken? [17:41:43] yurik - no upgrades [17:42:05] fulltext:your query here [17:42:18] and yes, RT teh suxx [17:42:38] it's the worst …. except for every other system out there ;) [17:43:23] i was pretty happy with redmine - opensource, etc, but that's irrelevant here -- I can't search *at all* [17:43:34] LeslieCarr, i can send you my screencapture [17:43:45] sure [17:44:00] did you change anything recently (chrome upgrade?) [17:45:13] :) chrome upgrades every other day [17:45:43] hmm,, i think that is the problem [17:45:53] FF shows it [17:46:02] guess I should stop using Chrome altogether :) [17:48:38] oh weird [17:48:54] do you have any plugins ? [17:48:58] trying to think how that happened [17:49:01] i am using chrome on os x [17:49:14] might be due to it being nightly :) [17:49:18] oh [17:49:19] that might :p [17:49:35] using "canary" [18:02:27] New patchset: BBlack; "fix a few minor memory bugs" [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66131 [18:02:27] New patchset: BBlack; "upgrade hostname regexes from POSIX ERE to PCRE" [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66132 [18:02:28] New patchset: BBlack; "0.0.6 version bump + NEWS" [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66133 [18:03:35] Change merged: BBlack; [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66131 [18:08:07] Change merged: BBlack; [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66132 [18:08:31] mark, I poked at it for a few hours, but some of this UA stuff is really weird. I'm going to request access to analytics to investigate if we're getting some of them at all, but so far looks like that a lot of obscure devices can't be generalised [18:08:46] Change merged: BBlack; [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66133 [18:09:28] New patchset: BBlack; "Merge branch 'master' into debian" [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (debian) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66134 [18:09:29] New patchset: BBlack; "bump pkg version" [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (debian) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66135 [18:09:52] Change merged: BBlack; [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (debian) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66134 [18:10:16] Change merged: BBlack; [operations/software/varnish/vhtcpd] (debian) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66135 [18:14:44] !log updated vhtcpd deb to 0.0.6-1 on brewster, puppet will upgrade the varnishes [18:14:53] Logged the message, Master [18:28:22] cmjohnson1: hey are you in eqiad ? [18:28:24] New review: Anomie; "(1 comment)" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) C: 1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/62923 [18:28:45] not at the moment but will be there in about 30 mins...whats up? [18:29:14] the link between IIX and psw1-eqiad is down, wanted you to double check it, maybe roll the fiber [18:29:18] want me to put in a ticket ? [18:30:00] also, did the fiber downspouts get put in the racks ? [18:30:05] let me finish what I am doing and I will head over...no ticket needed [18:30:09] ok cool [18:30:13] no, not yet [18:30:23] is the holdup on our side or theirs? [18:30:27] i need to know who i am cursing :) [18:30:50] equinix hasn't responded to our last message...i was going to ping them yesterday but since robh has been dealing with it [18:30:55] ok [18:35:26] PROBLEM - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [18:36:16] RECOVERY - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is OK: HTTP OK: Status line output matched 400 - 336 bytes in 0.137 second response time [18:37:47] PROBLEM - DPKG on celsus is CRITICAL: DPKG CRITICAL dpkg reports broken packages [18:41:03] New review: Aaron Schulz; "MULTIVER_CDB_DIR_HOME was removed I think (replaced with _SOURCE)." [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/62923 [18:44:39] New review: Aaron Schulz; "Nevermind, I mixed that with something else...yet not show how that worked though I vaguely recall r..." [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/62923 [18:45:32] New review: Michał Łazowik; "(1 comment)" [operations/apache-config] (master) C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65443 [18:45:47] RECOVERY - DPKG on celsus is OK: All packages OK [18:50:19] Hey Reedy, do you need anything else for bug 43596 (setup test.wikidata.org)? [18:52:19] lesliecarr: ping [18:52:34] pong! [18:53:09] so i see the link ...no lights [18:53:10] so, did we ever get you a light meter ? [18:53:33] i think so...lemme check [18:53:45] New patchset: Kaldari; "Beta testing using modal video player for more videos on en.wiki" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66143 [18:54:51] lesliecarr no i did not [18:55:31] ok [18:55:37] i am thinking the sfp is bad...we've had a few go out..that would be the 1st think to try [18:55:41] well, let's first try the normal cleaning the fiber and plugging back in [18:55:47] then sfp [18:55:49] then rolling [18:55:53] actually then rolling then sfp [18:56:01] though if you have had a few go bad, trying hte sfp first is ok [18:56:28] PROBLEM - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [18:57:17] RECOVERY - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is OK: HTTP OK: Status line output matched 400 - 336 bytes in 0.179 second response time [18:58:53] well, onto cleaning and then rolling fiber ? [19:01:35] lesliecarr: it's up [19:03:55] yay [19:05:06] lesliecarr: lets take care of rt 5024 now [19:05:23] yay interface up, though l3 connectivity is still down (but no longer your problem) :) [19:05:39] ok [19:05:39] :) [19:07:07] oh..also...the oob is still down to [19:07:30] New patchset: Kaldari; "Turning on Thanks for en.wiki" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66147 [19:08:14] rt 4780 [19:08:14] Change merged: jenkins-bot; [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66147 [19:08:21] grrr yes it is [19:08:28] i need to deal with the vendor on that one [19:08:37] so, 5024, got the new switch ? [19:08:41] yes [19:09:19] cool, gimme a minute :) [19:13:58] New patchset: Yurik; "Removed obsolete Opera IP ranges" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66148 [19:15:25] hi [19:15:27] hi [19:16:15] paravoid: hey [19:18:31] error: unable to unlink old 'RELEASE-NOTES-1.22' (Permission denied) [19:19:12] Hello, can someone of ops pls. set me (again) as project owner for E:UserMerge ? [19:19:18] I was that at SVN times [19:19:26] formal request is here https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Project_ownership#Wikinaut_for_extension_UserMerge [19:19:29] !log replacing asw-c1-eqiad with new switch [19:19:38] Logged the message, Mistress of the network gear. [19:19:41] I already asked around, but Sumanah wasn't in [19:19:55] Wikinaut: ops doesn't usually do that - it's more of a sumanah/^demon thing [19:19:58] I don't know, what happened to her [19:20:08] ok, will contact ^demon [19:20:12] she's probably travelling back from the hackathon [19:20:19] LeslieCarr: someone told me, I should ask ops [19:20:43] such a long time travelling... by boat ? [19:20:46] ;-) [19:20:57] !log powering on new asw-c-eqiad switch -- possible disruption to row c connectivity (low risk) [19:21:06] Logged the message, Mistress of the network gear. [19:21:08] bye [19:21:15] well if you've gone all the way to another country, it's not uncommon to take a few days off to explore it [19:21:19] and then recovering from jetlag [19:21:37] five days ? [19:21:50] ok, why not [19:21:53] bye bye [19:23:11] that was very charming, no? [19:23:36] in the future, be sure to clear your travel plans with Wikinaut [19:23:48] LeslieCarr: do you use git-buildpackage and git-dch ? [19:23:59] i do not :-/ [19:24:04] something i should do in the near future [19:24:06] LeslieCarr: do you know someone who does ? [19:24:52] LeslieCarr: I forgot to say hi and mention I'm from the Analytics team. I'm actually here in search for someone who knows more than me so I can learn from them [19:24:58] i believe paravoid is quite strong with it, however he's in UTC+1 iirc [19:25:27] oh, I'm UTC+3 so I should be able to find some time with him, if he wants to [19:25:31] UTC+2 actually [19:25:33] cool :) [19:30:48] PROBLEM - Host wtp1008 is DOWN: PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 100% [19:31:18] RECOVERY - Host wtp1008 is UP: PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 0.33 ms [19:32:09] utf+3? aint that in the middle of the atlantic? [19:33:19] i'm eest [19:33:28] currently utc+3 [19:33:39] utc+2+dst [19:33:54] oh [19:35:44] paravoid: oh [19:35:55] paravoid: are you busy ? [19:37:24] stupid seasons [19:38:20] what's up? [19:38:36] * AzaToth thought before paravoid was some kind of tool [19:38:38] scap started [19:39:24] hah [19:40:21] * Aaron|home wonders which way to interpret that [19:40:39] I wonder too :) [19:41:06] a protection from void? [19:41:09] paravoid: well, I wouldn't mind if you did some knowledge transfer with me on git-buildpackage. I've heard you know it well [19:41:19] paravoid: but it's your call if you have the time :) [19:41:22] sure [19:41:30] really ? nice :) [19:41:37] when can we do this ? [19:41:41] I can also do the packaging for you if you don't feel like learning all that [19:41:46] now? [19:42:20] well I have some specific questions [19:42:52] no need to do the packaging, otherwise that would make me superfluous [19:43:04] paravoid: hangout ? [19:43:08] I prefer irc [19:43:23] cool [19:44:05] so my understanding is that git-buildpackage assumes at least 2 branches [19:44:08] debian branch [19:44:09] upstream branch [19:44:32] (I assume I won't be needing pristine or patch branches, I want to keep it simple) [19:45:02] I made a buil dusing git-buildpackage, it worked, I have the .deb and all the additional files [19:45:10] correct [19:45:24] I also made the tag using git-buildpackage --git-tag --git-ignore-new [19:45:43] so I basically have a couple of questions [19:46:11] nod [19:46:15] first, there is this misterious(because I haven't found full docs on it) .git/gbp.conf file that I'd like to know more about but can't seem to find more about it [19:46:35] average: you know you can type "git buildpackage" [19:46:35] no need for thre dash [19:47:05] AzaToth: thank you [19:47:11] you can place gbp.conf in debian/ too, if you want to check it in [19:47:20] !log kaldari Started syncing Wikimedia installation... : [19:47:28] Logged the message, Master [19:47:31] you can specify the debian/upstream branch there and a few other options [19:47:44] paravoid: alright, and will it pick up the gbp.conf from there ? [19:47:45] yup [19:47:46] it's not so mysterious, there's a manpage [19:47:55] paravoid: well alright, what manpage please ? [19:48:02] man gbp.conf [19:48:03] gbp.conf :) [19:48:17] ok [19:48:18] * AzaToth waits for the facepalm [19:48:43] yes, I asked a schoolboy question :) [19:48:51] no worries [19:48:53] ツ [19:48:53] ok, hopefuly this next one will be more mature [19:49:21] average: also, you can look at https://github.com/paravoid/gdnsd/tree/debian/debian (paravoid did all the debian/ work there using the git buildpackage style), as an example that covers a lot of different things you might need to do [19:49:45] bblack: I will definitely clone that and look into it [19:49:49] bblack: thanks [19:50:06] so my 2nd question is about git-dch --release --ignore-branch [19:51:29] I tend to prefer hand-crafted changelogs, but up toyou [19:51:30] what about it? [19:51:55] ^ +1, it's easier to just copy/paste the last entry in the changelog and edit the version, commentary, and date [19:52:14] well, I do use dch [19:52:18] just not git-dch :) [19:52:27] git dch -r && deb-commit -ra [19:52:37] Yeah eventually my manual edits will bite me I'm sure, because changelog format is very specific [19:52:38] you probably mean debcommit [19:52:45] AzaToth: what does that do ? [19:53:15] !log asw-c1-eqiad successfully replaced [19:53:20] "debcommit -ra" commit all outstanding changes as release and tags it [19:53:24] Logged the message, Mistress of the network gear. [19:53:40] I don't do -a (it's like git commit -a) but git add manually [19:53:54] then I do "debcommit -n" as a dry-run and debcommit [19:54:04] paravoid: that's right ツ [19:54:36] !log enabling routing-engine on asw-c1-eqiad [19:54:37] so basically there are people that construct debian/changelog from git logs, using git-dch [19:54:46] Logged the message, Mistress of the network gear. [19:54:53] and others that use changelog entries as commit messages (and use debcommit) [19:54:59] I'm in the second category, but ymmv [19:55:05] paravoid: always difficult to decide which way to go [19:55:20] and suddenly you start going both ways [19:55:42] in a lot of real-world cases, the full list of raw commit messages is just too noisy for a debian/changelog or a NEWS update to users [19:55:55] it's nice to just summarize a bit [19:55:59] "Debian is pretty bad at making choices. Almost always, when faced with a need to choose between alternative solutions for the same problem, we choose all of them." [19:56:09] -- http://blog.liw.fi/posts/future-of-linux-distros/ [19:56:19] bblack: if you have many irrelevant commits, then you have used git wrongly [19:56:36] not irrelevant, just not noteworthy to the consumer of the code [19:57:13] (that, and/or the commit messages are more verbose than a public change list needs to be) [19:57:20] yep [19:57:23] agreed [19:57:35] bblack: well, the commit message should be 60 chars or less [19:57:40] the first line that is [19:58:03] sure [20:00:01] bblack: if you want to make sure a commit doesn't end up in the changelog when doing dit-dch, then add "Git-Dch: Ignore" to the commit message [20:00:32] :) [20:00:54] in some philisophical sense, the author of the upstream repo doesn't know or care about debian or Git-Dch [20:01:06] imagine if they had to account for that sort of thing for all N possible platforms :P [20:01:08] heh [20:02:05] I ran some stats on gdnsd v1.8.0 -> v1.8.3 changes to see how they stacked up to my random impression [20:02:42] 38 commits, and 60 lines in the NEWS file covering the same range [20:03:01] and on average there were 2.15 lines of real content per commit message [20:03:52] sorry sorry [20:03:53] so I guess at least in that case, the NEWS entries (which I'm equating to debian/changelog) are actually more numerically verbose than just listing the top line of each commit. [20:03:56] here's my second question [20:04:12] how can git-dch sync with git's messages in non-interactive mode ? [20:04:52] if there is such a thing [20:05:02] git dch -a perhaps [20:05:05] auto mode [20:05:18] got just git dch [20:05:32] !log kaldari Finished syncing Wikimedia installation... : [20:05:40] Logged the message, Master [20:06:03] reading backlog [20:10:14] !log es1001 replacing bad disk (slot 11) [20:10:23] Logged the message, Master [20:13:25] Change merged: Kaldari; [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66143 [20:18:35] thanks binasher for adding the wikidata tables in labs :) [20:19:02] aude: np :) [20:19:22] for the first time, i can see certain stuff :) [20:19:52] so basically whenever the original author makes new changes, I merge the upstream into the debian branch ? [20:20:10] basically, yes [20:20:41] although probably only when they tag a new upstream release, not just when they make a few commits that haven't reached a tag yet. [20:21:03] aude: uh oh.. which stuff? i probably shouldn't have exposed it all then [20:21:04] depends how they manage their master branch really. some may never merge there until a release is due. [20:21:31] bblack: actually in my particular case the original author makes tags like 2.0.1 , 2.0.2 [20:21:45] bblack: I guess there is a way to tell gbp.conf that thos tags are actually upstream tags right ? [20:21:55] bblack: so it can differentiate between debian tags and upstream tags [20:22:07] yes [20:22:25] debian tags look like debian/ think [20:22:33] yes [20:22:41] it's --git-upstream-tag [20:22:53] which is the equivalent of the 'upstream-tag=' setting [20:23:42] so upstream might release a new tag v2.0.2, and then you merge upstream to debian, update debian/changelog (+ any other relevant packaging changes), and then tag your debian branch with debian/2.0.2-1 [20:23:45] --git-upstream-tag=tag-format [20:23:45] use this tag format when looking for tags of upstream versions, [20:23:48] default is upstream/%(version)s. [20:24:08] binasher: only issues was certain tables were never added in toolserver like change dispatch stats [20:24:11] nothing at all private [20:24:34] aude: ok, good :) i looked over the schema again and thought it all looked safe [20:24:50] but it seems like the point of debian tags is for git-dch? I haven't been using git-dch or debian tags, personally. [20:24:55] * aude shall move some tools to labs now [20:25:09] debian tags are useful in the same way upstream tags are [20:25:23] to be able to checkout a particular version, do diffs, bisects etc. [20:25:42] true [20:26:06] aude: btw, the indexes on the wb_changes table can probably be optimized. some combined, some removed. i haven't looked at all of the select cases though [20:28:39] binasher: sure [20:28:54] suggestions for that would be nice [20:34:31] aude: sure, i'll take a closer look at the slave queries against wb_changes and let you know [20:34:42] !log ms-be106 replacing disk slot 6 [20:34:51] Logged the message, Master [20:35:10] binasher: ok [20:47:11] Is deploying on tin still officially broken or not? [20:47:18] Isn't clear from the mailing list thread. [20:47:31] At any rate, there are unstaged changes in wmf5. [20:47:35] So I can't rebase. [20:49:09] ^ reedy [20:49:46] AFAIK no one has fixed it [20:49:57] You've still go to deploy from tin [20:50:11] No idea whos the unstaged changes are [20:50:56] try updating a submodule [20:50:58] One's removing a line of release notes, the other is Wikibase dirty again. [20:50:59] it'll soon tell you [20:51:35] I can't update the submodules, since I can't rebase. [20:51:52] Do you want to try to deal with the unstaged changes, or I gzip to work around it? [20:52:17] well, the release notes no one cares about [20:53:00] I can't blow it away, though (permissions). [20:53:03] So I still can't rebase. [20:53:51] reedy@tin:/a/common/php-1.22wmf4$ git diff [20:53:51] fatal: Could not switch to '/home/wikipedia/common/php-1.22wmf4/extensions/Wikibase/contrib': No such file or directory [20:53:51] fatal: 'git status --porcelain' failed in submodule contrib/easyRdf [20:53:51] fatal: 'git status --porcelain' failed in submodule extensions/Wikibase [20:54:14] That one actually worked earlier. [20:54:16] * greg-g hangs head [20:54:37] New patchset: Dr0ptp4kt; "New IPs for Varnish ACL for Dialog Sri Lanka WAP source IPs." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66166 [20:54:44] Reedy, did you fix wmf5? [20:54:47] No [20:55:02] -rw-rw-r-- 1 reedy wikidev 22958 May 27 16:30 RELEASE-NOTES-1.21 [20:55:02] -rw-rw-r-- 1 reedy wikidev 12973 May 27 16:30 RELEASE-NOTES-1.22 [20:55:06] New patchset: MaxSem; "Serve mobile logos from bits to avoid charging Zero users for them" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66167 [20:55:44] MaxSem: ugh [20:55:57] paravoid, ? [20:56:27] the bits thing [20:56:30] PROBLEM - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [20:56:50] Submodule path 'extensions/GuidedTour': checked out 'b1ebe53953dc50a0c8e4ae1933f99246de09d7ab' [20:56:50] Submodule 'modules/externals/mediawiki.libs.guiders/mediawiki.libs.guiders.submodule' (https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/p/mediawiki/extensions/GuidedTour.git) registered for path 'modules/externals/mediawiki.libs.guiders/mediawiki.libs.guiders.submodule' [20:56:50] Submodule path 'modules/externals/mediawiki.libs.guiders/mediawiki.libs.guiders.submodule': checked out '7c38207d894a810aafdf048d28172036bfdd2002' [20:56:50] error: The requested URL returned error: 403 while accessing https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/p/mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase.git/info/refs [20:56:51] was there a discussion about serving images from bits? [20:57:08] is there a problem about it? [20:57:20] RECOVERY - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is OK: HTTP OK: Status line output matched 400 - 336 bytes in 0.131 second response time [20:57:27] New review: Dr0ptp4kt; "IPs verified against APNIC." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66166 [20:57:36] I think someone else (probably E2, who we're letting piggy-back) updated wmf5. [20:57:48] So I don't need to rebase currently, but I think we will once spagewmf's cherry-picks go in. [21:01:32] New review: Yurik; "Why not just merge it together with the other ACL range? That's how they are stored in zero config p..." [operations/puppet] (production) C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66166 [21:02:30] PROBLEM - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [21:03:20] RECOVERY - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is OK: HTTP OK: Status line output matched 400 - 336 bytes in 0.127 second response time [21:08:24] New patchset: Dr0ptp4kt; "New IPs for Varnish ACL for Dialog Sri Lanka WAP source IPs." [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66166 [21:18:47] binasher: tmh100[12] seem to have more ' Lua script error: ERR operation not permitted' errors than others [21:20:12] PROBLEM - Host mw16 is DOWN: PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 100% [21:21:29] is someone working on mw16 ? [21:21:49] or should i kick it ? [21:22:32] PROBLEM - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [21:23:07] !log powercycling mw16 [21:23:15] Logged the message, Mistress of the network gear. [21:24:22] RECOVERY - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is OK: HTTP OK: Status line output matched 400 - 336 bytes in 0.149 second response time [21:25:23] RECOVERY - Host mw16 is UP: PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 26.54 ms [21:27:32] PROBLEM - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [21:28:23] RECOVERY - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is OK: HTTP OK: Status line output matched 400 - 336 bytes in 0.133 second response time [21:29:47] greg-g, Reedy, now I really need to rebase or pull into wmf5. [21:29:55] We have core changes that need to go in before we scap. [21:30:58] :/ [21:31:48] superm401: is it a permission issue? [21:32:06] Yes, there are unstaged changes. [21:32:16] greg-g, can you blow them away? [21:32:32] One is just notes, while the other is unstaged changes in wikibase. [21:32:40] Don't know how it happened, but it's definitely wrong. [21:34:24] greg-g, something's seriously wrong, since I'm in wikidev, and the file is: [21:34:31] -rw-rw-r-- 1 reedy wikidev 13K May 27 16:30 RELEASE-NOTES-1.22 [21:34:35] So i should be able to do: [21:35:02] greg-g, there's no write permission for group on wmf5. [21:35:10] That could be the problem. [21:35:20] opsen: help? [21:37:08] Reedy or anyone with root, tin: /a/common/php-1.22wmf5 needs `chmod g+w` [21:38:47] at this point pinging people is typically justified... so ahoy andrewbogott, bblack, Coren, mutante, ottomata [21:39:06] rfarrand, do you see anyone in Operations? We have a problem on the deployment host [21:39:14] Can do. [21:39:16] I'm here, lemme catch up [21:39:22] thanks guys [21:39:32] Oh, coren, you're on top of it? [21:39:51] appreciate it [21:40:15] andrewbogott: Yeah, I was around. [21:40:20] oh cool [21:40:23] i just looked at this [21:40:28] thanks coren [21:41:10] Thanks, Coren [21:41:17] spagewmf: You should be all set. [21:41:29] yup, thx [21:41:58] Oh, good, I didn't have to mess with Wikibase (still no idea what's up there). [21:42:11] Resetting the release notes to HEAD was enough. [21:42:25] kaldari, we're good to go, you ready? [21:42:43] yep [21:42:56] There are 2 config changes merged for us [21:43:09] spagewmf, I think we're ready to scap. [21:43:11] superm401 won't scap push the changed Wikibase files in wmf5? [21:43:12] touching both InitializeSettings and CommonSettings [21:43:37] spagewmf, yeah. [21:43:53] if you're syncing files individually, you'll want to sync InitializeSettings first [21:43:59] It shouldn't be there to begin with (the directory is actually dirty). [21:44:17] Does someone think I should reset the submodule (and contents) to what core HEAD's pointing to? [21:44:24] Wikibase that is. [21:44:48] kaldari, I have to scap (or at least do i18n update, but preferrably scap) because of an EventLogging change. [21:45:15] that's fine. scap will copy them simultaneously [21:45:31] Yeah, I'm going ahead. [21:53:38] superm401 wmf4 and wmf5 have different Wikibase versions, so it's unclear what's intended by the changes. aude, do you know what's up? [21:53:59] Even if it's intended to be different, it shoudn't be dirty (uncommitted changes) [21:54:37] !log mflaschen Started syncing Wikimedia installation... : Deployment for E3 and E2 [21:54:40] I agree. It looks like the changed files are on the cluster, e.g. /usr/local/apache/common/php-1.22wmf5/extensions/Wikibase/lib/includes/SnakFormatter.php , so our scap isn't changing anything [21:54:46] Logged the message, Master [22:07:32] !log mflaschen Finished syncing Wikimedia installation... : Deployment for E3 and E2 [22:07:40] Logged the message, Master [22:15:51] spagewmf: whaever is deployed now is okay [22:16:11] should be my updates from yesterday [22:17:48] aude, good to know, but someone needs to clean up /a/common/php-1.22wmf5/extensions/Wikibase on tin , it's out of sync with git [22:19:16] yes they do [22:19:26] Reedy: ^ ? greg-g ^ [22:19:39] spagewmf: Because git is fscked [22:19:39] * aude does not have access to handle that [22:19:42] :/ [22:20:04] seems the new system is problematic [22:20:08] permissions etc [22:20:24] New review: Daniel Kinzler; "thanks for spotting that Michał!" [operations/apache-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65443 [22:20:52] I'm not sure why permissions problems gives a http 403 [22:21:29] TimStarling: just in case you don't real the full backlog, there have been a few permissions/git issues on Tin today :/ [22:21:34] s/real/read/ [22:21:59] yes, ok [22:22:05] I didn't quite get around to that one yesterday [22:22:28] PROBLEM - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [22:22:56] TimStarling: thanks. [22:24:19] RECOVERY - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is OK: HTTP OK: Status line output matched 400 - 336 bytes in 0.127 second response time [22:26:15] what's a command that doesn't work currently? [22:27:02] is the problem just group write bits? [22:28:07] reedy@tin:/a/common/php-1.22wmf5$ git submodule update extensions/Wikibase/ [22:28:07] error: The requested URL returned error: 403 while accessing https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/p/mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase.git/info/refs [22:28:07] fatal: HTTP request failed [22:28:07] Unable to fetch in submodule path 'extensions/Wikibase' [22:28:25] It's replicable outside of /a/common on tin [22:30:28] PROBLEM - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [22:32:18] RECOVERY - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is OK: HTTP OK: Status line output matched 400 - 336 bytes in 0.128 second response time [22:33:27] Reedy: in your .gitconfig you had: [22:33:30] [http] [22:33:31] proxy = http://url-downloader.wikimedia.org:8080 [22:33:37] I commented it out and then the clone worked [22:34:09] are there submodules that we need that aren't on the internal network? [22:34:18] There was [22:34:33] But Wikibase put theres into gerrit [22:36:06] if there are, you can configure the proxy on a per-remote basis, using remote..proxy [22:46:27] PROBLEM - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [22:47:17] RECOVERY - Puppetmaster HTTPS on stafford is OK: HTTP OK: Status line output matched 400 - 336 bytes in 0.125 second response time [23:02:27] PROBLEM - DPKG on ms-fe1002 is CRITICAL: DPKG CRITICAL dpkg reports broken packages [23:02:57] PROBLEM - DPKG on ms2 is CRITICAL: DPKG CRITICAL dpkg reports broken packages [23:04:57] uh oh [23:04:57] RECOVERY - DPKG on ms2 is OK: All packages OK [23:05:05] for crying out loud [23:05:13] ceph pages about to go off [23:05:30] Aaron|home: where did you see the lua exceptions? [23:05:51] binasher: just errors, in redis.log [23:06:58] PROBLEM - LVS HTTP IPv4 on ms-fe.eqiad.wmnet is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [23:07:32] PROBLEM - Apache HTTP on mw1160 is CRITICAL: Connection timed out [23:07:32] PROBLEM - Apache HTTP on mw1154 is CRITICAL: Connection timed out [23:07:33] PROBLEM - HTTP radosgw on ms-fe1002 is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [23:07:33] PROBLEM - HTTP radosgw on ms-fe1003 is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [23:07:36] uhoh, what happened ? [23:07:43] PROBLEM - LVS HTTP IPv4 on rendering.svc.eqiad.wmnet is CRITICAL: Connection timed out [23:07:49] I'm on it [23:07:51] see above [23:07:52] PROBLEM - Apache HTTP on mw1153 is CRITICAL: Connection timed out [23:07:53] PROBLEM - Apache HTTP on mw1158 is CRITICAL: Connection timed out [23:07:53] PROBLEM - HTTP radosgw on ms-fe1001 is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [23:07:53] PROBLEM - HTTP radosgw on ms-fe1004 is CRITICAL: CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds [23:08:02] PROBLEM - Apache HTTP on mw1155 is CRITICAL: Connection timed out [23:08:02] PROBLEM - Apache HTTP on mw1159 is CRITICAL: Connection timed out [23:08:07] ok, let me know if you want a hand paravoid [23:08:09] 2013-05-30 23:04:48.815916 mon.0 10.64.0.167:6789/0 1200484 : [INF] osdmap e181872: 144 osds: 114 up, 142 in [23:08:13] this happened [23:08:43] PROBLEM - Apache HTTP on mw1156 is CRITICAL: Connection timed out [23:08:43] PROBLEM - Apache HTTP on mw1157 is CRITICAL: Connection timed out [23:10:03] Aaron|home: it would be nice if those log lines noted the associated redis server for those errors instead of just the client hostname [23:10:27] RECOVERY - HTTP radosgw on ms-fe1001 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 311 bytes in 0.006 second response time [23:10:27] RECOVERY - Apache HTTP on mw1158 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 747 bytes in 0.059 second response time [23:10:27] RECOVERY - Apache HTTP on mw1157 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 747 bytes in 0.064 second response time [23:10:37] RECOVERY - Apache HTTP on mw1153 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 747 bytes in 0.068 second response time [23:10:37] RECOVERY - Apache HTTP on mw1156 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 747 bytes in 0.065 second response time [23:10:37] RECOVERY - LVS HTTP IPv4 on rendering.svc.eqiad.wmnet is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 62653 bytes in 0.254 second response time [23:10:39] binasher: right, though it must be the primary redis job queue server [23:10:42] RECOVERY - DPKG on ms-fe1002 is OK: All packages OK [23:10:42] nothing else uses lua [23:10:47] RECOVERY - HTTP radosgw on ms-fe1004 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 311 bytes in 0.005 second response time [23:10:51] New patchset: Hazard-SJ; "Disable 'toc-floated' user option on hevoy" [operations/mediawiki-config] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/61058 [23:10:57] RECOVERY - Apache HTTP on mw1160 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 747 bytes in 0.045 second response time [23:10:58] RECOVERY - Apache HTTP on mw1159 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 747 bytes in 0.057 second response time [23:10:58] RECOVERY - HTTP radosgw on ms-fe1003 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 311 bytes in 0.277 second response time [23:10:58] RECOVERY - HTTP radosgw on ms-fe1002 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 311 bytes in 0.623 second response time [23:10:58] RECOVERY - Apache HTTP on mw1154 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 747 bytes in 0.070 second response time [23:10:58] RECOVERY - LVS HTTP IPv4 on ms-fe.eqiad.wmnet is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 311 bytes in 0.005 second response time [23:11:25] RECOVERY - Apache HTTP on mw1155 is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 747 bytes in 0.067 second response time [23:11:34] Aaron|home: those look like auth errors, despite the lua bit. is lua the first thing being run after auth? [23:12:05] PROBLEM - NTP on ssl3003 is CRITICAL: NTP CRITICAL: No response from NTP server [23:12:33] binasher: most likely [23:14:44] Aaron|home: i think we should upgrade to the latest version of redis 2.6 before delving any further. which begs the question…how do we do that without having the federated jobq in service? [23:15:57] we should get the second redis jobq pair in service [23:16:28] without federation one would have to switch to a new box and run the migration script [23:18:16] bleh.. https://rt.wikimedia.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4960 hasn't gone anywhere [23:22:41] we could borrow a spare db host for a day [23:22:59] but regardless, should get the federated queue in service for redundancy purposes [23:23:35] PROBLEM - DPKG on potassium is CRITICAL: DPKG CRITICAL dpkg reports broken packages [23:25:39] RECOVERY - DPKG on potassium is OK: All packages OK [23:34:05] PROBLEM - DPKG on searchidx2 is CRITICAL: DPKG CRITICAL dpkg reports broken packages [23:35:55] RECOVERY - DPKG on searchidx2 is OK: All packages OK [23:47:14] New patchset: Faidon; "Ceph: update ceph-add-disk for newer Ceph" [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66187 [23:48:31] Change merged: Faidon; [operations/puppet] (production) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/66187 [23:49:08] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on db1032 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:08] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on erzurumi is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:08] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on db45 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:08] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on lvs1006 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:09] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on lvs1004 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:09] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on lvs1005 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:09] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on mw1171 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:10] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on ms-fe3001 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:10] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on pdf1 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:11] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on mc15 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:11] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on pdf2 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:12] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on virt3 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:12] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on virt4 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:49:13] PROBLEM - Puppet freshness on virt1 is CRITICAL: No successful Puppet run in the last 10 hours [23:54:29] !log mw1171 appears to have a bad hard drive [23:54:38] Logged the message, Mistress of the network gear. [23:55:16] Oh my. mark shouted in scrollback. I'm not sure I've ever seen that. [23:55:29] Oh, it was a joke. [23:55:57] !log kaldari Started syncing Wikimedia installation... : [23:56:05] Logged the message, Master [23:56:38] RECOVERY - DPKG on db45 is OK: All packages OK [23:57:59] !log fixing packages/security upgrades on db45 [23:58:01] touching both InitializeSettings and CommonSettings # Sssssssss [23:58:07] Logged the message, Mistress of the network gear.