[04:44:03] 10Multimedia, 10Commons, 10Operations, 10Traffic, and 2 others: Disable serving unpatrolled new files to Wikipedia Zero users - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167400#3350562 (10Dispenser) The ongoing abuse has costs: in disk space 1 TB wasted so far, for administrators blocking dozens of accounts and d... [05:25:16] 10Multimedia, 10Commons, 10Operations, 10Traffic, and 2 others: Disable serving unpatrolled new files to Wikipedia Zero users - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167400#3350573 (10Marostegui) p:05Triage>03Normal [05:25:28] 10Multimedia, 10Commons, 10Operations, 10Traffic, and 2 others: Disable serving unpatrolled new files to Wikipedia Zero users - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167400#3350574 (10zhuyifei1999) >>! In T167400#3350562, @Dispenser wrote: > Then (somehow) configure Varnish to understand WP0 IP ranges It [[h... [06:55:01] 10Multimedia, 10Commons, 10Operations, 10Traffic, and 2 others: Disable serving unpatrolled new files to Wikipedia Zero users - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167400#3331800 (10Bawolff) > Wikipedia Zero traffic is tied to IP addresses, not users. So it definitely could be performant. Have MediaWiki set... [09:35:00] 10Multimedia, 10Commons, 10MediaWiki-File-management: Create an ImageHash for all Commons images - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167947#3350861 (10zhuyifei1999) [11:51:12] 10Multimedia, 10Commons, 10MediaWiki-File-management: Create an ImageHash for all Commons images - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167947#3350834 (10Bawolff) A bigger question is where to store the hashes. Usually perceptual hashes are compared using hamming distance. This is sort of inefficient to do in... [11:52:32] 10Multimedia, 10Commons, 10MediaWiki-File-management: Allow searching for similar images on Commons via perceptual hashes - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167947#3351125 (10Bawolff) [11:54:47] 10Multimedia, 10Commons, 10MediaWiki-File-management: Allow searching for similar images on Commons via perceptual hashes - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167947#3351127 (10Bawolff) Maybe dupe of T121797? [12:38:53] 10Multimedia, 103d, 10Design: Upon click of raster image of 3D file on File: page, instantiate Media Viewer - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167730#3351185 (10matthiasmullie) a:03matthiasmullie [13:23:28] 10Multimedia, 10Commons, 10Support-and-Safety, 10Wikimedia-General-or-Unknown, 10Zero: Commons and to a lesser extent other projects used as video hoster / file sharing site by Wikipedia Zero - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T129845#3351290 (10Tarawneh) I am following some related facebook groups, and... [13:57:11] 10Multimedia, 103d, 10Design: Upon click of raster image of 3D file on File: page, instantiate Media Viewer - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167730#3351398 (10matthiasmullie) Do we also want the "File history" thumb images to open in MMV when clicked? [14:25:00] 10Multimedia, 103d, 10Design: Upon click of raster image of 3D file on File: page, instantiate Media Viewer - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167730#3351456 (10dr0ptp4kt) ^ @Nirzar would you please weigh in? If so, let's file a separate task for that part. I believe the click handler will be sufficiently... [16:56:52] matthiasmullie: Are you able to render thumbnails in 3d2png right now? [16:57:00] I'm getting some weird error from the canvas library I think [16:59:07] I guess it still rendered. Weird. [17:10:52] marktraceur https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/358905/ [17:11:11] OK, good, I'll get to that very soon [17:11:13] I assume that's the reason for your issues :p [17:11:19] it was the cause of mine anyway :p [17:17:46] matthiasmullie: Well, I'm looking at this now, and...I'm not sure why that fix is necessary [17:18:11] matthiasmullie: The version of three-stl-loader installed by my npm install is...not what you're dealing with in this patch [17:18:27] Maybe I need to run npm update or something [17:19:01] I had installed a fresh vagrant, where that new version was automatically installed [17:19:14] but I guess it's not what's causing your issues then [17:19:24] Yeah but maybe the update will! [17:19:38] Not really [17:19:42] But at least the script works now [17:20:02] matthiasmullie: So my next question is, should we really push this fix out, or just change the package.json to specify the earlier version, that we actually support? [17:23:02] could work either way [17:24:21] I prefer to use latest & greatest, but it wouldn't be hard to convince me that this one is not thoroughly tested yet (and has proven to have bad BC support) :p [17:24:38] regardless of what we do here, we should probably specify versions anyway [17:24:45] whichever it ends up being [17:28:20] matthiasmullie: Yeah, at least we should change from 'latest' to '^1.0.5' [17:28:34] But then we need to update the deploy repo too! [17:28:44] I haven't gone through that yet so I'm not sure what it takes [17:44:32] you mean re-deploy to beta? [17:44:55] I could probably do that tomorrow if you want [17:56:28] OK.