[07:47:01] 06Multimedia, 06Commons, 10GLAM-Tech, 10Structured-Multimedia-Data, and 2 others: [Epic] Store media information for files on Wikimedia Commons as structured data - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T68108#2504481 (10Smalyshev) [07:53:34] 06Multimedia, 06Commons, 10GLAM-Tech, 10Structured-Multimedia-Data, and 2 others: [Epic] Store media information for files on Wikimedia Commons as structured data - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T68108#2504501 (10Smalyshev) [13:26:53] 06Multimedia, 06Commons, 10MediaWiki-File-management: JPEG with CMYK colourspace not thumbnailed correctly - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T38346#2505037 (10Perhelion) 05Resolved>03Open I reopened this because https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gemeindewappen_Obdach_gro%C3%9F-2016.jpg is missing... [13:32:26] 06Multimedia, 06Commons, 10MediaWiki-File-management: JPEG with CMYK colourspace not thumbnailed correctly - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T38346#2505063 (10Perhelion) [16:12:08] MatmaRex: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T120867#2497625 was singularly unhelpful, BTW. [16:16:37] James_F: i disagree. everything ew've done up to that point was, though. [16:17:02] From a community point of view I considered MatmaRex' comment quite helpful to have available options described. [16:17:11] If other information would be more helpful, anyone (like you) is free to add a comment to provide such other information. [16:17:37] Well, most of the discussion on the task is off-topic. [16:18:17] And rather than say "hey, I'm going to set off a bomb if that's OK" and ask, you just kicked the hornets' nest. [16:19:35] You didn't say "As the data shows, cross-wiki has the same problems as other upload tools – users actively ignore copyright warnings. What ideas do we have to fix that?". [16:20:01] i was saying that for seven months, nothing i've done helped much, and no one else is working on it. [16:20:04] You effectively endorsed the idea that if we switch cross-wiki uploads off magically the uploads will all be OK. [16:20:12] if we're unable to support the feature, i can't in good faith argue to keep it enabled. [16:20:21] MatmaRex: WTF do you think you working on AbuseFilter was, if not supporting it? [16:20:22] and we clearly are unable, if i'm the only developer working on it [16:20:43] MatmaRex: prtksxna was working on a new A/B test (but stopped, though I don't know why). [16:20:55] MatmaRex: Volker was working on new copyright text ideas. [16:21:07] because working on the A/B test was not our goal, neither in theory nor in practice… [16:21:17] Yes it was? [16:21:26] right, six months ago [16:21:28] It was our only objective around uploads. [16:21:43] No? [16:22:43] Maybe it would have been helpful to raise this concern in the retrospective we just had. [16:23:18] and anyway, like i also wrote, i have had enough of working on this. so that leaves zero developers working on it. [16:23:30] i've been trying to raise this concern continuously and it doesn't seem like a concern for anyone else [16:24:13] :-( [16:24:18] It's my main damn concern. [16:24:34] And now you've just made things much worse. [17:22:08] (03CR) 10Bartosz Dziewoński: "Jon: Please see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Mobile_edits_and_uploads.2C_continued – is there any reason not to" [extensions/UploadWizard] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/296832 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T97169) (owner: 10Bartosz Dziewoński) [17:38:54] (03CR) 10Jdlrobson: "You have a +1 from me but I won't be +2ing it. For historical reasons, I do not wish to be further associated with uploading on Commons bu" [extensions/UploadWizard] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/296832 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T97169) (owner: 10Bartosz Dziewoński)