[06:26:20] 10Phabricator, 06Community-Liaisons, 07Documentation: Learning Pattern for Phabricator as a management tool for non-technical projects - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133268#2238168 (10Qgil) I am still wondering whether a Learning Pattern is the solution to the problem @Jopparn has. I am not against wri... [07:39:12] 10Phabricator, 10Developer-Relations (Apr-Jun-2016): Identify archived projects with tasks open that have no other projects assigned - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133649#2238302 (10Aklapper) [07:52:10] 10Phabricator, 10Developer-Relations (Apr-Jun-2016): Identify archived projects with tasks open that have no other projects assigned - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133649#2238302 (10Qgil) Good idea, also useful for our sprints, hackathons, and outreach programs. I try to assure that no tasks with other p... [08:56:25] 10Diffusion, 06Developer-Relations, 10Gerrit: Implement a real way to request new repositories - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T38269#2238542 (10Qgil) At this point I would remove the #gerrit tag and focus on a good solution for #diffusion. [09:29:40] 10Phabricator, 06Release-Engineering-Team: Clean up tasks in archived #Staging Phabricator project - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133529#2238678 (10hashar) Since #Staging project is abandoned, can we mass close its tasks ? https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/query/12OMlv5TPW6b/#R [10:07:16] 10Phabricator: Consider modifying H153 to reduce mass task spam - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133111#2238795 (10TerraCodes) >>! In T133111#2231128, @Quiddity wrote: >>>! In T133111#2226446, @TerraCodes wrote: >>>>! In T133111#2226432, @Peachey88 wrote: >>>>>! In T133111#2226417, @TerraCodes wrote: >>>> Th... [10:14:42] 10Phabricator: Add global Herald rule to remove @wikibugs-l-list from subscribers - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T126866#2238841 (10MarcoAurelio) 05Open>03declined [12:09:25] 10Phabricator, 10Phabricator-Upstream: Phabricator Mock description rendering doesn't take list markup into account - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133366#2229523 (10epriestley) This should be fixed upstream by . (This also fixed the mock description itself not bein... [12:24:03] 10Phabricator, 10Developer-Relations (Apr-Jun-2016): Identify archived projects with tasks open that have no other projects assigned - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133649#2239166 (10Aklapper) p:05Triage>03Low My brain capacity (and SQL skills) to come up with a proper sub-query to only have output li... [13:02:04] 10Phabricator, 10Phabricator-Upstream: Phabricator Mock description rendering doesn't take list markup into account - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133366#2239225 (10Aklapper) [13:02:06] 10Phabricator, 05Release, 07WorkType-Maintenance: Next Phabricator Upgrade | 2016-04-28 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T128009#2239226 (10Aklapper) [14:45:58] 10Diffusion, 06Developer-Relations, 10Gerrit: Implement a real way to request new repositories - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T38269#2239658 (10Dzahn) Maybe wait with deleting the Gerrit tag until Gerrit is actually shutdown and the server decom'ed. [15:34:49] 10Phabricator, 06Community-Liaisons, 07Documentation: Learning Pattern for Phabricator as a management tool for non-technical projects - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133268#2239864 (10Jopparn) Hi, my question to Elitre was about best practices when we want to include also non-technical tasks into the m... [16:13:46] 10Phabricator, 06Release-Engineering-Team: Clean up tasks in archived #Staging Phabricator project - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133529#2240115 (10demon) I declined most of them now. Last couple of them might still be useful or be repurposed. [16:17:00] twentyafterfour: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/Marmase/ status: available, but on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133702 I've a handle-availability-disabled class [16:18:11] Dereckson: odd, I'm not sure what's up with that [16:18:32] the user isn't disabled as far as I can tell [16:19:54] When I've edit the task, I noticed it appears disabled too. [17:11:38] 10Phabricator, 10Gerrit: When clicking on dependent changes in new gerrit change screen, link opens in phabricator, not gerrit - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133713#2240351 (10Bawolff) [17:13:57] Dereckson, twentyafterfour: That is because the user never verified their account (via email). [17:14:04] See "Unverified" in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/people/?after=2154 [17:14:13] ahhh, thanks andre__ [17:14:23] np :) [17:26:21] ok [17:26:36] I wonder if notifications work without mail confirmation. [17:32:24] unlikely [17:35:44] "You never confirmed your mail address, you've been added as watcher in some project, here 100 mails" [17:41:00] Just like my physical mailbox when I come home after months. :P [17:50:40] * valhallasw`cloud sets up a phab-to-letters gateway for andre__ [18:00:51] 💗! [18:03:52] in the US that is so bad [18:04:23] you get all this spam mail addressed to "our neighbor" and tons of supermarket offers and the mailman says i cant really opt-out [18:04:47] then the mailbox is full and they kept your actual 2 letters you cared about at the post office and you have to go pick it up or throw it away after 28 days [18:04:53] shuts up again [20:12:23] mutante: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Junk_Mail [20:13:36] bd808: lol, i think i may have received actual Pottery Barn too [20:17:12] bd808: https://www.catalogchoice.org/login ? hmm [20:20:12] lol " I want to receive occasional news from CatalogChoice Mail Preference Service via email. " [20:30:15] 10Phabricator: Consider modifying H153 to reduce mass task spam - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133111#2241277 (10Quiddity) @TerraCodes Oh, right, my mistake, I forgot about web-notifications (I disable them all). You can search for * all tasks you're subscribed to, https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniph... [22:08:21] would this be the place to ask a differential question? [22:08:47] cwd: i think so, yea [22:09:35] i'm confused about the diff here: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/D214?vs=603&id=605&whitespace=ignore-most [22:10:10] diffing the two most recent patches somehow is different that the contents of the most recent patch: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/D214?id=605 [22:10:15] *than [22:12:00] what the first diff shows happening to comp.py is the opposite of what happened to that file in 603 [22:12:14] and that file is not changed between 603 and 605 [22:18:57] cwd: hmm [22:20:50] cwd: comp.py is missing from 605 as far as I can see? [22:21:27] twentyafterfour: yep no changes to that file [22:21:37] I'm not sure how that would happen [22:21:46] did you rebase somewhere inbetween? [22:22:24] hrm no i'm pretty sure there's nothing hidden in between [22:22:45] when i diff the commits locally i see what i'd expect [22:22:47] I first read that as "would this be the place to as a differential equation?"....which, I suppose, it would be as good a channel as any [22:24:52] twentyafterfour: i do not have a good mental model of the relationship between diffs™ and commits though so i may be missing something [22:25:46] cwd: every time you run arc diff it creates a new diff against the base revision (which is either HEAD^ or your current merge-base depending on your arc configuration) [22:27:03] twentyafterfour: but that diff can be part of a previous one right? revisions within a diff? for instance i have --updated D214 several times [22:27:03] D214: use config file instead of CLI options - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/D214 [22:31:10] i'm referring to D214 as a diff but the revisions are labeled diffs in the UI...anyway i imagine those pretty well map to commits, depending on your workflow, but i've been doing arc diff whenever i commit [22:31:11] D214: use config file instead of CLI options - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/D214 [22:31:33] what is a thing like D214 called? [22:31:33] D214: use config file instead of CLI options - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/D214 [22:31:38] thank you stashbot [22:40:07] cwd: phabricator calls those 'revisions' [22:40:34] and a diff is one iteration of your revision, which doesn't exactly map to a commit, a diff maps to the state of your repo at the time when you ran arc diff [22:40:44] aah i get it now, revision update history [22:40:46] works for me [22:41:02] if you amend the same commit and run `arc diff` again on the same revision then you'll get a new diff [22:41:19] but... a revision can have several commits, assuming you commit without amending [22:41:26] gotcha [22:41:41] so if you arc diff every time you commit, your diffs will be the same changes as your commits right? [22:41:47] so 1 revision -> many diffs of many commits [22:41:55] cwd: right [22:42:01] or that's how it should work [22:42:11] and a revision can map to a branch [22:42:18] if you want to work that way [22:42:23] yep [22:42:50] that's what i've been trying to achieve [22:43:03] in fact arc encourages you to work on a feature branch, then 1 revision = one branch, and each diff on that revision is just a snapshot of the branch history at a point in time when you updated the diff [22:43:15] and i thought it was all working but i'm confused about that 603vs605 output [22:43:28] yeah I don't know how that happened... [22:43:49] i think the state of the code is fine, maybe there's a bug in the diff view [22:44:23] as long as the latest revision shows the changes you want, when compared to the base, then you are ok [22:44:41] the intermediate diffs are only for reference in case you want to look back at what changed [22:44:47] so yeah it might be a bug in the diff view [22:44:57] I have no clue how to debug that part [22:45:18] twentyafterfour: that's the other thing that's confusing me, if i diff the latest patch set with base using those radio buttons, i'm actually only seeing the latest diff's changes [22:45:28] i would think i'd see everything that hasn't merged yet [22:45:46] but that might be a wrong assumption [22:47:34] for instance https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/D214 is the same diff as https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/D214?id=605 even though the state of the radio buttons makes it look like the former link would include all the changes [23:35:14] 10Phabricator, 10Phlogiston (Burnup-Support), 15User-JAufrecht: Points data not completely available in dump used by Phlogiston - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T127766#2241727 (10JAufrecht) Still not getting points correctly. See https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T132495 for an example; has 40 points in... [23:35:28] 10Phabricator, 10Phlogiston (Burnup-Support), 15User-JAufrecht: Points data not completely available in dump used by Phlogiston - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T127766#2241728 (10JAufrecht) a:03JAufrecht [23:48:47] 10Phabricator, 10Phlogiston (Burnup-Support), 15User-JAufrecht: Points data not completely available in dump used by Phlogiston - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T127766#2241745 (10JAufrecht)