[06:25:26] 3Phabricator: Add help link to explain meaning of priority levels - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87411#990654 (10FriedhelmW) 3NEW [06:34:19] 3Phabricator: Decide on "Needs Volunteer" Priority field value in Phabricator - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78617#990676 (10FriedhelmW) Keep it as it is. "Needs Volunteer" is self-explanatory even for non native English. [08:02:29] 3Phabricator: Change "CC" to "Subscribers" - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87421#990782 (10FriedhelmW) 3NEW [08:15:38] 3Phabricator: Change "CC" to "Subscribers" - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87421#990797 (10FriedhelmW) [08:32:33] 3Phabricator: Change "CC" to "Subscribers" - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87421#990802 (10FriedhelmW) Google Translator is unable to translate "CC" to German. And it is not a "carbon" copy. [11:00:42] 3Phabricator: Create project for MediaWiki-extensions-WikibaseView - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87428#990882 (10adrianheine) 3NEW [13:52:19] 3Phabricator.org: Change "CC" to "Subscribers" - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87421#990989 (10Qgil) [13:54:26] 3Phabricator.org: Change "CC" to "Subscribers" - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87421#990991 (10Qgil) p:5Triage>3Volunteer? The task view page does say "Subscribers", so it would be consistent to say "Subscribers" also in the task creation page, the Action dropdown, and probably other uses of this field... [14:00:40] 3Phabricator: One touch assign button on phabricator - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87436#990997 (1001tonythomas) 3NEW [14:46:59] 3Phabricator.org: Send Email when last comment was edited - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87437#991014 (10FriedhelmW) 3NEW [15:20:37] 3Phabricator.org: Send Email when last comment was edited - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87437#991046 (10Qgil) Only the last comment? [15:23:17] 3Phabricator: One touch assign button on phabricator - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87436#991048 (10Qgil) We also have `Action > Reassign / Claim` in the comment area. I don't think upstream is going to consider adding another option in the quite populated task menu, when there are already to ways to clai... [15:23:41] 3Phabricator.org: One touch assign button on phabricator - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87436#991049 (10Qgil) [15:32:42] 3Phabricator.org: Email notifications should bundle events as the web interface does - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T85305#991054 (10Qgil) New task upstream, related: [[ https://secure.phabricator.com/T7013 | Support message batching in the notification pipeline ]] [15:34:53] 3Phabricator: Change color of #Patch-For-Review project to something more unique - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87226#991055 (10Qgil) James, now I don't know whether you are being serious of ironic. [15:48:11] 3Phabricator.org: Send Email when last comment was edited - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87437#991072 (10FriedhelmW) The user could be asked whether notifications should be sent or not. [15:50:28] 3Phabricator.org: Send Email when last comment was edited - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87437#991073 (10Qgil) What I mean is that I don't see a reason to receive a notification only when the last comment has been edited, and not any other comment in a task. [15:52:31] 3Phabricator.org: Send Email when comment was edited - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87437#991074 (10FriedhelmW) [15:52:55] 3Phabricator.org: One touch assign button on phabricator - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87436#991077 (1001tonythomas) >>! In T87436#991048, @Qgil wrote: > We also have `Action > Reassign / Claim` in the comment area. > > I don't think upstream is going to consider adding another option in the quite popula... [15:52:56] 3Phabricator.org: Send Email when comment was edited - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87437#991014 (10FriedhelmW) I changed title and description. [19:27:59] 3Phabricator: Change color of #Patch-For-Review project to something more unique - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87226#991470 (10Jdforrester-WMF) >>! In T87226#991055, @Qgil wrote: > James, now I don't know whether you are being serious of ironic. Serious. Gerrit is currently where code review happens, so... [21:31:09] 3Phabricator: Searchable "Reference" custom field - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T991#991804 (10chasemp) seems not worth the headache at this point [22:32:03] 3Phabricator, operations: have any task put into ops-access-requests automatically generate an ops-access-review task - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87467#991967 (10chasemp) [22:50:08] 3Phabricator, operations: have any task put into ops-access-requests automatically generate an ops-access-review task - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87467#992004 (10RobH) [22:53:07] 3Phabricator, operations: have any task put into ops-access-requests automatically generate an ops-access-review task - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87467#992011 (10mmodell) I thought this was already done as part of the security extension. Not extensively tested though. [22:58:54] 3Phabricator, operations: have any task put into ops-access-requests automatically generate an ops-access-review task - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87467#992016 (10mmodell) The described behaviour is essentially how it works, however, it's not based on project tags, it's based on the security dropdown. It... [22:59:46] 3Phabricator, operations: have any task put into ops-access-requests automatically generate an ops-access-review task - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87467#992017 (10mmodell) Ah ha, I see the access request dropdown option is missing. @chasemp: any reason this isn't included in the config? [23:00:31] 3Phabricator, operations: have any task put into ops-access-requests automatically generate an ops-access-review task - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87467#992024 (10chasemp) @mmodell, before today we weren't ready for it, and I wasn't sure if the logic was ported to Security-Extension-2.0? [23:01:20] 3Phabricator, operations: have any task put into ops-access-requests automatically generate an ops-access-review task - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87467#992026 (10mmodell) @chasemp the logic is ported, just not very well tested. I'll do some testing on my local phab and we can go from there. [23:02:00] 3Phabricator, operations: have any task put into ops-access-requests automatically generate an ops-access-review task - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87467#992027 (10chasemp) >>! In T87467#992026, @mmodell wrote: > @chasemp the logic is ported, just not very well tested. I'll do some testing on my local pha... [23:37:54] 3Phabricator, operations: have any task put into ops-access-requests automatically generate an ops-access-review task - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87467#992259 (10mmodell) https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/186533/ [23:39:22] 3Phabricator: Add cscott to WMF_NDA. - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87479#992265 (10cscott) 3NEW [23:40:12] 3Phabricator, operations: have any task put into ops-access-requests automatically generate an ops-access-review task - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87467#992273 (10mmodell) @chasemp: See my patch, I fixed a couple of little things (fallout from upstream changes) and this seems to be working well now. [23:41:31] 3Phabricator, operations: have any task put into ops-access-requests automatically generate an ops-access-review task - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87467#992276 (10mmodell) One thing you might not want - it currently includes the "CC'd can see this" behaviour...