[00:04:37] * greg-g looks in [00:39:47] What's the status of the production instance? [00:39:59] Is it fully set up, being tested, or what? [00:42:00] It's being set up and will be available by the end of this week if all goes right. [00:44:07] andre__-afk, cool, I was just wondering since it's accessible but you can't log in with SUL yet. [00:44:12] I'm very excited about the work you're all doing. [00:44:16] yeah, not open yet [00:44:28] All fame goes to Chase and Mukunda. [00:47:48] speaking of which the legal stuff doesn't seem promising [01:48:56] :( :( [03:05:45] How about a horrible hack of adding js code that decorates the DOM to add a link to the stuff legal wants? [03:06:03] Not pretty or nice but maybe enough to make folks happy? [05:04:21] I don't see what the problem is, there are sevveral ways to do add a link... [05:19:50] bd808: i got the impression from the upstream ticket that there's easy options to add to e.g. header (ugh). but then probably whatever is added can be tweaked with CSS [05:20:15] OTOH, if legal's side is unclear or changing their mind or whatever then... [12:50:46] andre__, do you know when will chasemp be away? some days next week? [13:11:25] qgil: I assumed the entire week, but I see nothing in the WMF Sick/Vacation tracking calendar [13:30:16] andre__, ok, see my mail pls [13:30:24] reading right now [13:32:26] qgil: yeah, looks very good to me, thanks! (and definitely easier to go through tasks when we can all access the list of tasks again) [13:32:40] ok, sending. thanks [13:49:12] out all week, not sure what calendar you mean andre__ or I would add my time [13:49:46] chasemp: ah alright - Google Calendar has a shared "WMF Sick/Vacation tracking" calendar but not sure how common its use is in ops [13:52:01] qgil: question about the email, it says to postpone the meeting ot talk about 'the launch' but says to do so until after phab.wm.o [13:52:08] which launch then? [13:52:36] chasemp, "the launch" == after Bugzilla migration [13:54:49] I will be gone mon-fri, ship out sunday back late friday night [13:55:38] chasemp, ok, I think andre__ and me can represent well enough? [13:56:08] chasemp, your list of nonnegotiable blockers is welcome :) [13:56:13] I'm not really sure what the meeting is, invite said details coming [13:56:15] but they never came? [13:56:35] blockers for which thing? bugzilla? [13:57:36] Yes, blockers to go ahead with the last step: Bugzilla in read-only mode, start of migration, big announcement, phabricator.wikimedia.org for everybody [13:57:36] basically (as far as I understand) discussing which ones are not hard blockers, [13:57:46] e.g. fixing templates on-wiki etc [13:57:55] "defining the cut" I would call it [13:57:58] ok gotcha, so assuming production phab [13:58:00] but that's my understanding [13:58:06] tasks in bugzilla-migration hard nosed talk [13:58:58] ops agreed, assuming readiness, to migrate most of the rt queues at the end of sept [13:59:00] andre__, maybe it is a matter of langiuage, but negotiating non-blockers is easy, I'd rather get the list of blockers agreed :) [13:59:10] heh, yes! [13:59:18] with a datacenter closing out it is a hard time for doing it [14:00:16] One of the aspects of the meeting seems to be to define the GO based on requirements met, having some flexibility for date [14:00:18] * qgil starts a meeting right now. Will be back [14:05:55] anyway, if that meeting is about bugzilla only then it seems to not make sense before we have anything in prod at all [14:22:38] back [14:24:02] andre__, it would be great if you could send some kind of telegram with the status of the fab->phab migration after your weekly team meeting [14:24:27] qgil: generic short summary you mean? [14:24:29] andre__, in exchange of that, you don't really need to come up with firm dates as we had agreed before [14:24:32] haha [14:24:51] I see. Deal. (though I have to leave pretty soon after the meeting, but will do) [14:25:12] andre__, well yes, just to know how the migration is going and whether you have an idea about when will it be completed [14:25:18] sure [14:25:21] thanks [14:25:59] I can already state that the Legal requirement might still create some fun for us this week :-/ [14:26:07] you might want to discuss your view on the hard requirements that will define the GO for the final sprint: Bugzilla migration and official launch [14:26:27] this week? don't think so [14:26:34] anyway, you discuss :) [14:27:01] the meeting with Rob etc will be useful to define e.g. whether the legal requirement is a blocker or not [14:27:30] and if it is, how exactly can be satisfied in the short term [14:28:20] I would say: focus your time today in the questions you can answer (about your own work) instead of trying to guess others' questions/answers [14:54:14] andre__: ? [14:59:47] chasemp, yeah? [15:00:15] pm :) [15:43:19] twentyafterfour, around? [16:26:44] phabricator feature suggestion from someone I won't reveal [16:26:45] http://theonion.github.io/fartscroll.js/ [19:19:50] I talked to epriestley a bit [19:19:59] and linked him to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Privacy_Protection_Act [19:20:06] and long story short [19:20:12] I thnk we are getting an official footer ability [19:21:47] "I'll just implement something in the upstream, I wasn't aware of OPPA and that seems like something we should probably be complying with too. Let me finish up the thing I'm working on." [19:21:49] so ...hopefully [19:42:22] "The web site only has to be accessible by California residents." politicians are nuts [19:45:58] yep! [19:55:14] you know, to not over complicate things, right? [19:57:28] to me? [20:14:03] chasemp, if you want I can recreate the home as it was before [20:14:27] (trying to help, if this gives you more work because of account permission etc then no worries) :) [20:14:31] sounds good I just put enough up to be clear [20:17:23] chasemp, can I log in? (didn't try) [20:18:08] reg is disabled, maybe tomorrow we can sync up and get you through it? assumign you have an ldap account [20:18:30] I have one, and re tomorrow ok. [20:18:42] looking good so far! thank you chasemp [20:47:01] chasemp: I meant that's my sarcastic interpretation of what the politicans were thinking "If we just say you have to show it to CA residents, that's easier!" [21:44:33] chasemp: Heh. Thanks for making upstream comply to laws. :) [21:46:46] chasemp: and looks like you fixed the "Visible to" permissions already. Another Thanks. [22:30:07] this comment is so meta now https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T172#24