[00:03:10] New patchset: Zfilipin; "Removing example file, unnecessary" [qa/browsertests] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50457 [00:03:10] New patchset: Zfilipin; "Check for ULS language selector upon clicking language" [qa/browsertests] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50458 [00:05:15] New patchset: Zfilipin; "Cleanup: deleted unused code" [qa/browsertests] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50459 [00:06:14] New review: Cmcmahon; "deleting unused spike" [qa/browsertests] (master); V: 2 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50459 [00:06:32] New review: Demon; "Actually, I'm not sure this is necessary here at all. This isn't what we run on fenari, this is run ..." [mediawiki/tools/release] (master) C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50148 [00:06:41] New review: Cmcmahon; "delete unused spike" [qa/browsertests] (master); V: 2 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50457 [00:06:42] Change merged: Cmcmahon; [qa/browsertests] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50457 [00:07:17] New review: Cmcmahon; "first functional test for ULS itself" [qa/browsertests] (master); V: 2 C: 2; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50458 [00:07:17] Change merged: Cmcmahon; [qa/browsertests] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50458 [00:07:43] New review: Cmcmahon; "delete" [qa/browsertests] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50459 [00:07:43] Change merged: Cmcmahon; [qa/browsertests] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50459 [00:49:57] New review: Mattflaschen; "Demon, that makes sense. I thought this was used on fenari." [mediawiki/tools/release] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50148 [00:57:20] New review: Reedy; "You want to edit https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=operations/mediawiki-config.git;a=blob;f=mu..." [mediawiki/tools/release] (master) C: -1; - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50148 [00:57:57] New review: Reedy; "Screw you gerrit http://bit.ly/VC41cD" [mediawiki/tools/release] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50148 [01:02:34] Change abandoned: Reedy; "Replaced by https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50467" [mediawiki/tools/release] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50148 [01:05:12] New patchset: Cmcmahon; "INCOMPLETE test aiming to play Commons Media of the Day" [qa/browsertests] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50468 [07:30:42] Nikerabbit: question [07:31:28] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WfMsg#Deprecated_wfMsg.2A_functions [07:31:44] isn't there wfMsg( ) missing in the table [07:32:01] wfMsg( 'text' ) to be replaced by wfMessage( 'text' ) ??? [07:32:09] can anyone else help ? [07:34:33] Wikinaut: I think the alternative for wfMsg( 'foo' ) is wfMessage(' foo' )->text( [07:34:40] Ahm, ->text() of course [07:35:06] ah. I remember a recent chat [07:35:10] yes, and no [07:35:32] in simple cases, wfMessage( ) automagically detects what is to be returned [07:35:46] ty [07:35:58] I think it just defaults to ->text() or something [07:36:01] I forget which one [07:36:54] yes [07:37:00] I will also add a link to https://svn.wikimedia.org/doc/GlobalFunctions_8php.html#af747ea775a5144e1da9a130c22f02e6c [07:37:07] uh a hash [07:37:14] Also, be aware that ->escaped() exists and sometimes has to be used for security [07:37:20] Yeah Doxygen links are annoying like that [07:38:12] arragh, is there a way of having a deep link to https://svn.wikimedia.org/doc/GlobalFunctions_8php.html ---> wfMessage ? [07:38:50] RoanKattouw: "Also, be aware that ->escaped() exists and sometimes has to be used for security" [07:38:52] yes [07:39:04] I am on replacing E:OpenID wfMsg() constructs [07:39:16] using i18n texts [07:39:27] should'nt be a problem _there_ [07:40:11] except this must be "return wfMessage( 'text')->text() " (when returning a value) [07:41:12] Yes [07:41:19] Otherwise you'll end up returning a Message object [13:19:30] hello all [13:19:41] looking for assistance, I may be in wrong channel [13:20:51] I am trying to write a template for a wiki award that has the variable count= and then that will call the corresponding template [13:21:58] if the input is 3 it would call template:EWP3 which has the words A [13:22:09] 'A measily 3 edit reverts were exchanged [13:22:40] then if someone puts a 4 it would call the template:EWP4 etc. did i get the right channel? [22:18:52] nemo, i think i figured out where our disconnect is re: archiving. [22:29:47] jorm: oh, wonderful :) [22:30:00] * Nemo_bis is going to bed right after brushing teeth though [22:30:27] basically, i think we are talking about three things, separately. [22:30:44] I am using "archive" as a "process" term, not a "state" term. and "locked" as a state term. [22:30:54] and then i also include "stale", as a "state" term. [22:31:13] to me, "archived" means "scrolled off" and has nothing to do with the age of the thread. [22:31:28] but i think when you mean "archive", you mean what I call "stale" [22:31:40] e.g., no one has touched it in 2 weeks. it's stale. [22:31:54] bots move stale threads to subpages and call it "archiving" [22:32:40] yes, bots do that, but you can revert them [22:32:43] i would argue that a sane system would identify "stale" threads and warn about not editing them (but still allow it, because sometimes that's needed) and would auto-LOCK stale threads after additional time. [22:32:57] so, 2 weeks = stale; 60 days = autolocked. [22:33:05] right. and you an "unlock" threads. [22:33:09] 60 days is a very short time [22:33:16] a configurable number. [22:33:24] but does my thought come across? [22:33:25] I mainly use archived as resolved [22:33:47] yeah. i think of, say, threads that ahve been closed or hatted as "locked" [22:34:00] and that's what i'm going to be proposing. that if a thread is locked, yougive a summary as to why, and it's done. [22:34:07] New patchset: Platonides; "Take into account files which include another file that then dies." [mediawiki/tools/code-utils] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50589 [22:34:07] New patchset: Platonides; "Whitelist getcwd()" [mediawiki/tools/code-utils] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50590 [22:34:10] this can be "resolved", and i think that's actually a great verb. [22:34:18] heh [22:34:36] but the problem is how to show all and only unresolved threads on a pafe [22:34:39] *page [22:35:36] but now to bed [22:38:30] ah, that's a filter. [22:42:28] ... Is this about LQT? [22:43:14] no. [22:43:18] Flow. [22:43:22] ah. ok [22:43:32] but it references a problem in LQT.