[04:15:47] Change merged: Krinkle; [integration/doc] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/39085 [06:43:44] Anybody on? I have an APPARENT bug in undelete article with history. I requested some deleted articles be userfied. Then later, after editing a few of them, I requested that the edit histories be restored, because I had forgotten to ask for that previously, and I was curious about who had been writing the articles previously. Well, my edits were preserved, but all prior edits are listed as... [06:43:47] ...0-length, as is the article length at each edit. Here's the discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Foxj#Userfication_update.3F [06:44:09] Should I just file a bug? Or is this worth a look before I do that? [06:59:40] lexein: That's weird. You should file a bug [07:00:24] sounds like something fishy with the new content handler stuff. Note also the user:Nonexistent_user in the history [07:03:54] oh, the user's name literally is that [07:05:13] hmm, april 2006. maybe that's before rev_len was introduced. nonetheless if that's the case, it still needs to fail more gracefully then that [07:40:24] Ok, thanks, bug bein' filed. [07:40:32] (sry for lag) [07:43:11] This problem makes me fear for older articles, or old articles deleted a long time ago. [07:55:03] lexein: As far as I can tell, nothing is missing except for the rev_len field. All data is intact [07:55:56] Oh - silly me, I didn't check. I feared the worst. [07:56:11] lexein: just looked it up, rev_len was added in MediaWiki 1.10 [07:56:46] lol. [07:56:54] Y U NO POPULATE!? [07:58:58] hmm, I'm going to guess the article was deleted, and the maintenance script didn't look at the archive table [07:59:16] boooo [08:04:32] Bug filed, feel free to laugh at me https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43379 [08:05:13] bawolff: Right. [08:05:34] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24538 [08:05:39] Bug 24538 - populateRevisionLength.php doesn't check archive table [08:06:22] I commented. [08:07:07] ok, I think I'll just add a check to history page to not display size if it is not populated for that revision [08:07:37] What? [08:07:39] I wonder if it makes sense to mention this behavior upon restoral, in the wiki page for Admins intending to undelete articles - where's that? [08:07:50] You should just have ?action=history populate the fields. [08:07:59] Or fix the maintenance script. [08:08:32] * lexein is with Susan [08:08:43] Fix everything [08:08:43] * lexein on this [08:08:44] tbh [08:08:46] In the Biblical sense. [08:09:02] Reedy: Great idea! [08:09:07] biblical sense of what? [08:09:46] * lexein Mayan calendar vs. Biblical prophecy [08:10:33] * lexein thinks at least these two are constant disappointments [08:13:53] ori-l: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/in_the_biblical_sense [08:19:34] Susan: i know [09:50:59] AFAIK none of those populate scripts checks the archive. [09:51:08] woops [09:51:12] well that's a bad deal [09:51:24] actually I think the sha1 one might [09:51:32] It's not that frequent to undelete 2005 pages or so, though. [09:51:36] I vaguely remember someone griping about it [09:51:41] ah [21:58:33] plop