[00:09:10] Ryan_Lane: So we changed our minds, whenever you're able to deal with https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/24390 it would be very helpful [00:12:40] -_- [00:15:22] parsoid really needs its own channel? [00:36:24] Ryan_Lane: It's useful! We chat about boring parser things! [00:36:57] heh [00:37:18] this room never seems terribly active to me [00:37:51] there's been 8 non-bot messages in here all day [00:38:05] Ryan_Lane: And more as we chat! [00:38:16] I used it more when I wasn't in wm-staff [01:01:38] New patchset: Rfaulk; "Initialize a sub-folder for standalone scripts" [analytics/E3Analysis] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/24398 [01:01:38] New patchset: Rfaulk; "initialize a config sub folder for the project" [analytics/E3Analysis] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/24399 [01:01:38] New patchset: Rfaulk; "change committed: Initialize a sub-folder for standalone scripts" [analytics/E3Analysis] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/24400 [01:01:39] New patchset: Rfaulk; "R files containing helper methods for use on the interpreter command line and visualization methods" [analytics/E3Analysis] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/24401 [17:21:07] gah: Commons: "Error creating thumbnail: Invalid thumbnail parameters or PNG file with more than 12.5 million pixels", after successfully uploading a PNG [17:23:47] DarTar: where? [17:23:56] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Editor_Engagement_Metrics.png [17:24:18] first version was a 150dpi PNG [17:24:25] reduced to 72, upload went fine [17:29:46] yeah, that's kind of lame, maybe it could be an svg ;) [20:17:21] James_F: could you get the team members (or just 1) to cosign the rmoen request at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Gerrit_project_ownership ? [20:18:20] On it [20:24:19] James_F: RoanKattouw - done. [20:24:31] Yay [20:25:15] New patchset: Stefan.petrea; "filter works ok for *.planet.wikimedia.org , blog.wikimedia.org and wikimediafoundation.org Forked filter2.c from filter.c(only for first review and easy comparison between filter.c and filter2.c)" [analytics/webstatscollector] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/24487 [21:57:12] kaldari: marktraceur - I'm writing a GSoC wrapup post and wanted to give some vague estimate re the UploadWizard work being merged [21:57:30] "Integration of Flickr GSoC work (requires operational infrastructure change) [COMPLETE/BLOCKED]" [21:57:34] says [[Roadmap]] [21:57:50] kaldari: Didn't the core patch get....at least reviewed a few times? [21:58:51] Tim-away: ping [21:59:08] "Code was created for the two new features, and put into the two new Git branches flickr and geo. Both branches are awaiting merge into the main UploadWizard code." https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/status:open+project:mediawiki/extensions/UploadWizard+branch:master+topic:flickr,n,z and https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/status:open+project:mediawiki/extensions/UploadWizard+branch:master+topic:geo,n,z [21:59:12] says https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Summer_of_Code_Past_Projects [22:00:27] marktraceur: do you happen to know what the Ops change is that the UW change is blocked on? something having to do with the box that actually downloads Flickr images, right? [22:01:28] sumanah: Let me see if I can find it [22:36:51] Anyone know what it means when gerrit says: ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/drafts/master/privatedata (missing Change-Id in commit message) [22:38:56] Hmm... apparently had to set my own change id on it [22:40:57] csteipp, you probably didn't have the commit hook which adds change-ids [22:41:55] csteipp: When you get that error, generally a null amend (i.e. git commit --amend, save commit message without changing it) will trigger the hook and cause a change-id to appear [22:42:21] Cool. Thanks! [23:02:35] Has anyone written a stealth API extension that declines to document itself? For Account Creation UX experiment we want a validate API but don't want it to show up when you browse api.php [23:03:17] :/ spagewmf that seems wrong/weird to me.... I presume you have reasons though :) [23:04:22] sumanah, Tewwy said so, strongly. Don't want people confusing a short test with a new MW API. [23:05:47] spagewmf: Could you run it off-site somewhere? Separate server, separate service, etc.? [23:07:15] spagewmf: do you want people to not know about it at all? because that is just going to break, I know it [23:07:27] This is action=validateAccountCreation&wantedUsername=Jimbo , it's just going to see if the username is taken. [23:07:42] spagewmf: secret is just a headache.... some kind of decoy/blank thing might work? [23:08:01] spagewmf: Document it as "this is an experiment and WILL go away soon" [23:08:02] ? [23:09:25] sumanah It's not a security thing or secrecy thing (code on gerrit, public experiment, etc.), just "not part of API". RoanKattouw I guess so, api.php autodoc with TEMPORARY all over them [23:09:36] Yeah that would be reasonable IMO [23:11:34] I notice there's a way to invoke index.php?action=ajax&rs=E3Experiments::MyAPIFunction , adding it to $wgAjaxExportList. Does that pre-date the nifty self-documenting api.php? [23:12:32] RAAAARGH sajax DIE DIE DIE [23:13:40] Isn't sajax that guy on Wheel of Fortune? He's not that bad. [23:14:27] I <3 sajax [23:15:05] (mainly because many social tools use the AJAX endpoint to index.php as they predate the API, but the AJAX endpoint is pretty easy to use and all, IMHO) [23:27:53] * spagewmf sees 2010 threads about not-Pat Sajax. Hmm