[00:12:07] <Krinkle>	 sumanah: Ok, got it going
[00:12:14] <Krinkle>	 A little bit
[00:12:40] <Krinkle>	 (nothing public to show you, but the API is usable, just not documented, but pretty advanced and effecient)
[00:13:00] <sumanah>	 Krinkle: cool! right.
[00:13:08] <sumanah>	 (and subject to change, a lot) :(
[00:13:24] <Krinkle>	 sure, but that's doable, they'd have to update their front-end too
[00:14:35] <Krinkle>	 they're using jsonrpc as context type, similar to bugzilla
[00:14:55] <Krinkle>	 not as popular as straight json or jsonp, or 'restful'. but workable.
[00:15:09] <Krinkle>	 I'll try and hack something up tonight
[00:15:14] <Krinkle>	 Just proof of concept
[00:17:34] <sumanah>	 cool
[00:17:38] <sumanah>	 I appreciate it
[00:17:49] <sumanah>	 I think this'll help with a significant annoyance in Gerrit
[00:18:15] <sumanah>	 Roan said that changing "+2" and "+1" and "-1" and "-2" on the buttons was not possible really because of the way they deliver JS
[00:18:16] <Krinkle>	 well, before it can do what gerrit can do (not to mention to make it better) we'll be a few weeks/ month further
[00:18:21] <Krinkle>	 if we're doing it at all
[00:18:37] <Krinkle>	 changing it in gerrit itself is impossible indeed
[00:18:38] <sumanah>	 wait, Krinkle, what is it you got going?
[00:18:53] <sumanah>	 I thought we were just talking about a bookmarklet to transform Gerrit project names into gitweb URLs
[00:19:10] * sumanah  may have misunderstood

[00:19:11] <Krinkle>	 I'm gonna create a very ugly thing on toolserver tonight that'll probably only have 1 button (e.g "{show my projects}") and get it from gerrit
[00:19:24] <sumanah>	 oh!
[00:19:27] <sumanah>	 ok
[00:19:42] <Krinkle>	 and if that works, it's a proof of concept and we can decide wether or not to try this
[00:20:04] <Krinkle>	 but even if we do it'll still be a few months with gerrit's UI. and it's not all that bad, just counter intuitive and unexplained for what we are used to.
[00:20:11] <Krinkle>	 once known and documented, it's workable
[00:20:33] * sumanah  is dubious but will not interfere

[07:44:22] <Nemo_bis>	 Joan, have you had a look at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12262 ?
[07:44:59] <Nemo_bis>	 In particular, whether the patch still has the problems for which you reverted a similar change in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Common.css/Archive_6#dd_vs_notice_vs_dablink
[08:09:27] <Joan>	 Nemo_bis: I'd completely forgotten about that.
[08:09:31] <Joan>	 Back in my admin days...
[08:09:37] <Nemo_bis>	 heh
[08:09:50] <Joan>	 I vaguely remember the issue.
[08:10:26] <Nemo_bis>	 Wha amuses me is that 5 users on en.wiki can impose a style change on a very common item for all MediaWiki users.
[08:10:42] <Nemo_bis>	 But anyway, I don't know anything about CSS so I can't judge if it even works.
[10:55:41] <matanya>	 any staff here?
[18:13:29] <GerardM->	 Hoi, do we have a tool that can check if a webpage has changed in the last day ?
[18:13:33] <GerardM->	 and send a message when it has not ??
[18:21:25] <GerardM->	 the question has a  real world application ...