[13:19:36] hashar: Trying to find out why some URLs in code review e-mails are not https. [13:20:03] hashar: I'm seeing $url = $this->mRev->getCanonicalUrl( $commentId ); [13:20:04] (in ui/CodeRevisionCommitter.php) [13:24:17] siebrand: sorry connection is flappy [13:24:42] hashar: Is there a way to have CR always spit out https in e-mails/ [13:24:44] ? [13:25:06] if it use getCanonicalUrl, I guess that means it will always use http [13:25:45] hashar: okay, that explains what's going wrong, then. [13:25:50] we could force it to HTTPS but then people using only HTTP will scream [13:26:04] ideally we should have some kind of per user preference for HTTPS [13:26:07] hashar: you think there actually are devs that do? [13:26:23] send as a canonical (http) per default, but as a HTTPS one whenever a user opted in [13:26:32] I have no idea :/ [13:26:33] OR [13:26:40] we could just mod_rewrite http to https [13:26:43] if you force https then sometimes if https falls down then you have a really broken situation, IIRC [13:27:16] sumanah: well, me having to change from not logged in http to logged in https is also a really broken situation, isn't it? [13:27:34] sure. [13:27:45] I need to manually change the URL all the time; it's very annoying. [13:27:51] especially on tablets. [13:27:54] (or phone) [13:28:56] Oh well... [13:29:01] siebrand: talk about it on wikitech-l [13:29:09] cause we probably all have the same issue [13:29:09] I guess I'd just stop whining about dev things. [13:29:18] GIT will dove it all. [13:29:19] then we could just make that site https only [13:29:21] solve [13:29:31] or wait for gerrit yes :O) [13:29:35] at least, if you're using an OS that has apt-get [13:29:59] C:\mediawiki\extensions\CodeReview>apt-get [13:30:35] SM-LT6-2:Desktop siebrand$ apt-get [13:30:35] -bash: apt-get: command not found [14:06:30] cant we install git-review on windows platform ? [14:20:16] hey kids, what's still running 1.17? [14:20:33] I ask because on (random host) mw61 I see a bunch of these: [14:20:41] mw61 apache2[7296]: PHP Warning: filemtime() [function.filemtime]: stat failed for /usr/local/apache/common-local/php-1.17/extensions/WikiEditor/modules/./images/toc/close.png in /usr/local/apache/common-local/php-1.18/includes/resourceloader/ResourceLoaderFileModule.php on line 380 [14:20:57] I guess that RL needs some hardcoded stirng changed... [14:24:45] or some cached something cleared somewhere [14:25:09] apergos: I see the fundraising team back porting to 1.17. [14:25:24] apergos: possibly donate.wikimedia.org [14:25:50] apergos: nope. That says 1.18wmf1 (r109351) [14:25:51] really? meh but then we shouldn't be seeing tons of this sort of activity [14:25:55] yup [14:27:34] apergos: don't know where it runs, but this may help: https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Code/MediaWiki&path=%2Fbranches%2Ffundraising%2Fdeployment%2Fpayments_1.17 [14:27:59] well the log over these is *full* of those [14:28:04] errors. so I really doubt it's fr [14:28:15] as in hundreds of mb worth [17:28:36] @quit [17:55:02] Reedy: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/34728 [17:55:15] Reedy: last two comments [18:01:17] hexmode: Sam Reed, or Reedy, but not Sam Reedy :) [18:04:20] guillom: ugh [18:04:23] *hexmode sighs [18:04:32] sorry, reedy [18:05:09] I had typed "Reedy" but then said "I should call him by his name" and added "Sam" without removing the y [18:07:29] Reedy: are you around? [18:10:33] or AaronSchulz? [19:12:54] robla: lots of revs tagged 1.19 :( [19:13:03] *robla looks [19:13:10] *hexmode starts looking for people to review [19:14:18] robla: also see http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/119triage which has some new bugs [19:15:22] werdna: there is a 1.19 LQT bug if you get a chance [19:31:52] Krinkle: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/110988 -- does a string of @imports at the top work? [19:32:40] hexmode: technically yes, but in practice I'm not sure if it's good [19:32:49] it means re-ordering and thus affecting cascading [19:33:31] If we load module A, B and C, and C/style.css starts with @import foo.css, then the order should be A/style.css, B/style.css, C/foo.css, (rest of) C/style.css [19:33:32] Krinkle: ah, so how hard is the last bit of that fixme? [19:33:44] That is the case when creating 1 tags it encounters. And inside each of those tags it will only load the first 31 @import stylesheets. [19:52:43] So theoretically you could use 31 style tags with 31 @import each and load 961 stylesheets into Internet Explorer. But, for god???s sake, don???t do that!" [19:52:45] [19:52:55] bwahah [19:53:25] However implemented that must be laughing their ass off by now. [19:53:28] in IE [19:54:36] also, there's a short KB article on how the limits were caused (long url, short content) http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ieinternals/archive/2011/05/14/internet-explorer-stylesheet-rule-selector-import-sheet-limit-maximum.aspx [19:55:05] lunch? Oh right.. you're in SF [19:57:42] Krinkle: Actually it says @import nesting goes 4 levels deep [19:58:08] I'd best have a look at the merge queues [19:58:09] So in theory you could load 31^4 = 923,521 stylesheets :D [19:58:35] RoanKattouw_away: There's also the selector/rule limit per stylesheet [19:58:44] But I don't think we're hitting that yet [19:58:53] but we might when everything is squashed into 1