[15:47:18] *crazilon 	test
[17:59:03] <apergos>	who is the image upload guru these days?
[17:59:12] <apergos>	we're seeing some fun things in rc on commons:
[17:59:24] <apergos>	<rc type="log" ns="6" title="File:Tasha90.png" rcid="64033159" pageid="0" revid="0" old_revid="0" timestamp="2011-11-21T17:51:21Z" comment="" />
[17:59:33] <apergos>	like these, lots of 0s where there shouldn't be
[17:59:49] <apergos>	http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Tasha90.png&action=history      this otoh looks fine
[18:16:22] <Bryan>	apergos: that looks like ApiUpload doing magical stuff that it shouldn't be doing
[18:16:53] <Bryan>	check if they're uploaded with upload wizard; they'll contain a cat
[18:17:50] <apergos>	Uploaded with UploadWizard  that one was
[18:18:20] <Amgine>	UploadWizard was being bugchecked by brion last week.
[18:18:39] <brion>	mostly i just confirmed some bugs with the multi-upload
[18:19:00] <brion>	i did make a quick attempt to look at the internals when the bug with firefox 3.6 was reported, but quickly got lost
[18:19:08] <brion>	it's kinda scary code in places ;)
[18:19:30] <apergos>	well I can try looking at a chunk of these with rc_cur_id=0 and see if they are all from the upload wizard or not
[18:22:50] <apergos>	not all of them.   rc type="log" ns="6" title="File:Gunther Von-Bultzingslowen-met-het-.jpg" rcid="64034030" pageid="0" revid="0" old_revid="0" timestamp="2011-11-21T18:13:12Z" comment="{{Information...... <snipped by me>" logid="31812295" logtype="upload" logaction="upload">   but not upload wizard
[18:23:15] <apergos>	so.   I wonder what I file this against
[18:23:47] <brion>	what sorta bug is this?
[18:24:26] <apergos>	well some uploads are showing up with rc_cur_id = 0 and some aren't
[18:24:35] <apergos>	no apparent logic to it by inspecting rc
[18:26:07] <apergos>	in theory there ought to be a page_id at this point... ??
[18:26:44] <brion>	hmm funky
[18:26:45] <apergos>	http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Gunther_Von-Bultzingslowen-met-het-.jpg&action=history
[18:26:48] <apergos>	here they are.
[18:26:55] <apergos>	anyways there's rather a lot of them
[18:27:00] <brion>	might just be some awful caching race condition
[18:27:17] <apergos>	http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=recentchanges&rclimit=500&rcprop=comment|title|ids|timestamp|loginfo&rctype=log
[18:27:30] <apergos>	I am sure it is. both a race condition and something gawdawful to debug
[18:27:36] <brion>	yeah
[18:28:03] <apergos>	so...  (since I am not volunteering to debug it :-P)
[18:28:18] <brion>	probably some Title or Article instance isn't getting reset properly when the file: page gets created, or else the rc logging checks its existence via a lagged slave
[18:28:34] <brion>	if we can at least get that info in a bug that'll let us get to it later ;)
[18:28:50] <apergos>	that's what I plan to do
[18:28:55] <apergos>	I was wondering what to file it against
[18:29:10] <brion>	mediawiki / images or uploads
[18:29:18] <brion>	seems reasonable to me
[18:29:38] <apergos>	yeah I was just deciding that
[18:30:44] <apergos>	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25754
[18:30:53] <apergos>	so this says it's never filled but that's not true either :-D
[18:40:45] <apergos>	this is hurting my eyes but it might be the case that the ones with good info are all from the flickr upload bot
[18:45:42] <apergos>	yup, just cheked 5000 uploads/overwrites, of those, the ones with filled in pageids were all the flickr upload bot :-D
[18:52:48] <brion>	heh
[18:53:23] <Saibo>	hi guys. Could I get the topic? Sounds interesting
[19:00:50] <apergos>	hello, we were talking about recent changes records for uploaded images on commons
[19:04:11] <Saibo>	hm - okay. not that interesting. ;)  Thanks!
[19:24:29] <apergos>	heh oh well
[21:58:46] <Krinkle>	@replag
[21:58:49] <dbbot-wm>	Krinkle: No replag currently. See also "replag all".