[00:05:16] hehe [00:05:35] it's even better than i'm not on-call for either upgrade ;) [00:05:49] delegation ftw [00:22:51] here's this: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/NewPagePatrolZoomInterface [00:32:41] anybody could run a batch delete, pls? [00:33:32] yuvipanda: fyi, I am off work tomorrow & the next day, so I can't write the blog entry anyway, so please get it to me by Thurs? :D [00:34:04] Danny_B|backup, where? [00:34:23] /what [00:35:05] Reedy: actually, i've just realized, i should be able to use special:nuke. i always forget about we finally have it on projects ;-) [00:36:34] cool. it worked well. sorry for bothering [06:52:29] in http://svn.wikimedia.org/svnroot/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/MobileFrontend/MobileFrontend.php, line $linkTarget = wfMsgNoTrans( 'mobile-frontend-feedback-page' ); [06:52:47] I guess wfMsgForContent should be used here? [17:34:16] hello parutron [17:34:44] hi guillom [17:34:49] just finishing up a travel approval thingy [17:34:56] give me ONE minute [17:34:57] tops [17:35:13] sure :) [19:06:41] neilk_: I didn't want to keep bugging b rion over this, but I think I should clarify my previous suggestion. he identified some function calls that would almost certainly fail with the current code. he *could* write the tests now, but so could anyone [19:07:22] having some failing unit tests is still helpful [19:07:26] robla: if brion is fixing it, brion is fixing it [19:07:38] robla: there's not much use inserting ourselves in the process [19:07:46] yeah i'm poking at it [19:08:04] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/92246 for instance seems to have changed the tests in a confusing way [19:08:07] that i might need to undo :) [19:08:11] I'm fixing a related issue for UploadWizard [19:08:38] alright....I'll lay off then [19:23:21] @info s3 [19:23:21] Krinkle: [s3 (DEFAULT)] db39: 10.0.6.49, db34: 10.0.6.44, db25: 10.0.6.35 [19:40:29] Part of me thinks we should just upgrade mw.org and get on with it [20:58:22] RoanKattouw: does resource loader require jquery? [20:58:48] Yes [20:59:14] RoanKattouw: okay, thanks [21:44:19] jorm: The keyword filter in the feedback design thingy basically means searching for any word that might appear in the comment, right? [21:44:56] If so, that might hurt a little bit [21:49:48] jorm: Also, do we want to filter by page or have some other UI (like a page-specific dashboard) that displays comments for a certain page? Andrew put in an index to cover that use case [21:51:28] we don't have a use case for that yet (but we will in the future) [21:51:41] filter by keyword - ideally we'd create an index of the most common used words and then search on that. [21:51:44] Right [21:51:49] About the unanswered filter [21:51:55] Is there currently a way to reply to comments? [21:53:05] Cause if replying to comments isn't added until phase 2, then in phase 1 there is no such thing as an unanswered comment, right? [21:53:13] jorm: ---^^ [21:53:27] There should nto be an unanswered filter in the first iteration. [21:53:33] since there isn't a way to respond yet. [21:53:39] Right, KO [21:53:40] *OK [21:53:46] sorry; i think that's missing from the screenshot for phase 1. [21:53:49] I'll tell Trevor too, since it's a UI element [21:53:58] Well, it's the opposite of missing, really :) [21:54:03] It /should/ be missing but isn't [21:56:16] jorm: Oh, wait, https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/File:Feedback-Dashboard-Phase1-ReadOnly.png looks good. Never mind [22:04:44] yeah, there's a distinct phase 1 and phase 2 screnshot. [22:04:53] Yeah I missed that [22:04:57] Trevor noticed, though [22:07:14] jorm: Can we drop the single conversation view in phase1 or not? It's not too useful because every conversation contains 1 message, but you I do see the need to permalink to a message even without replies [22:08:06] (Hmm, I also notice there's no screenshot for the view-a-single-convo page at all) [22:10:19] jorm: Hmm it looks like indexing may require some effort. Are you cool with pushing that to phase 2? [22:19:11] if it's a problem, sure. [22:19:18] it's mostly of value when people start responding, anyway. [22:20:03] "Single Conversation View" is just permalinking to the specific feed comment. [22:20:51] Yeah [22:20:58] I guess I can use the same UI and just display one comment [22:21:07] As if there's a filter that only matched that [22:21:11] And hide the filter elements [22:21:37] right. [22:24:57] Why am I retagging revisions that were merged into a branches history before it was created [22:24:59] bahh [22:25:19] haha