[20:30:10] <robla>	hexmode: is there a bug triage happening at in 30 min?
[20:42:59] <hexmode>	robla: no....  I should've announced, that, though.
[20:43:40] <robla>	k....also, should probably delete the invite in calendar.
[20:43:58] <hexmode>	will do
[20:44:27] <hexmode>	I'm going to be cleaning up the stuff I said I would do on the 1st of August
[20:45:54] <hexmode>	robla: maintainer of proofread extension (which is basically core to WikiSource) has said he doesn't have time to maintain it
[20:46:10] <hexmode>	I'm putting out a call for devs on wikitech-l
[20:46:15] <robla>	k
[20:46:19] <hexmode>	anything else I should do?
[20:46:50] <robla>	what's the state of 1.18 blockers?
[20:47:02] <hexmode>	1s
[20:47:27] <hexmode>	first: something to be aware of https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29246&list_id=20333
[20:48:00] <hexmode>	since the image thumbnail problem is apparently gone according to reports from #wikimedia-commons
[20:48:53] <hexmode>	blockers: 3 left for deployment
[20:49:28] <hexmode>	I think one of them, thumbnails, is fixed.
[20:49:44] <Bryan>	evening
[20:49:56] <Bryan>	is there triage tonight?
[20:50:20] <hexmode>	Bryan: no
[20:50:45] <hexmode>	Bryan: but, do you have any interest in mobile or revdel?
[20:51:03] *hexmode 	tries to lure a developer
[20:51:08] <Bryan>	in neither
[20:51:28] <Bryan>	but I don't have time for things that require commitment anyway
[20:51:31] <hexmode>	:P
[20:51:37] <hexmode>	sure... k
[20:54:59] <hexmode>	robla: Bryan: ^demon: Nikerabbit: werdna: TimStarling: got time to go over 1.18 tarball blockers?
[20:55:23] <hexmode>	since robla reminded me of them  :P
[20:55:37] <robla>	tarball blockers?
[20:55:43] <hexmode>	y
[20:55:50] <robla>	not deploy blockers?
[20:55:52] <hexmode>	we did the deployment ones
[20:56:02] <hexmode>	I'm just looking at these tarball ones
[20:56:14] <hexmode>	and thinking maybe some shouldn't be there
[20:56:26] <robla>	when was the deploy blocker review?
[20:56:44] <hexmode>	3-4 weeks ago?  I'd have to look.
[20:56:49] <robla>	ummmmm
[20:58:33] <hexmode>	there are only 3 blocking right now, and I think they should be...
[20:58:39] <hexmode>	others are fixed.
[20:58:49] <hexmode>	and of the 3, I think one is fixed
[20:59:33] <robla>	let's talk about the individual issues
[21:00:03] <hexmode>	robla: http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/BugTriage-2011-06 has the deployment triage
[21:00:20] <hexmode>	robla: for deployment or tarball?
[21:00:33] <hexmode>	or both?
[21:00:34] <robla>	deployment please
[21:00:35] <hexmode>	:)
[21:00:57] <hexmode>	bug: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29068
[21:01:14] <hexmode>	28613 is the thumbnail problem
[21:01:23] <hexmode>	which I *think* is resolved
[21:01:55] <hexmode>	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29170  - "[[MediaWiki:Enotif body]] needs GENDER support"
[21:02:20] <hexmode>	I'll talk to Nikerabbit about that one.
[21:03:09] <hexmode>	the other: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21279 -- "Regular deletion of revisions deleted with rev_deleted breaks links in log entries"
[21:03:22] <hexmode>	I think I need to talk to brion on that one
[21:03:33] <robla>	I doubt Brion is the right assignee for that one
[21:03:43] <hexmode>	who should be?
[21:03:51] <hexmode>	I don't know anything about revdel, really
[21:04:29] <robla>	AaronSchulz may be a good choice.  I just asked him to join us
[21:04:57] <hexmode>	k
[21:05:37] <hexmode>	robla: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28613#c69 comment may be something to look at if the thumbnail problem comes back
[21:05:58] <hexmode>	but it mentions https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30192
[21:06:13] <hexmode>	which I don't think should be a blocker
[21:06:23] <hexmode>	but let me ask in -commons
[21:07:28] *hexmode 	asks
[21:08:20] <hexmode>	saibo, who updated the thumbnail bug for me last night is looking at it right now
[21:08:25] <robla>	AaronSchulz: we were discussing bug 21279
[21:08:30] <robla>	!b 21279
[21:08:30] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21279
[21:08:54] <^demon>	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29170 shouldn't be a blocker IMO.
[21:09:42] <AaronSchulz>	so...what's needed for 21279? a change to deletedcontribs?
[21:09:50] <^demon>	That whole enotif thing needs refactoring anyway
[21:09:55] <hexmode>	^demon: k.  I'll remove it if Nikerabbit agrees and thinks it would take too long
[21:10:06] <hexmode>	^demon: file a bug!
[21:10:18] <^demon>	There is a bug
[21:10:22] <^demon>	And it's marked as a dependency
[21:10:31] <hexmode>	:P
[21:10:41] <^demon>	22769 is the blocker to it.
[21:10:48] <^demon>	Which I fixed years ago, but Brion reverted me
[21:12:29] <Reedy>	^demon, revert brion, it's not 3RR yet
[21:12:41] <hexmode>	:)
[21:13:10] <robla>	so...which one are we discussing here?
[21:13:30] <robla>	hexmode: ^
[21:14:03] <hexmode>	robla: ^demon was talking about the enotify one
[21:14:39] <AaronSchulz>	I don't even know what's needed for bug 21279
[21:15:01] <hexmode>	AaronSchulz: could you look? do you know who could look?
[21:15:29] <robla>	AaronSchulz: perhaps what we should do is for you and Brion to talk about 21279 when he's back from Haifa, and figure out who is going to take it
[21:16:54] <hexmode>	sounds good to me
[21:17:16] <hexmode>	and I think ^demon should revert brion :)
[21:17:26] <robla>	for the Enotif bug, that one is only a blocker if Nikerabbit agrees, right?
[21:17:38] <hexmode>	Yeah, I think so
[21:17:51] <hexmode>	but if he says no, then it isn't
[21:17:56] <^demon>	brion only reverted me because I didn't retain back-compat.
[21:18:14] <hexmode>	and I wish if we said Nikerabbit's nick often enough he would show up :)
[21:18:20] <sputnick>	hi
[21:18:43] <hexmode>	sputnick: hey
[21:19:16] <sputnick>	is there a good place to ask for dev extensions questions ?
[21:19:19] <robla>	hexmode: you  believe bug 28613 is fixed?
[21:19:23] <sputnick>	*is it*
[21:19:32] <robla>	sputnick: #mediawiki is better
[21:19:36] <hexmode>	sputnick: #mediawiki would be better
[21:19:37] <hexmode>	:)
[21:19:40] <sputnick>	ok
[21:20:07] <hexmode>	robla: after talking to apergos and saibo in commons, yes
[21:20:29] <robla>	excellent.  please mark it resolved then
[21:21:00] <hexmode>	k... was leaving it open to get more feedback but closing it works for that, too.
[21:21:07] <hexmode>	:)
[21:21:08] <robla>	hexmode: for the other two issues, can you write comments reflecting the result of this converation?
[21:21:22] <hexmode>	yep
[21:21:47] <hexmode>	do you have time to talk about tarball blockers?
[21:24:19] <robla>	a little bit
[21:24:23] <hexmode>	:)
[21:24:57] <hexmode>	tarball list: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28425
[21:25:38] <AaronSchulz>	ok, show/hide in hist is totally broken
[21:25:39] <robla>	k
[21:25:55] <AaronSchulz>	You have either not specified a target revision(s) to perform this function, the specified revision does not exist, or you are attempting to hide the current revision.
[21:26:01] <AaronSchulz>	wtf
[21:26:22] <hexmode>	ugh
[21:26:34] <hexmode>	so that def seems like a blocker, no?
[21:26:44] <hexmode>	robla: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15472: Feed diff-content should be hidden for users without the "read" user right
[21:28:06] <hexmode>	seems like that one is going to rot, shouldn't block till it is fixed
[21:28:28] <robla>	that's marked as low priority.  I'm betting it's only a blocker because it used to be "highest" for some weird reason
[21:28:59] <hexmode>	25985 - When $wgSpamRegex is triggered be sure to return to editing and not throw the users work away
[21:29:25] <hexmode>	not sure it is a regression
[21:29:32] <hexmode>	!b 25985
[21:29:32] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25985
[21:30:54] <robla>	not a blocker
[21:31:10] <hexmode>	27132 - Uncomment movefile right in default settings
[21:31:17] <hexmode>	!b 27132
[21:31:17] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27132
[21:31:34] <hexmode>	ugh
[21:31:37] <hexmode>	not a blocker
[21:31:47] <Reedy>	That's also stupidly easy
[21:31:51] <Reedy>	It's more a case of when, than if
[21:32:03] <hexmode>	unless Bryan hasa time
[21:32:10] <hexmode>	which he doesn't
[21:32:45] <Bryan>	but you do have my blessings
[21:33:07] <robla>	how long ago was it commented out?
[21:33:13] <Reedy>	When it was added, probably
[21:33:21] <robla>	running on the cluster?
[21:33:32] <Reedy>	for sysops on commons etc
[21:33:34] <^demon>	For sysops only, iirc.
[21:33:39] <Myra>	Which is patently stupid.
[21:33:40] <hexmode>	Bryan: blessing to uncomment?
[21:33:40] <Reedy>	It seems to be "stable" enough
[21:33:44] <Myra>	But that's a separate isue.
[21:33:45] <Myra>	issue
[21:33:46] <Bryan>	yeah
[21:34:13] <Myra>	It was enabled by Brion for admins only, if that gives you an idea of when it was.
[21:34:29] <Bryan>	it was originally not very stable, so we limited it to sysops because we thought that they would be better able to report problems
[21:34:42] <robla>	might as well make the stupidly simple change so that we don't have to discuss it again
[21:34:45] <Myra>	Now an entire bureaucracy has built up around the user right.
[21:34:53] <Myra>	Separate user groups, etc.
[21:35:03] <Myra>	Because moving a file is vastly different than moving a wiki page...
[21:35:31] <hexmode>	robla++
[21:35:38] <hexmode>	28083 - Load MediaWiki:Filepage.css only when it exists
[21:35:44] <hexmode>	!b 28083
[21:35:44] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28083
[21:35:56] <robla>	though I just realized the bureaucracy will probably mobilize if we change it at this point, so it's probably not going to save us time, but whatevs
[21:36:17] <Reedy>	Just override it in CommonSettings.php
[21:36:26] <Reedy>	Easily sorted for WMF till we get lolconensus
[21:36:36] <^demon>	s/lol/local/ ?
[21:36:48] <robla>	^demon: he probably meant lol
[21:36:51] <Reedy>	No, I meant lol
[21:37:53] <hexmode>	any thoughts on 28083?
[21:39:18] <hexmode>	should it block 1.18, that is?
[21:40:00] <Myra>	I don't think so.
[21:40:11] <Reedy>	Ditto
[21:40:27] <Myra>	It should be fixed, though.
[21:40:40] <Reedy>	Myra, bugs have a habit of being like that
[21:40:55] <hexmode>	lolconsensus reached
[21:40:58] <hexmode>	28863 - Remove references to code deprecated before 1.17 in 1.18
[21:41:05] <hexmode>	seems like it should be
[21:41:11] <hexmode>	!b 28863
[21:41:11] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28863
[21:41:13] <Bryan>	wontfix
[21:41:35] <Reedy>	It's not a blocker, but I'm not quite sure it's a wontfix etiher
[21:41:52] <Reedy>	later maybe
[21:41:59] <^demon>	It's a "as we get to it."
[21:42:01] <hexmode>	k
[21:42:03] <^demon>	There's no rush.
[21:42:07] <hexmode>	29102 - Upgrade fails "Unknown character set: 'mysql4"
[21:42:17] <hexmode>	!b 29102
[21:42:17] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29102
[21:42:22] <^demon>	I thought we discussed that one weeks ago.
[21:42:27] <hexmode>	only on upgrading old bugs
[21:42:29] <^demon>	Yes it's a bug, but somewhat of an edge case.
[21:42:33] <robla>	 hexmode: please mark 28863 as normal (or low) priority
[21:42:40] <hexmode>	will do
[21:42:45] <hexmode>	when done here
[21:43:11] <hexmode>	^demon: right we talked about it and right, not a blocker
[21:43:48] <robla>	workaround is to upgrade to 1.16 + MySQL5 first?
[21:43:49] <hexmode>	29232 - Let Http / MWHttpRequest handle redirects safely on any CURL version
[21:43:53] <hexmode>	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29232
[21:43:59] <hexmode>	robla: yeah, think so
[21:44:41] <Bryan>	should really be fixed, but won't hurt to stay unfixed for another release
[21:44:50] <hexmode>	I think I could fix 29232, but, then, I'm not sure how much we care about older curl versions like brion mentioned
[21:45:24] <Reedy>	How much older?
[21:45:39] <Bryan>	2009
[21:45:49] <Bryan>	quite recent imho
[21:45:50] <Reedy>	Can we use a sane levelling point like our min php version?
[21:45:59] <hexmode>	2 years is ancient history
[21:46:07] <hexmode>	Reedy: agreed
[21:46:23] <AaronSchulz>	http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/phase3/includes/Wiki.php?r1=91941&r2=91942&
[21:46:26] <Reedy>	ie is it fixed in curl from the time when 5.2.3 (?) was being pushed out
[21:46:28] <AaronSchulz>	I think that totally broke revdelete
[21:46:32] <hexmode>	anyone want to check that right off?
[21:46:43] <AaronSchulz>	at least from history buttons
[21:46:52] <hexmode>	AaronSchulz: can you fix it, then?
[21:47:02] *hexmode 	is glad AaronSchulz found it
[21:47:50] <hexmode>	29246 - API errors occasionally with unknown error 231
[21:47:56] <hexmode>	!b 29246
[21:47:56] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29246
[21:48:02] <hexmode>	related one today
[21:48:07] <hexmode>	let me get the num
[21:48:24] <AaronSchulz>	what was the branch point?
[21:48:30] <Bryan>	!1.18
[21:48:30] --elephant--	I don't know anything about "1.18".
[21:48:39] <Bryan>	!branchpoints
[21:48:39] --elephant--	I don't know anything about "branchpoints".
[21:48:39] <hexmode>	!b 30201
[21:48:39] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30201
[21:48:41] <Bryan>	!branchpoint
[21:48:41] --elephant--	I don't know anything about "branchpoint".
[21:48:45] <AaronSchulz>	heh
[21:48:55] *Bryan 	kicks elephant2
[21:49:02] <Bryan>	anyway
[21:49:10] <Bryan>	i'll leave it at this for today
[21:49:10] <hexmode>	related in that it was api and errors
[21:49:12] <Bryan>	good night
[21:49:18] <hexmode>	Bryan: tyvm
[21:49:47] <Myra>	I've been getting a lot of HTTP 504 errors with the API.
[21:49:48] <robla>	Reedy: can you tackle 29246?
[21:49:53] <Bryan>	hexmode: might be a dupe of 30086 btw
[21:49:58] <hexmode>	Myra: recently?
[21:50:02] <Bryan>	sounds like an ops problem
[21:50:05] <Bryan>	anyway
[21:50:07] <Bryan>	night
[21:50:13] <robla>	night!
[21:50:17] <Myra>	Yeah, I doubt it's a MW problem.
[21:50:21] <Myra>	hexmode: Yes, recently.
[21:50:32] <Myra>	I get e-mails from cron.
[21:51:02] <hexmode>	Myra: any chance you could find when the first one showed up?
[21:51:19] <AaronSchulz>	robla: what's the branch point?
[21:51:47] <hexmode>	AaronSchulz:     http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/92475
[21:52:06] <AaronSchulz>	sigh
[21:52:29] <robla>	sigh?
[21:52:44] <Myra>	hexmode: Looks like I've been getting them since sometime in 2010?
[21:52:51] <hexmode>	:P
[21:52:59] <Myra>	Earliest e-mail I have is March 2010.
[21:53:13] <hexmode>	ok, so not a *recent* issue
[21:53:18] <hexmode>	at least yours isn't
[21:53:29] <hexmode>	maybe it is happening even more often now
[21:53:31] <Myra>	It's hard to say whehther they've picked up in frequency lately.
[21:53:43] <Myra>	I dunno. It's been going on for a while now. I've mostly been ignoring it.
[21:53:49] <Myra>	It'd be great if it stopped happening, though!
[21:53:50] <robla>	I'm guessing that people at Wikimania are learning about all sorts of cool new toys, so I wouldn't be surprised if it's getting hit a little harder
[21:54:10] <robla>	(new to them, at least)
[21:54:12] <AaronSchulz>	I may just need to revert some crap
[21:54:21] <AaronSchulz>	http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/91949
[21:54:22] <hexmode>	robla: so today that might be an issue
[21:54:40] <hexmode>	but 30083 was last month
[21:55:19] <hexmode>	^demon: 29246 you have time for that?
[21:55:23] <robla>	!b 30083
[21:55:23] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30083
[21:55:26] <hexmode>	er
[21:55:36] <hexmode>	roan, not ^demon
[21:55:44] <^demon>	I was going to say...
[21:55:44] <hexmode>	or maybe reedy
[21:55:46] <^demon>	Ermmm, API?
[21:55:47] <^demon>	:p
[21:55:58] <Reedy>	If the 504 errors are increasing in frequency.. it's something we need to find out where shizz is breaking
[21:56:15] <robla>	oh....the new uploader hits the api a lot harder, I imagine
[21:56:31] <MarcoAurelio>	Hello. Does !b 26170 belong to the component/extension indicated? - I'm modifying it and in passing I could correct that.
[21:56:41] <MarcoAurelio>	!b 26170
[21:56:41] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26170
[21:56:53] <^demon>	MarcoAurelio: Yes, it's correct.
[21:56:59] <MarcoAurelio>	ktnx
[21:57:05] <hexmode>	!b 30086
[21:57:05] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30086
[21:57:10] <AaronSchulz>	why toes tsvn reverse merge do nothing?
[21:57:19] <hexmode>	that one, robla, not *83
[21:58:44] <AaronSchulz>	oh, nv
[21:59:08] <hexmode>	 29408 - Upload fails and unable to move existing .edm files without extension: "Key 'something.' is not in a proper format"
[21:59:13] <hexmode>	!b 29408
[21:59:13] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29408
[21:59:14] <AaronSchulz>	yay, conflict
[21:59:37] <robla>	hexmode: what did you decide on 30086?
[21:59:45] <Reedy>	Can someone assign me the the api 504/whatever bugs, and i'll have a look tomorrow
[22:00:18] <hexmode>	Reedy: sure thing
[22:00:29] <Reedy>	is there 2 bugs for api related errors?
[22:00:37] <Reedy>	ie the more constant ones
[22:01:00] <hexmode>	"more constant"?
[22:01:08] <Reedy>	happening more often
[22:01:22] <hexmode>	you mean not the intermittant one w/ json reports?
[22:01:34] <hexmode>	I think there may be
[22:02:27] <hexmode>	if so, I'll give 'em both to you , Reedy
[22:02:51] <Reedy>	Yeah, if they're more site/ops esk issues, they are probably a bit more high priority
[22:03:01] <hexmode>	Reedy: is 30086 api stuff?
[22:03:23] <Reedy>	It's possible it is, yeah
[22:03:27] <hexmode>	or just upload/infrastructure?
[22:03:52] <Reedy>	It could be both
[22:04:26] <hexmode>	robla: I decided to let Reedy take point... I was just pointing it out b/c someone mentioned it as an api error
[22:04:43] <Reedy>	it wouldn't harm to see if there are any useful errors about
[22:04:59] <hexmode>	I can ask on -commons
[22:05:09] <hexmode>	they're my new buddies :)
[22:05:38] <robla>	hexmode: it would probably be a good idea to make neilk_ aware of the upload errors, even if Reedy is the one investigating
[22:05:58] <hexmode>	yes, I think he reads all the bugs though
[22:06:05] *hexmode 	makes sure component is right
[22:06:17] <Reedy>	i did log a bug saying uploadwizard was slow, so he should be in the loop
[22:06:28] <Reedy>	cc him on the 30086 probably anyway
[22:06:36] <hexmode>	:(
[22:06:44] <hexmode>	not right component
[22:07:17] <hexmode>	whwat sort of errors should I ask about in -commons?
[22:07:36] <hexmode>	just any errors?
[22:09:48] <neilk_>	robla, hexmode -- I'm aware that people are complaining a lot :)
[22:10:11] <hexmode>	:)
[22:11:01] <hexmode>	ready for the next one...
[22:11:08] <hexmode>	only a couple more
[22:11:13] <hexmode>	29408 - Upload fails and unable to move existing .edm files without extension: "Key 'something.' is not in a proper format"
[22:11:18] <hexmode>	!b 29408
[22:11:18] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29408
[22:12:23] <hexmode>	last comment on bug: "Attempting to move already-uploaded .dem files, without changing the .dem extension, causes the error "The new file extension does not match its type" to appear (and the file doesn't move)."
[22:13:50] <hexmode>	seems like it shouldn't block tarball if the other part is already solved
[22:14:17] <robla>	yup
[22:14:58] <robla>	well...hm
[22:15:54] <robla>	yeah, not a blocker
[22:15:55] <hexmode>	hm?
[22:16:01] <hexmode>	k :)
[22:16:07] <hexmode>	29847 - Regression: &action=unwatch is broken with JS off
[22:16:13] <hexmode>	!b 29847
[22:16:13] --elephant--	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29847
[22:17:36] <hexmode>	seems like it is only an issue if enotifwatchlist is on
[22:18:49] <hexmode>	robla: ^demon: any opinion if that should block tarball?
[22:19:19] <^demon>	If it's actually a regression and we can repro it.
[22:19:44] <robla>	AaronSchulz: were you able to repro 29847?
[22:20:19] <AaronSchulz>	not with the watch/unwatch star
[22:20:30] <AaronSchulz>	the only link I can think of that would break was in emails
[22:20:37] <AaronSchulz>	but I changed the code to show a form in that case
[22:20:42] <hexmode>	:)
[22:20:44] <AaronSchulz>	(the case of no valid token)
[22:20:50] <robla>	by my reading, both Aaron and Brion tried it, so hexmode, you may want to take a run at it before marking "worksforme"
[22:20:51] <hexmode>	ok, so it is fixed?
[22:21:23] <hexmode>	I'll verify the emailed link works, right?
[22:21:52] <AaronSchulz>	r92012
[22:21:56] <AaronSchulz>	it should be fine now
[22:22:09] <robla>	!r 92012
[22:22:09] --elephant--	http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/92012
[22:22:38] <hexmode>	oh! and pre-branch!
[22:22:42] <hexmode>	:)
[22:23:12] <hexmode>	btw, while we were doing this
[22:23:35] <hexmode>	Saibo verified that we never delete thumbnails on commons: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30192
[22:24:16] <hexmode>	robla: that's a minor privacy/copyright concern -- you have to know the url of the old thumbnail
[22:24:27] <hexmode>	robla: should it block deploy?
[22:26:36] <robla>	yeah, let's put it there
[22:27:44] <hexmode>	k
[22:28:00] <hexmode>	I'll make these updates later
[22:28:07] *hexmode 	saves the log
[22:28:13] <hexmode>	tyvm everyone
[22:30:31] <Withoutaname>	$wgRemoveGroups['bureaucrat'] = array( 'bot', 'accountcreator', 'ipblock-exempt', 'reviewer', 'sysop')  for enwiki
[22:55:59] <^demon>	robla: Are we having our team meeting with people in Haifa?
[22:56:38] <robla>	hi....I'd moved that meeting earlier this afternoon (sorry for waiting until last minute).
[22:56:58] <robla>	^demon: I'm guessing you haven't synced your tablet this afternoon  :)
[22:57:16] <^demon>	Phone still buzzed me just now.
[22:57:28] <^demon>	Switching timezones seems to have confused the heck out of my calendar.
[22:57:46] <robla>	I postponed until Thursday of next week
[22:57:51] <^demon>	Gotcha.
[23:00:04] <robla>	oh.....there's a duplicate left over from the GCal migration
[23:00:06] <robla>	drat