[02:07:03] <robla>	hexmode: I think I'd like to start futzing with priorities on the post-deploy bugs: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=27339&hide_resolved=1  ...just wanted to give you a heads up in case you were online now
[02:47:10] <hexmode>	robla: ok, I didn't see this, but ok.
[03:18:31] <robla>	I ended up getting distracted and not doing it yet
[03:55:29] <hexmode>	heh
[03:58:31] <robla>	hexmode: does https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27484 look like a high priority item to you?
[04:00:01] <robla>	I'm being a little more conservative myself in marking it, given that Alolita and Neil seem to be on top of priority setting, but looking at the list of bugs, it looks like one of the more important ones to get fixed
[04:01:28] <hexmode>	btw, not on my main computer so not seeing the pings
[04:01:55] <robla>	no worries...it's not work time anyway  :)
[04:01:56] <hexmode>	but I have a meeting set up wit Alolita Tuesday
[04:02:17] <hexmode>	checking list
[04:02:57] <robla>	I created a new query: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=1.17%20deployment%20cleanup%20issues ...this gives us the 27339 blockers in a list we can sort
[04:03:34] <hexmode>	robla: was thinking of another email to wikitech-l asking people to look at the 1.17 post-deploy and 1.17 bugs
[04:04:03] <robla>	hexmode: good idea.  I've got some suggestions on how to frame it
[04:04:09] <hexmode>	thinking tonight would be a good time to send it in case anyone  is looking for some useful hacking to do on the weekend
[04:04:17] <robla>	wonderful
[04:04:18] <hexmode>	excellent
[04:04:30] <hexmode>	suggestions?
[04:05:10] <robla>	yeah...I think sort of a "triage via email" might be the way to frame it
[04:05:48] <robla>	in addition to soliciting help fixing the issues, maybe soliciting opinions on the priority of the list items
[04:07:38] <hexmode>	lemme see if I can come up with something... you around for a while?
[04:07:41] <hexmode>	hrm
[04:07:44] <hexmode>	it is late
[04:08:01] <robla>	not as late here as it is there  :)
[04:08:54] <robla>	are you still up for doing it tonight?  "no" is totally alright...just want to help you out if you're still eager to do it
[04:09:22] <hexmode>	btw clicking that link I get such saved search
[04:09:39] <hexmode>	I think so, lemme blast something out
[04:11:04] <robla>	hexmode: you're saying you get the search, or you don't get the search?  (did you mean "no such saved search")?
[04:11:21] <hexmode>	#27484 is important.  I even confirmed with Neil that it affects deployment
[04:11:29] <hexmode>	and its IE ... so...
[04:11:44] <hexmode>	"no such saved search"
[04:13:58] <hexmode>	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=27339&hide_resolved=1 works
[04:14:11] <robla>	hexmode: give it another shot
[04:14:23] <robla>	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=1.17%20deployment%20cleanup%20issues
[04:14:39] <hexmode>	:(
[04:15:21] <robla>	hexmode: does it show up here? https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=saved-searches
[04:16:21] <hexmode>	oh, yeah
[04:16:23] <hexmode>	1s
[04:17:11] <hexmode>	working on the email now :)
[04:19:19] <robla>	I think the top 5 or so bugs by priority on the list of 27339 blockers should probably get a daily ping
[04:19:35] <hexmode>	Makes sense
[04:20:37] <robla>	(weekday ping...no sense nagging people over the weekend unless things are really busted)
[04:20:48] <hexmode>	awww...
[04:21:42] <hexmode>	just to verify, those are all shown as 27339 blockers?
[04:22:46] <robla>	yeah, the saved search is 27339 blockers sorted by priority
[04:28:58] <robla>	(or at least, is supposed to be....I can never tell if I'm getting the sort order saved)
[04:28:58] <hexmode>	looks saved
[04:43:29] <hexmode>	robla: http://eiximenis.wikimedia.org/weekend-sprint # going over this email now
[04:44:46] *robla 	figures out how to futz with the wording...
[04:46:06] <robla>	hexmode: I'm still reading the full list myself.  Most of them are currently set to "normal" priority
[04:46:51] <hexmode>	well, that just means we want them all fixed in the next release ;)
[04:48:01] <robla>	there are some that should get fixed by end of next week, though  :)
[04:48:08] <hexmode>	oh, yes
[04:48:13] <hexmode>	totally
[04:52:12] <robla>	hexmode: okee doke, see what you think of the paragraph I inserted, and feel free to make it your own or nuke it
[04:54:29] <hexmode>	excellent.... sending.
[04:55:23] <robla>	hexmode: there's a stray question mark you left in etherpad
[04:55:42] <robla>	dunno if you edited it out in your email, but I fixed it in etherpad
[04:56:07] <hexmode>	thanks for noticing, got it in my email just now
[04:57:20] <robla>	hexmode: oh, one other thing if you haven't sent
[04:57:59] <robla>	the links are to the dependency tree, which is sorted by number instead of priority
[04:58:35] <hexmode>	k, will note
[05:02:57] <hexmode>	robla: comments on the parenthetical I just added to your para?
[05:03:36] <robla>	ah...sure, that makes sense
[05:04:07] <hexmode>	sending
[05:12:24] <robla>	this is great, thanks hexmode.
[09:32:39] <thedj>	man people are impatient
[09:32:51] <thedj>	emptying and readding entire categories just to 'fix sorting'
[09:38:17] <Nikerabbit>	https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27553
[19:39:13] <Reedy>	Hmm. Why's the GeSHi version on the cluster so relatively old?
[19:44:28] <^demon>	Requires manual updating iirc :\
[19:44:34] <^demon>	We don't use the svn:external
[19:45:20] <Reedy>	Mhmm, I noticed that
[19:45:36] <Reedy>	Just wondering if there was a specific reason, or just a case of it's not been updated (not asked for etc)