[00:09:03] http://www.bobhobbs.com/files/kr_lovecraft.html [00:09:55] Exercise 4-12. Adapt the ideas of Cthulhu() to write a recursive version of the Forbidden Song of Hali; that is, to unravel the fibres of reality and allow the icy liquid darkness of Carcosa to devour your mind. [00:16:32] robla: try now [00:17:02] i have not committed changes yet [00:17:21] pdhanda: much better [00:17:45] Are you blowing up Pakistan again? [00:17:56] guillom: i would never :P [00:18:05] Not on purpose, maybe! [00:18:48] hah [00:19:55] pdhanda: this problem has been there a while and we just didn't notice it, huh? [00:20:14] seems that way… it was a fairly simple code fix [00:20:25] either that or the illness has taken over my brain [00:20:50] don't make us wish illness on you now [00:21:07] haha [00:22:38] ok i need to figure out why i cannot commit to chad-pre-wmf-merge [00:22:45] robla: can you? [00:25:19] pdhanda: are you trying to check in from prototype? [00:26:23] today yeah, earlier it failed from my local machine also [00:26:26] let me try again [00:26:55] I checked out from prototype using http rather than svn+ssh, so that's probably the problem there [00:28:29] nope same error from my dev machine [00:28:41] what's the exact error? [00:28:42] arrrrghh [00:28:45] i see what it is [00:36:12] can someone pass this along to neilk ? [00:36:13] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Usability_issues_and_ideas [00:36:22] last post by Saibo [00:40:28] ok robla all good [00:41:35] pdhanda: great! so...where are we at this point? [00:42:51] so i checked in that fix. i'll change that notice on old revisions(?) and try to figure out that annoying js bug that's been driving me nuts [00:43:04] unless something more important needs to be done [00:49:18] pdhanda: actually, just skip ahead to the js bug [00:49:28] ok [00:52:52] pdhanda: I think the thing to tackle if you're really feeling ambitious is to replace the javascript-y icon thing with what Brandon mocked up [00:53:05] the piece I'm referring to... [00:55:07] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/PendingChangs-Nov16-Pending.png <-the small text under the blue box you just implemented [00:55:47] robla: yeah i gave it a brief attempt a few days ago… then i ran into complications and decided to put it on hold [00:55:47] (i.e. "review pending revisions <- previous revision | accepted revision ..." [00:56:11] ok, we can punt on that [00:56:24] i may not be able to make that happen in the next few days [00:56:41] maybe after everything else is done I'll pick that up again and see how it goes [00:56:50] the other thing that occurred to me after seeing Aaron's comment is that maybe doing some code review on trunk commits to FlaggedRevs over the past few months [00:57:17] esp. changes that weren't Aaron's [01:00:08] yeah that will be useful [01:15:51] k I'm off for a bit. need a break [16:06:15] No robla yet.. [17:49:33] No Zak yet.. [18:06:12] Reedy: how's it going? [18:06:29] So, I'm starting into the article assessment code [18:08:30] Headachey most of today again :( [18:09:44] TrevorParscal, have we got a new name for it yet? [18:10:09] yes, SuperArticleAssessmentDemoPilot-v2 [18:10:23] Is it Assessment or Feedback? [18:10:41] hi reedy! feedback still [18:11:10] It was Article Assessment Pilot for first time :P [18:12:33] ah - right [18:12:47] svn move [18:12:49] *TrevorParscal commits code to extensions/ArticleFeedbackFromPeopleWhoLikeToClickOnStars [18:13:01] :D [18:13:08] Can we have an ADD version? [18:13:09] :D [18:13:36] with blink? [18:13:43] *blink* [18:13:45] blink tags FTW [18:14:00] TrevorParscal, we need them fixing in Chrome though [21:28:28] hey alolita, guillom [21:28:36] flipzagging: hey! [21:28:46] flipzagging: how are things [21:28:50] going ok [21:28:51] hi [21:28:59] molliug: olleh. [21:29:17] molliug: hey ... its funny to see your handle flipped [21:29:28] so let's start [21:29:35] flipzagging - you first [21:29:41] all right so, I haven't heard anything from Calcey today [21:30:03] have they sent you any questions at all or updates to our wiki pages [21:30:05] I committed a fix yesterday but there are a couple of tests they're going to do which I know won't work - working on fixes. [21:30:09] nothing [21:30:15] nothing = nothing from Calcey. [21:30:29] ok - i can ping them later today [21:30:46] how are the bug fixes coming along - any major blockers [21:30:55] or just little things [21:30:55] i'm just working on getting a few things working, mostly page one issues with files and errors [21:31:13] well, they aren't little things, but not blockers either [21:31:28] for instance we want there to be a confirmation step before going to the next step [21:31:31] these are filed in bugzilla [21:31:36] yes [21:31:37] all of them, to my knowledge. [21:32:03] is the confirmation step a popup or just a message [21:32:13] i.e. is this modal interaction [21:32:17] and I reviewed all the community feedback that our community has been generating. No new showstoppers, but the sad thing is that they are issues we knew about for a while. [21:32:33] tell me if you need help reviewing the feedback [21:32:34] confirmation step is not a modal dialog as I understand it [21:32:38] that is unfortunate but we will keep working on them [21:33:26] this is what I expect confirm to look like: you press upload, uploads happen (or don't). Then the confirm step says "That was all good, onwards" or "Those all failed, retry?" or "Some failed, retry? Or just go to the next page". [21:33:30] any specific bug nos that you need to address right now before moving on to launch next week [21:33:37] this is the biggest one. [21:33:47] um, don't remember the # right off. [21:33:56] its definitely a major thing we need to have working right [21:33:58] but it ties together all the complaints about errors and other interaction on the file page. [21:34:09] ok - makes sense [21:34:09] so it will knock off about five at once [21:34:47] awesome - let's fix this major issue first and then look at other areas [21:34:57] can molliug help you in any way [21:35:09] testing or following up on feedback [21:35:23] or syncing up bug fix updates in bugzilla [21:35:30] well, it's been a long time since we were talking regularly about interface, and I find I have incomplete notes about what certain requested changes were supposed to look like. [21:35:46] maybe just go through the whole thing and flesh out what certain bugs actually mean [21:36:08] unless there are docs or sketches for all the bugs somewhere that I never marked down. [21:36:21] well - it would help enormously if molliug could sync up what we spec'd out for the various interfaces vs. what is [21:36:23] molliug: you are out tomorrow? [21:36:41] molliug: ? [21:36:44] everything is supposed to be in bugzilla, but if details are missing, I'm happy to add more [21:36:47] (yes, typing :) [21:36:54] :-) [21:37:01] well, what's in bugzilla is like "fix such-and-such" [21:37:35] e.g. https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24699 [21:37:50] I can't remember if we ever made sketches. I just gave you my interpretation of what this bug means above. [21:38:11] right - molliug - it would help enormously if you could sync-up your initial spec with what has been developed and mark out differences/what's missing/or different [21:38:40] well, I anticipate that as I code it I will realize what we might not have thought of [21:38:58] Ok, so the problem, as I understand it, is that we created these bugs a long time ago, when we all had the same understanding of what they meant, and now we're not sure what these few words mean, so I should elaborate on them in the bug reports. Is that accurate? [21:39:26] well no, what I would like is to quickly go through them with you (in person or over IRC) and see if I'm missing anything in my recollections or whatever. [21:39:37] flipzagging: yes, that would be great [21:39:45] to work with molliug on [21:39:46] ok, then we can do that this afternoon, flipzagging [21:39:49] yes. [21:39:52] awesome [21:39:55] there aren't that many. [21:40:07] flipzagging, let's say 3pm? (I haven't had lunch yet) [21:40:10] yeah [21:40:13] great [21:40:16] good :-) [21:40:30] and molliug what's new on your side [21:40:33] actually maybe we can do this async. I'll leave comments on the bugs I think are problematic or require more interpretation. You can come by and say yes/no. [21:40:46] flipzagging, what works best for you [21:40:55] what I just proposed would work fine. [21:41:01] then let's do that [21:41:05] coolio. [21:41:15] flipzagging: would it not work to go through a list of bugs and discuss them together (even if one irc) [21:41:19] alolita, I'm working on the behind-the-scenes licensing tutorial blog post [21:41:31] molliug: coolness [21:41:43] can we review it by friday? [21:42:00] No, not this one; another one :) [21:42:21] you mean the blog post you want Michael to write? [21:42:27] Michael = Michael Bartalos [21:42:28] let me recap [21:42:34] molliug: is this your personal post or the one michael is adding to [21:42:46] (I'm doing a lot of writing these days so let me list what I'm working on) [21:42:56] that would help us :-) [21:43:05] understand better [21:43:46] there are a couple of pieces of writing I'm working on these days: the upcoming announcement about upload wizard, my own behind-the-scenes blog post, the report, and other notes long overdue like the Wikimania report [21:44:23] the one I'm working on today is my own behind-the-scenes blog post, that hopefully will be linked from the blog post on the wikimedia blog, along with Michael's [21:44:25] clearer? [21:44:42] definitely good to know [21:45:18] yesterday I finished the Wikimania notes, just haven't published it yet [21:45:21] flipzagging: i would like you to contribute your thoughts on the project too and a tech blog post :-) [21:45:56] molliug: it will be nice to read about your thoughts on wikimania since i wasn't there [21:46:33] yeah, I know some of these posts are long overdue. [21:46:35] molliug: you could incorporate an q and a with flipzagging too [21:46:38] alolita: sure [21:46:59] he's been our coder-in-chief you know [21:47:04] alolita, do you mean plan an IRC office hour? [21:47:04] couldn't have done it without him [21:47:43] molliug: an q&a blog post with flipzagging just as you are doing with m bartolos [21:47:58] and an IRC office hour is a great idea too [21:48:19] I don't know what a Q&A would look like. Maybe we could pick out common q's people have had. [21:48:25] or technical q's, anyway. [21:48:47] oh, I'm not doing a q&a with Michael, I'll just link to his blog post; if flipzagging has time to write and publish a tech blog post by then, I'll be happy to link to it; I think it'd be awesome [21:48:48] flipzagging: technical q&a s of course and also getting your view point across about the project [21:49:34] molliug: ah, understood - yes definitely having links to other posts would be great [21:50:06] so we are going to definitely have a few posts next week [21:50:29] molliug: did peteforsyth have any more questions for you [21:50:35] Nope. [21:50:42] ok cool [21:51:01] so that's all from me on upload wizard today [21:51:14] and hope your bugzilla session goes well this afternoon [21:51:19] ok [21:51:19] let's touch base tomorrow [21:51:26] ttyl [21:51:27] molliug: you're wfh tomorrow [21:51:35] yes [21:51:39] I'll be in the office on Friday [21:51:47] flipzagging: cool, ttyl then [21:52:11] GO TEAM [21:52:15] molliug: ok - see you on friday then - and look forward to your blog posts [21:52:33] GO TEAM indeed :-) we need RoanKattouw [21:52:40] ttyl then! [21:53:01] ok, I'm going to go afk for lunch then [21:54:27] cool [22:18:24] *jorm returns. [23:09:36] hey, guys [23:10:15] i saw this bug for PdfHandler [23:10:17] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22902 [23:10:35] I am about to start writing a patch for it, if anyone's interested :) [23:11:58] Holek, Awesome, patches are always welcome :) [23:12:32] yeah, after 3 months, I've finally added my USERINFO file.. [23:12:42] It's time I start writing some code ;) [23:18:06] Reedy: you are a Coder on mediawiki.org wiki, right? [23:18:16] Yus [23:18:27] could you link my svn account to wiki account? [23:19:07] Yup [23:19:09] Both same name? [23:19:13] yep :) [23:19:17] ta muchly [23:19:33] I see no Holek.. [23:20:17] "holek"? [23:20:29] Author is probably being daft and cached [23:20:41] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/76914 [23:20:46] Holek, sort your autoprops! [23:20:54] This author is linked to the wiki user Holek (Talk | contribs | block) (unlink?) [23:20:57] Someones already done it [23:21:07] oh, cool! [23:21:11] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Subversion/auto-props [23:21:21] and I've already changed my ./subversion/config [23:21:26] ~ * [23:24:16] oh well, thanks for the follow-up, I'll have a look inside ~/.subversion again :) [23:27:30] heh [23:27:54] did you actually enable the autoprops? [23:29:11] yep [23:29:12] enable-auto-props = yes [23:29:22] uncommented in ~/.subversion/config [23:34:22] oh well, I will just svn propset svn:eol-style native * in my edits