[01:58:06] Drewmutt, good evening! [01:58:21] StormyWaves: And to you! Starting your 3 day weekend hopefully? [01:58:33] I am, fortunately alive and well which is good :) [01:58:47] Any weekend plans? [02:00:19] StormyWaves: Not really, but judging by the weather, I imagine the beach will be involved :) [02:00:29] Ah, excellent choice :) [02:01:04] Got any AfCs you need peeked at? I was about to just pluck randoms from the list. [02:04:39] Ah, not any that I've immediately seen. But I'll take a look. [02:05:36] Ah, I found one so far: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BULQ Submitted twice is always fun, but three times is funny :D [02:05:37] [WIKIPEDIA] Draft:BULQ | "Comment: To explain in detail, the information and sources are still closer to announcements or notices including republished ones (as that's a common marketing use); but any of those can't establish notability and what we need is instead uninvolved major independent news without any of the forementioned..." [02:08:11] Fortunately, since good things come in 2, I found another one next to that too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dreamstime (equally resubmitted) [02:08:12] [WIKIPEDIA] Draft:Dreamstime | "Comment: In that case, it would help to emphasize only the best amount of major independent news without influences or ties to announcements or notices. SwisterTwister talk 19:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC) Comment: Deleted before in promotionalism concerns and this is no different when considering the information..." [02:15:47] There's never a day someone isn't mistaking Wikipedia as a free webhost, after all :P [02:16:03] Heh, that's why U5 exists. [02:16:21] Done with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BULQ# .. looking at the other. [02:16:22] [WIKIPEDIA] Draft:BULQ# | "Comment: There two issues here, in regards to establishing notability: Reliability of sources. Many of the sources are either non-notable blogs, or simple press releases. Neither of these are dependable independent media outlet with editorial oversight. Depth of coverage. Although there are a couple..." [02:22:07] Fortunately, there was actually a third one I noticed next to it, which was from a few weeks ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Prolitec :) [02:22:08] [WIKIPEDIA] Draft:Prolitec | "Comment: Many of the cited sources have connections to the subject. Find independent sources to show that the company is notable. KSFT (t|c) 20:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Comment: Only an advertised business profile and the current information and sources is no different, notability cannot be inherited..." [03:36:51] Drewmutt, good evening again! :) [03:36:59] StormyWaves: Hey, welcome back! [03:37:15] :) [03:38:40] Had you noticed I linked one other earlier? It was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Prolitec Not any different than the last 2 either, in terms of promotion :P [03:38:41] [WIKIPEDIA] Draft:Prolitec | "Comment: Many of the cited sources have connections to the subject. Find independent sources to show that the company is notable. KSFT (t|c) 20:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Comment: Only an advertised business profile and the current information and sources is no different, notability cannot be inherited..." [17:28:18] Drewmutt, good morning! [17:28:49] StormyWaves: 'morning to you too! [19:30:26] Drewmutt, hello and cheers again! :) [19:30:48] StormyWaves: Hey there! I'm actually on a real computer this time, therefore mildly useful :) [19:31:05] Could I get your thoughts on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Prolitec ? [19:31:06] [WIKIPEDIA] Draft:Prolitec | "Comment: Many of the cited sources have connections to the subject. Find independent sources to show that the company is notable. KSFT (t|c) 20:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Comment: Only an advertised business profile and the current information and sources is no different, notability cannot be inherited..." [19:31:27] It was resubmitted, that's the third time now which is usually not a good sign :P [19:33:23] Heh, I've seen more. < 10 is a good sign these days :P [19:33:26] Looking.. [19:34:48] I remember one not too long ago that was literally 15 times :D [19:37:34] Yeah, that's usually when the ban hammer strikes.. [19:39:04] Can't say I would object either, especially in the obvious cases :P [20:18:56] StormyWaves: Btw, didn't forget aboutcha, it's just quite the write-up. [20:19:02] :) [21:12:02] Drewmutt, hello again! :) [21:19:05] StormyWaves: hey there! All done with that AfC, btw. [21:19:42] I noticed, thank you. I noticed a Draft I reviewed was resubmitted. Are you available to take a look? :) [21:19:59] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ByHours On its 4th review this time :P [21:20:00] [WIKIPEDIA] Draft:ByHours | "Comment: Per Zppix, and SwisterTwister. The sources provided seem to be promotional. SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 18:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Comment: Too suggestive a business profile and the current information and sources is equally promotional or simply not significant; what we need..." [21:21:16] Not at the moment, since I'm mobile. But when I get to a computer, I'd be happy to! [21:24:37] Cheers :) [22:15:21] Drewmutt, welcome back! :) Happy Labor Day Weekend! :) [22:16:36] StormyWaves: You too! I'm trying to sneak in some gardening with limited success :) [22:17:04] Ah, gardening is always fun regardless though :) [22:17:42] Yep! Trying to get my watermelons happy. [22:18:46] Ah, watermelons! Absolutely delicious! :) [22:22:48] Yep! And luckily some ladybugs came by to save my romaine from aphids. [22:29:38] :)