[02:19:47] Do you think we should add the Wikidata items that do not exist to the title blacklist? I don't think it's very necessary but there were some very negative reactions when one of those articles were created. [02:20:02] This is on abstractwiki [02:25:45] For same class item like geolocation, I think it has similar lead paragraph, and then you can write a special function to handle it. (re @dvd_ccc27919: I was wandering: in the future, Abstract Wikipedia articles will probably need not to generate single isolated fragments, but in...) [02:37:47] I think in the end you will get something like grammar engine to deal with this, see [[Abstract Wikipedia/Template Language for Wikifunctions]]. (re @dvd_ccc27919: Do you have any example? For now, every all-in-one functions I've seen in Abstract Wikipedia don't work for Italian (where it is...) [08:17:18] T424931? (re @Feeglgeef: Do you think we should add the Wikidata items that do not exist to the title blacklist? I don't think it's very necessary but th...) [10:33:14] I was thinking about the need to handle a context (as described for example in https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Type_proposals/Semantic_unit/Douglas_Adams) that is common to all the article, and that needs to be modified by the language generation functions. Due to the purely functional nature of Wikifunctions, the only way to allow this would be [10:33:14] to define the ent [10:33:15] ire article as an input of a single function call, that then would have to generate all the text. What am I worrying about is that, with this approach, there would be no way that the entire function executes in reasonable times (for now, even the generation of 3 simple sentences in a single function call time out) (re @Cooper: I think in the end you will get [10:33:15] something like gramma [10:33:17] r engine to deal with this, see Abstract Wikipedia/Template Language for Wi...) [11:32:51] I expect that the human editor will still flag which concepts in an abstract sentence should be wikilinked. Similarly they can flag when a person is first/subsequently referred to. (re @dvd_ccc27919: I was wandering: in the future, Abstract Wikipedia articles will probably need not to generate single isolated fragments, but in...) [12:12:49] It can be difficult to guarantee that a person is first mentioned in a specific sentence in all the languages (for example, in some languages an item could first be mentioned in the main sentence, while in another it could be first mentioned in a subordinate). Still, there are a lot of different reasons why we need a shared context, like keeping track what has [12:12:50] been already mentio [12:12:50] ned (for determination), in which context... (re @u99of9: I expect that the human editor will still flag which concepts in an abstract sentence should be wikilinked. Similarly they can f...) [12:27:16] For example: consider that you want to insert a Wikilink to "book". A language A (like English) could be rendered as: [12:27:17] Douglas Adams was a writer. He was born in 1952 and died in 2014. He wrote many Science-Fiction *books*. [12:27:18] Now consider a language B, in which you cannot say "writer", but you have to say something like "he wrote books". A rendered text could be: [12:27:20] Douglas Adams wrote *books*. He lived from 1952 to 2014. The books he wrote were Science-Fiction books. (re @dvd_ccc27919: It can be difficult to guarantee that a person is first mentioned in a specific sentence in all the languages (for example, in s...)