[15:39:49] <KasTas>	 Hey, is there a consensus on how structure entities of "ambassador of CountryA to CountryB"?
[15:40:05] <KasTas>	 I can see at least a few different ways in the wild...
[15:40:23] <KasTas>	 One being instance of: position, subclass of: ambassador of CountryA, ambassador to CountryB
[15:40:35] <KasTas>	 Another - instance of: ambassador of CountryA; ambassador to CountryB.
[15:40:49] <KasTas>	 For example: Q112245795 and Q69750355
[15:42:24] <KasTas>	 Second way intuitively makes more sense to me. But it seems not as common at list in case of "ambassador of Lithuania"
[15:42:34] <KasTas>	 *at least
[16:10:44] <Lucas_WMDE>	 KasTas: I haven’t looked into the items, but from what you describe, the first way makes more sense to me
[16:14:29] <KasTas>	 mhm.
[16:14:59] <KasTas>	 One of the arguments I could think to back the first option - not abusing "instance of" with multiple entries
[16:17:29] <Lucas_WMDE>	 the main thing I have in mind is whether the P31/P279 levels are properly arranged or getting mixed up
[16:17:35] <Lucas_WMDE>	 and now I’m starting to second-guess myself 😅
[16:17:43] <Lucas_WMDE>	 I think I’d have to work it out with pen and paper
[16:21:27] <KasTas>	 I see. You're rather getting from the perspectice of messy nesting. 
[16:21:54] <KasTas>	 having (P31/P279*) all other the SPARQL also does not feel very nice 
[16:28:04] <KasTas>	 *over