[15:18:38] @posix_memalign and @raidarr I think we should talk a little about this month's MIraheze monthly [15:19:01] I think a special section is called for, since it is 1 year [15:19:30] and considering we technically make up the whole editing team, we should at least give a few words, or at least collectively come up with something [20:00:22] Sounds good. Anything you think we should cover besides the basic stuff (it has been a year since Raidarr wrote the first issue, blah blah blah)? [21:06:25] maybe a few words from raidarr himself on how/why he founded it, etc etc [21:06:51] or maybe a stats thing like "12 issues! this number contributes! 3 editors!" etc etc [21:11:11] you meant to say "contributors" [21:11:24] back off, it's my shift rn! [21:25:24] Maybe some good old fashion stats? X users edited an MM article, ballpark Y views, amalgamating wiki stats over the year [21:26:50] um [21:27:14] [1/2] It's up to @raidarr then. If he has the time and interest I wouldn't mind letting him write most of it. Would've been an interesting perspective on how MH Monthly has evolved in the past year. [21:27:14] [2/2] As for why it was founded, I suspect https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Raidarr/Miraheze_strategy and https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Tali64%C2%B3/Miraheze_Community_News are the inspirations. [21:29:11] and i think you discussed it a little yourself [21:30:21] you said it was uhhhh what [21:30:29] that it was june the redesign [21:30:50] and by july the standard sections ere established [21:49:30] Yep. And after that there weren't many changes, though if readers get tired of of a column we can always rotate it out. [21:50:12] [1/3] Oh I just noticed that I haven't decided on M of the M. Per tradition it'll be someone who recently gained advanced rights, though I wonder if we should recognize other volunteers who [21:50:13] [2/3] 1. Have been around for a long time [21:50:13] [3/3] 2. Are still highly active [22:44:05] recognizing non-titled yet regular contributors would be a lovely evolution I think [22:44:39] I don't know if I have anything terribly insightful to add but I could try