[00:27:21] Well lookie day [00:28:59] :angel: Been meaning to start practicing wiki reviews for months, I just finally remembered and had time to today lmao [01:19:53] I’m not good reviewer myself but my glancing 2 cents, 1st one, asking a colleague is a good choice yes, personally I might ask for clarification on the scope as it may be a translation issue on what exactly is intended to be covered [01:21:23] 2 was already updated when i see it and yeah agreed [01:27:36] honestly dont know what to make of 81 [01:29:29] I'd maybe lean needs more details, but it looks like a private journal project for schoolwork [01:31:09] The mention of other people editing it was mostly what made me iffy on it tbh [15:00:43] @raidarr saw that guy you blocked, dang! [15:00:49] I really hope that was a troll [15:00:53] Because if not…. [18:45:31] Some people are unfortunately not the nicest round here [18:45:41] But we don't tolerate abusive behaviour towards volunteers [21:52:53] if its a troll, its a troll with a broader online footprint dating back years [21:52:55] some loony stuff tbh [21:53:21] tldr they want everyone to invest in them and insult the vast majority of possible investors and between grammatical errors and the tone scare off the rest [21:53:22] Yeah [21:53:35] and also have widespread complaints nobody is giving them money [21:53:41] and also can't seem to stay unbanned on facebook et al [21:55:31] At least they have plenty of energy for all these activities, I guess [21:55:47] I was almost tempted to watch an interview that was published across various backwater alt youtubes but I simply have better things to do