[05:57:53] <MirahezeRelay>	 <wikitideharej> [1/2] Starting to work on my re-draft of the wiki reviewers policy. https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Harej/Wiki_reviewers
[05:57:53] <MirahezeRelay>	 <wikitideharej> [2/2] I have two goals: (1) clean up the existing writing that's there (2) try to canonize what is essential wiki reviewer guidance. As we get more wikis and more wiki reviewers it becomes more important for everyone to agree on a way to work together. To that end, any recommendations you have from your experience would be welcome
[06:02:16] <MirahezeRelay>	 <wikitideharej> (It's based on pre-existing essays to some extent (thanks NotAracham and Raidarr!), but those go into more specific detail; this should capture the minimum required element)
[06:18:18] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> [1/3] I think there's functionally two features: 
[06:18:18] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> [2/3] * What is a wiki reviewer, what do they do? - this is the policy page
[06:18:19] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> [3/3] * How does one wiki review, and how does one do it well? - this is the handbook page
[06:18:48] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> I don't think they necessarily need to be the same page, but yeah, both mine and raidarr's essays probably need some modernization + condensing
[06:24:04] <MirahezeRelay>	 <wikitideharej> I basically agree they should be separate. The question is what should be considered non-negotiable and documented in policy
[06:24:47] <MirahezeRelay>	 <wikitideharej> On that or anything related to being a wiki reviewer
[09:57:30] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> I've always found kinda the essentials to be you're interpreting and implementing based off the written matter of the content policy and on occasion other policies as applicable though enforcement seems to be leaning extrajudicial anyway
[09:58:36] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> I think keeping the split, one canon guide to help reviewers with steward endorsement which can probably leverage my volunteer doc system to make a canon version, and being a bit broader but canonizing the 'purpose' of wiki creators more strictly would be a way to tackle that
[09:59:10] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> enforcing both on policy and on current conventions and the latter can be linked from the policy as additional topic scrutiny is linked from the content policy
[09:59:37] <MirahezeRelay>	 <raidarr> NA's version is made with more current conventions in mind, my essay is probably somewhat obsolete
[16:37:28] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pskyechology, replying to pskyechology> eligible for closure now
[17:27:30] <MirahezeRelay>	 <justanotherdarkmodeuser, replying to pskyechology> It's basically [wp:snowball] so hopefully they get it
[17:29:25] <MirahezeRelay>	 <pskyechology> rather the reverse/positive of it which is [[WP:AVALANCHE]] or SNOWPRO
[17:29:25] <MirahezeRelay>	 <Wiki-Bot#2998> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AVALANCHE>
[17:29:36] <MirahezeRelay>	 <notaracham> I'll get it this evening if someone uninvolved doesn't get it first