[19:20:38] Out of curiousity, when there's a dump generated like https://dumps.wikimedia.org/enwiki/20210101/ when exactly is the snapshot dated at? 00:00:01 UTC on January 1? 00:00:01 in San Fran? Random time on January 1 depending on server load? [19:27:24] I'd presume it's UTC [19:27:38] Ariel would be the person to ask [20:50:02] do note that the timeing is not exact [21:41:20] Is closing https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T260003#6717347 as resolved acceptable if it's an AWB bug? [21:45:09] Thanks JJMC89[m] [21:45:17] Me and coco have a history so I didn't want to act [21:46:04] There wasn't a code change, so it definitely isn't resolved. [21:46:27] JJMC89[m]: probably them doing something strange then [21:46:30] Assuming it was an issue on their side → invalid [21:46:36] Yeah probably best [21:46:47] * RhinosF1 won't say what he's thinking in his head [22:12:38] Reedy who's ariel? are they pingable? [22:30:43] They're apergos on irc [22:47:08] ugh there's a lot of confusing merging of duplicates in that task history [22:51:27] AntiComposite: they somehow created the task about 5 times then argued over which they preferred [22:51:38] seems about right [23:09:15] AntiComposite well they're not on IRC right now it seems. Do they have a WMF/foowiki username/email? [23:12:10] Headbomb: they show up on Whois. They're just not in here. (Re apergos). I see them in -operations and -sre which are probably most appropiate for this issue out of the channels I share with them.