[15:19:33] I think we have a Phab spammer, anyone mind disabling? https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T255571 [15:24:05] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/Kieron231/ done by a colleague [16:51:01] does anyone know why if i log in, im not automatically logged to other wikis.....requiring me to reload the page to do so? [17:10:09] Wiki13: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:How_to_debug/Login_problems [17:10:29] hm ok [17:19:46] andre__: from what I see CA only logs me in on *.wikipedia.org on Firefox but no other domains, google chrome with my adblocker disabled and in normal browsing mode doesnt even login at all... im trying to make sense of this, but I cant... :/ [17:23:55] and some sites like commons make the login attempt only when loading a page.... lets say thats quite annoying too... [17:25:15] tried deleting cookies already? [17:28:12] yes, same response to that... [17:28:57] this is quite a PITA considering I have 2FA enabled.... [17:38:14] From what I figured out so far, in a older version of Firefox (70) it somewhat works okayish but still requires me to reload the page to fully login. This is with a fresh profile and no add-ons installed @andre__ [17:38:41] seems like something changed in the newer versions and broke CA login, atleast it did for me [17:46:30] Wondering if https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T255179 could be slightly related [17:53:08] Hard to say, but from memory I think issue was already there prior to that incident [18:11:38] Nobody has an idea about "What's the load order for common.js, vector.js, Special:MyPage/common.js, and ResourceLoader?"… ? [18:18:12] xover, as far as I can tell, it's undocumented, so you should treat it as undefined [18:19:56] AntiComposite: Thanks. [18:20:26] How about a de facto order between a Gadget and the user's common.js? [18:21:23] Think Gadget that let's the user define custom JS functions and register them to be called by the Gadget. [18:21:32] *lets [18:24:18] My instinct is that if the Gadget waits for $('document').ready() then the user's common.js will of necessity have finished executing. [18:24:36] But there I'm in a bit over my head. [21:16:08] [[Tech]]; Ltulli; /* Engenharia de Interiores */ new section; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=20180075&oldid=20169516&rcid=15687249 [21:18:57] [[Tech]]; Ltulli; /* Engenharia de Interiores */; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=20180079&oldid=20180075&rcid=15687261 [21:19:21] [[Tech]]; Ltulli; /* Engenharia de Interiores */; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=20180080&oldid=20180079&rcid=15687262 [21:34:26] [[Tech]]; Platonides; Undo edits by Ltulli; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=20180120&oldid=20180080&rcid=15687324 [22:59:18] I'm getting an error at https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/examine/76582973 [22:59:24] [55c4d3c9-7ef8-414b-b6ea-9c5310aa62c5] 2020-06-16 22:58:09: Fatal exception of type "Error" [23:01:10] If this isn't an already known issue, I can post on Phabricator [23:03:33] Erutuon, feel free to [23:04:56] Erutuon: No I cannot find a ticket in Phab about it yet [23:05:13] 55c4d3c9-7ef8-414b-b6ea-9c5310aa62c5 is "Error from line 134 of /srv/mediawiki/php-1.35.0-wmf.36/extensions/AbuseFilter/includes/Views/AbuseFilterViewExamine.php: Call to a member function dumpAllVars() on null" [23:05:30] not sure if that's the filter's fault or some code change [23:06:31] group0 and group1 did get a deployment today [23:07:40] that's .37 though [23:10:26] oh, I've got it; it's a deleted revision [23:11:03] still shouldn't throw an exception, still worth a phab task [23:12:44] oh, looks like the train rolled back on group1 anyway [23:12:58] Oh, I spoke too soon; the "examine" interface doesn't use revision ids. I was trying to examine this edit: https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?oldid=59551761 [23:15:12] Posted [23:15:17] T255633 [23:15:17] T255633: Error when examining edit in Abuse Filter management interface - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T255633 [23:18:43] did that edit actually trigger an abusefilter? [23:19:25] I only see 3 entries in the abuse log, all were disallow (though some may be hidden from me) [23:28:24] No, it didn't [23:28:54] but I was checking to see if there was any abuse filter variable that indicated that the edit used Huggle [23:30:07] if it doesn't trigger an abusefilter, no abuse log information is saved [23:31:25] That's true about Special:AbuseLog, but I was looking at Special:AbuseFilter/examine, which shows information about all edits as far as I know [23:34:08] huh, so it does [23:36:24] easiest way to detect huggle would be to add a "huggle" tag to Special:Tags, then add "tag: huggle" to the project config file [23:37:06] that is, if AF can detect tags... [23:37:40] I guess not; no mention of "tag" in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AbuseFilter/Rules_format [23:38:34] That makes sense because abuse filters themselves can add tags