[14:16:58] Hi. I have just install and configured mediawiki software through git. I want to check installed extensions. But the page localhost/WIKINAME/Special:Version responds with an error of "Not Found". Can anyone help me with this issue. [14:20:58] Surely thats your webserver not MW? [14:25:33] Reedy:Yeah. I got my error. Anyways thanks [19:54:18] hey, quick q: is there a range limit for which a block is enforced? I stumbled upon a 2000::/3 block, which thankfully doesn't seem to be working [19:55:01] Tks4Fish: i think /16 [19:55:11] iirc [19:55:38] probably different rule should apply for v4 vs v6 IPs [19:55:53] IPv4 is /16, IPv6 is /32 [19:56:04] Uh, /19 for IPv6 [20:00:21] ah, ty folks :) [20:00:39] I saw the /3 and I was like WTF [20:00:50] but also saw it wasn't being enforced, which is a good thing [21:14:44] List of the 100 most viewed diagrams (in the past 7, 30, 60, 90 and 365 days) on a Wikipedia that are not in SVG-format. How do I most easily go about making that list? [21:20:12] I guess you'd go by most-viewed files and try filtering from there .... [21:21:20] doesn't seem particularly easy unless they're all categorized [21:21:37] * as such [21:22:36] most diagrams are probably on commons.wikimedia.org and not on individual wikis [21:22:44] they are then included from commons in the wiki [21:23:28] how to identify what actually counts as a diagram seems hard... besides categories, yea, what DSquirrelGM said [21:24:37] but just as an aside - I WAS thinking about the whole png vs svg thing for such diagrams - really, having them as png makes zero sense [21:25:08] should all be redone in svg tbh [21:25:32] well, it sounds like answering the question would be a pre-requisite for exactly that [21:26:13] except you could skip the "most used" part and just do any diagram and stop caring about "most used first".. if you can automate it [21:26:34] start off with looking at global file use reports I guess [21:27:16] yea, trying to find "most used" would likely take more effort than just going through all of them [21:44:15] Most used is easy with a db query [21:44:20] Finding what is a diagram is hard [21:45:14] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MostGloballyLinkedFiles [22:44:03] DSquirrelGM: The conversion from PNG to SVG is what I have in mind. Tagged is an obvious way of identifying. I'm also thinking a resolution to filesize ratio [22:47:18] Also: How does one move an image from being a PNG to an SVG? I know a PNG is replaced if one uploads another one with the same name, but I think the file-extension (".png") is part of that [22:49:48] What do you mean by move it? [22:54:49] Replace [22:55:15] Without having to edit all places that link to it. Hm. Maybe the links don't contain file-extensions? [22:55:31] No, you'd have to replace them all in the wikitext of each page [22:56:00] Sounds like a job for bots [22:56:00] Can we do cross-extension image redirects? [22:56:05] * bawolff honestly doesn't know [22:56:13] On commons there is a bot - User:CommonsDelinker [22:56:21] Yeah, a bot would make sense [22:56:32] bawolff: Easy enough to test [22:56:57] I know moving isn't allowed, but manually created redirect might be [22:57:50] Sounds a bit ugly [22:58:04] Is anyone around who actually knows things about accessibility/screen readers etc? Is it true that overflow:auto negatively effects them? I can't imagine how this could possibly be true. (Context https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic_data#Scrolling ) [22:58:15] I thought I'd seen PNGs being replaced by SVGs in a file's history in the past [23:11:31] Jonta, there is a bot that /could/ do it, (User:CommonsDelinker), but it is designed to refuse requests to replace raster files with SVGs. [23:11:42] "To avoid World War III" https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:CommonsDelinker/commands/documentation [23:13:55] bawolff, I'd suggest asking Graham87 on-wiki, they tend to be the expert on what actually affects screen readers since they edit using one. [23:16:08] AntiComposite: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CommonsDelinker/commands/talk#what's_the_anti-SVG_sentiment? [23:16:24] Seems there's no reason given [23:16:44] the reason is that people complained about it in the past [23:17:12] Where can I find these complaints? History of the discussion-page? [23:18:31] could be, could be on a bot noticeboard, on meta, on another wiki [23:18:47] :/ [23:21:36] looks like the note was added onl a few hours after the feature was released, while the feature was still only semi-auto [23:21:44] https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:CommonsDelinker/commands/documentation&diff=prev&oldid=4463440&diffmode=source [23:24:01] How did you find that change so quickly? I don't use any tools apart from what's in the browser by default, but am potentially interested in starting to [23:24:13] http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/wikiblame.php [23:25:08] Thank you [23:25:42] https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Orgullomoore&oldid=5456542#replacing_SVGs_with_the_bot [23:26:19] Apparently https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Siebrand is responsible for this bot now [23:26:27] not currently [23:26:49] right now Magnus Manske is the maintainer [23:27:48] with help from Steinsplitter and Zhuyifei1999 [23:27:49] I recognise that name [23:31:25] The "Don't really care, there were edit wars" comment is from 2007. My guess is that things have changed significantly since then.