[18:31:05] <ningu>	 mutante, Reedy: FYI https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Balinese#Proposal
[18:31:29] <ningu>	 some on-wiki discussion of the OFL question. still weird :)
[18:32:53] <Nemo_bis>	 OFL always creates some confusion
[18:35:44] <ningu>	 yeah?
[18:35:53] <ningu>	 I thought it was the default free font license
[18:47:53] <AntiComposite>	 the whole font licensing thing creates problems in the first place
[18:48:13] <AntiComposite>	 s/in the first place/on its own/
[18:48:38] <ningu>	 we picked OFL because it seemed like the consensus choice for a free/open license
[18:53:50] <Nemo_bis>	 yes it's fine
[18:54:26] <AntiComposite>	 yeah, I see nothing wrong with it
[18:55:23] <ningu>	 yeah, hence why I said, if you want to debate this go ahead, but it's not relevant to these particular fonts
[19:07:49] <ningu>	 AntiComposite: thanks for the comment. btw I don't think OFL is really like ND, is it? it just makes you change the font name
[19:08:03] <AntiComposite>	 I think they meant NC
[19:08:18] <ningu>	 maybe
[19:08:24] <AntiComposite>	 it's definitely not like ND -- modifications are explicitly allowed
[19:10:49] <ningu>	 I don't totally understand the point of not being able to sell the font itself -- maybe considered exploitative in some way
[19:11:20] <ningu>	 but seems kind of pointless too, if the font is also freely available, but maybe not everyone would realize that
[19:13:12] <ningu>	 I remember when it was common to buy debian on cd and that was normal and reasonable
[19:13:50] <AntiComposite>	 yeah, that's mostly targeted at those font websites that will suck up every free font they can find and sell them, usually in bulk
[19:13:58] <ningu>	 ok, I see
[19:14:01] <AntiComposite>	 like getty images does with nasa photos