[00:12:58] <apergos>	 ah boo
[00:13:28] <apergos>	 if they show up again can you get them to drop a task to analytics to update the schema or docs or whatever if there's really a missing column?
[00:13:52] <apergos>	 I think it's going to be a puppet html change but anyways if they don't have +2 I'll do it for them, the usual
[00:14:11] <apergos>	 Reedy: 
[01:13:45] <TaiwaniaJusto>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T240305
[01:14:31] <TaiwaniaJusto>	 I found this bug in this morning, and it's so weird.
[09:20:53] <ShakespeareFan00>	 Hi.
[09:21:05] <ShakespeareFan00>	 Is there anyone here that works with the parser backend?
[09:21:18] <ShakespeareFan00>	 Was reading some stuff in the CSS3 draft about footnotes
[09:21:54] <ShakespeareFan00>	 Which would make the Cite extension code shorter once browsers support it
[09:23:07] <ShakespeareFan00>	 https://drafts.csswg.org/css-gcpm/#footnotes
[09:23:26] <ShakespeareFan00>	 There's also some indication that some part of CSS3 will support 'leaders' 
[09:24:04] <ShakespeareFan00>	 https://drafts.csswg.org/css-content-3/#leaders
[09:25:10] <ShakespeareFan00>	 Once browsers support it, this would allow for a considerable reduction in the amount of transcluded content in respect of a use-case at English Wikisource
[09:26:22] <ShakespeareFan00>	 The current approach at English Wikisource, uses an embedded SPAN to do leaders, which when you have a number of entries can rapidly burst internal limits inside Mediawiki
[09:26:49] <ShakespeareFan00>	 The opinion of the developers here would be appreciated