[00:31:35] <[1997kB]> hey, anybody knows where renames are requested for wikitech ? [00:34:39] <[1997kB]> and for gerrit and wmflabs too. [01:46:39] [1997kB]: Filing a phabricator task is the way to request a rename of a Developer account (wikitech/gerrit/Cloud VPS). It might turn out to be easier to just create a new account and abandon your old one, but start with a task and we can help you figure that out. [01:50:06] <[1997kB]> ah thanks. btw I'm ok with my name :P It was for another user. I'll ask them to file a task. [01:51:44] <[1997kB]> also shell name can be changed without a task? [06:23:19] hello. Routes to Wikimedia Europe [91.198.174.0/24] are dead. [06:23:28] Is it an accident? [06:34:00] And I cannot see a route to 208.80.152.0/22 either. Perhaps it isn’t Wikimedia public servers’ location in the Western Hemisphere anymore? [06:34:13] routes from where? I'm in europe and viewing pages without issue [06:34:48] our network configuration has not changed, nor our server locations [06:35:08] I suppose it must be something on your end... [06:36:37] There was a route downtime. It is apparently fixed by now. [06:36:59] I checked from Russia, Ukraine, and Germany. [06:39:30] in the last few hours I don't see any alerts on our side. nor maintenance by our network providers/peers [06:39:39] but if it is worknig for you now, that's what's important [06:45:02] I possibly made some mistaken conclusions. 91.198.174.2 doesn’t work with traceroute(1) nicely (apparently some router discards packets on TTL=0). [06:45:41] it's very possible that somewhere in between is dropping those packets indeed [06:49:17] of course now that I have said that, we *just now* have an alert. but it is only for one vendor and one circuit :-) (you can follow that in #wikimedia-operations if you are curious) It should not in any way affect connectivity though. [09:03:12] Hello, I am trying to setup a local wikipedia mirror for testing purposes, but I am having some issues with the import of the database dumps. Can you recommend any tool to import the data on a local machine? I tried a direct import but its very slow and wp-mirror, but it seems to be very outdated ( http://www.nongnu.org/wp-mirror/ ). [09:18:04] ah hello bene2k1 [09:18:17] yes, that tool is a bit out of date, it would be nice if someone could rescue it [09:18:40] in the meantime though, your best bet is to find a converter tool (or tweak an existing one) that converts the xml files to sql [09:18:58] and writes out remaining sql tables; then import those and the other sql tables into your database directly [09:19:14] this is much faster than using mediawiki's import mechanisms [09:20:06] one thing you can do (and I hope you are doing it) to cut down on import time, is to use only the current revisions of articles [09:20:19] and also use only the articles/templates dump, not the 'everything and the kitchen sink' dump [09:23:49] Thanks apergos. I used the articles/template dump, but importing only the current revision seems like a good idea [09:24:33] 👍 [16:03:31] Hello, I need some help with the Wikibase Client in Lua. Trying to get some statement based on their qualifiers and rank in Wikidata. http://codepad.org/McGQtXbt [17:00:34] hauskatze, ad T216406, maybe you can review&merge https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/WikimediaMessages/+/520274 now, and I'll do the rest during tomorrow EU SWAT? [17:00:35] T216406: Rename `Image-reviewer` to `image-reviewer`, then migrate all its members - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216406 [17:01:15] I'll take a look Urbanecm - did you got my email reply fwiw? [17:01:29] yes, i got it hauskatze [17:02:03] ok - I wasn't sure I sent it to the right address [17:03:05] * Urbanecm didn't know freenode have email memo notifications [17:06:32] Urbanecm: yup, you can have it mailed, appart from them being displayed when logging-in [17:06:35] /ms help [17:07:07] hauskatze, memoserv just said you read my memo :D [17:07:21] Urbanecm: I just did from MemoServ :) [17:07:25] aha :) [17:08:34] /msg NickServ SET EMAILMEMOS ON <-- to turn on freenode emailing memos to your registered email [17:08:48] thanks :) [17:35:30] Urbanecm: 520274 is being merged after Raimond's +1 [17:35:39] thanks hauskatze [17:35:48] will do the rest during tomorrow EU SWAT [17:35:56] thanks a bunch [17:36:04] I can finally see that task closed [17:36:08] hauskatze, want to upload the rest of patches, or should I do it? [17:36:24] as you wish [17:37:03] going to upload them then [17:37:45] ok - I'll finish some paperwork in the meanwhile [17:37:55] ok :) [17:45:25] hauskatze, done, uploaded https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/mediawiki-config/+/520283 and https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/WikimediaMessages/+/520285 (the cherry pick) [17:46:20] Urbanecm: can you +2 on wmf/* branches? [17:46:29] or do you need me to do that tomorrow? [17:46:49] hauskatze, yup, I can +2 on wmf/*. BTW, you shouldn't be able to do it unless you're a deployer [17:47:15] that's right [17:47:21] perfect then [17:48:34] hauskatze, do you need anything else to be SWATted? :-) [17:49:53] I could use a SWIFT transfer of some money but I don't think I have anything for SWAT a.t.m. [17:50:20] maybe Tulsi's patch of today re. pa.wiki namespaces [17:50:22] ;) [17:50:53] ok! [17:54:54] hauskatze, can you please have a look at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter and find if they have any filters looking for image-reviewer? [17:55:15] if so, I'd need somebody to fix the filters [17:55:28] (ideally close to the change) [17:56:05] Urbanecm: they have tons of filters, maybe Reedy can run a query? Otherwise I'll revert the MW change until we can identify all potential filters that need to be changed before [17:56:33] hauskatze, there should be a query field on-wiki [17:56:52] (if you have abusefilter-modify) [17:57:19] (which you should have, as a steward) [17:58:06] 4 filters [17:58:24] not much [17:58:32] hauskatze, when would you be available to change them? [17:58:47] is Morning SWAT more suitable for you? I can do it in both windows, so up to you [17:59:20] I don't think I should be modifying commons filters but I have steward colleagues which are commons admins that could do it for me [17:59:43] wouldn't call it an issue given it's a change that doesn't really change anything [18:00:10] anyway, let me know which time would be more suitable, to minimalize "filter outage" [18:04:38] James_F: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216406#5301235 ? [18:06:31] hauskatze: Tsk. You should have pinged Jdforrester-PERSONAL. ;-) But sure. [18:06:46] thanks, James_F [18:06:51] I wasn't sure if you used that account [18:06:56] (or James_F-PERSONAL? :D) [18:06:56] * hauskatze ammends [18:07:31] fixed [18:07:44] * James_F tries not to cross the steams. [18:07:55] James_F: for now it'd be good if it could support both [Ii]mage-reviewer [18:08:16] after the SWAT, we can get rid of the uppercase one I think [18:09:20] Do we want to rename the Tag? [18:09:25] I guess we can do that later. [18:09:59] which tag James_F? [18:10:23] "License review by non-Image-reviewers". [18:10:28] For filter 70. [18:10:48] "You may not view details of this filter, because it is hidden from public view." [18:11:00] Sorry. :-) [18:11:07] :o [18:11:13] hauskatze: All thrre filters renamed. [18:11:19] s/renamed/fixed/ [18:11:19] hauskatze o/ [18:11:56] Bsadowski1: o/ [18:12:02] James_F: thanks :) [18:12:08] we can do the tag tomorrow I guess [18:12:24] I am even crossing my foot fingers so nothing breaks tomorrow :) [18:14:09] * Urbanecm too [18:17:58] Urbanecm: the wmf-config patch, is it possible to target commons only for now? [18:18:14] apparently other wikis use it too but I'm not prepared to do several changes at once [18:20:10] hauskatze, sure, I just did a find and replace [18:20:11] changing [18:21:53] hauskatze, I'm afraid we need to re-add the uppercase version to WikimediaMessages [18:22:05] otherwise, the other wikis won't know what's the name of the group [18:22:08] Urbanecm: Or just fix arwiki fast. ;-) [18:22:17] fawiki [18:22:23] Oh, sorry. [18:22:27] :) [18:22:28] Right script, wrong language. [18:22:36] was going to ask what's wrong with arwiki in this context [18:22:37] Urbanecm: no issues, I can revert the WMMessages [18:22:45] And yes, keep the old messages as well as the new ones. [18:22:52] I didn't mean a revert hauskatze, just keep old messages [18:23:12] will upload a patch in a min [18:23:16] ok [18:23:25] * hauskatze is getting nervous :) [18:24:27] James_F: in the meanwhile is https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/mediawiki/extensions/OATHAuth/+/520277/ right? [18:27:12] hauskatze, https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/mediawiki/extensions/WikimediaMessages/+/520291 [18:27:21] hauskatze, and also see new version of the config patch [18:27:32] hauskatze: Oh, sorry, thought I'd C+2'ed. [18:28:42] Urbanecm: shall I wait for a PS2 then? [18:28:45] James_F: no worries [18:28:58] & thanks [18:29:57] hauskatze, sorry for the confusion. I've uploaded a new PS to https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/mediawiki-config/+/520283 (PS3 actually) and a whole new patch https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/WikimediaMessages/+/520291 (which should be ready in PS1, unless you find mistakes) [18:32:49] or jerkins... [18:33:06] Urbanecm: alright. However the WikimediaMessages patch seems to have renamed image to Image, without adding the old keys back [18:33:26] looking [18:33:56] I mean, it looks like a revert [18:34:05] but perhaps I am wrong [18:34:12] it's a partial revert [18:34:30] it reverts everything except i18n/wikimedia/en.json and i18n/wikimedia/qqq.json [18:34:57] and adds Image-reviewer keys back to en.json and qqq.json [18:35:12] ah, right - that's why jenkins complains [18:35:26] can you explain why jenkins complains? [18:35:28] didn't figure it out yet [18:35:32] banana checker [18:35:42] missing en/qqq [18:35:50] missing? [18:35:53] if you add a en.json but not a qqq.json entry or vice-versa [18:36:06] ah, forgot to add a key to qqq.json [18:36:07] doing... [18:37:18] hauskatze, fixed [18:37:23] (hopefully) [18:39:59] James_F: re. CN: look for 27 June 2019 13:24 on CentralNotice Logs [18:40:08] I'm not sure how to link for stuff there [18:40:25] it's all javascript:toggleLogDisplay('40438') [18:40:30] :-/ [18:41:28] Urbanecm: so https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/operations/mediawiki-config/+/520283/ is just commons now right? [18:41:41] but we're keeping Image-reviewer for fawiki compat? [18:41:50] hauskatze, commons and testcommons [18:42:02] testcommons don't worry me much ;-) [18:42:06] yeah [18:42:09] that's why I kept it [18:42:27] we can do both commons tomorrow [18:42:38] yup [18:42:42] I mean, is there anything that needs migration over there? [18:43:21] hauskatze, there's nobody in Image-reviewer there [18:43:59] and also no filters that mentions that group [18:44:01] so safe to do there [18:44:12] hauskatze: Oh, I see, you have to expand the group to see the breakage. [18:44:46] ok, jenkins approved my WikimediaMessages change [18:44:46] I am doing a screenshot if you still need some more info James_F [18:44:55] hauskatze: Nah, I've C+2'e. [18:45:04] awesome, thanks :) [18:45:07] * hauskatze gone for dinner [18:46:01] James_F, would you be so kind to +2 https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/WikimediaMessages/+/520291 :)? [18:46:18] having both keys is important to not break fawiki [18:47:36] Urbanecm: Don't you want to duplicate rather than rename? [18:48:02] hmm, that's probably a good idea to save work from translators. [18:48:04] Urbanecm: Otherwise all languages other than English will be broken until wmf.13 rolls out in 9 days' time. [18:48:14] (And we'll need a full scap, lame.) [18:48:52] hmm, is it possible to deploy that two patches before wmf.13? [18:48:59] (i.e. backport i18n change?) [18:52:10] Urbanecm: Sure, but that'll need a full scap (to rebuild the i18n caches). [18:52:25] Which is "fine" but should be done rarely. [18:52:45] Not least because it takes ~45 minutes during which no deploys can happen. [18:53:42] wondering what's the correct thing to do... [18:53:53] probably wait for train with all the stuff [18:54:05] Losing momentum is bad, too [18:54:12] wdym? [19:24:27] James_F, can you have a look at the patch now please? [21:47:13] Urbanecm: I was thinking that maybe it is not needed to re-add back Image-reviewer to Wikimedia messages [21:47:28] at worst, a temporary redirect on fawiki to avoid a red link would be required [21:47:45] what about a group name hauskatze ? [21:47:48] *the [21:48:29] also, i'll probably wait for train, given localisation changes would require a full scap [21:48:31] #redirect locally until we can find time to do the fawiki one [21:48:59] might be a solution [21:49:05] let me check something [21:49:11] sure [21:49:38] anyway, it's merged now, you'll be easily able to remove that after we'll be done [21:51:18] oh, so the patch is merged already? then no issues :) [21:52:40] good :) [21:54:30] also, i'll probably wait for train, given localisation changes would require a full scap <-- full scap == headshot :) [21:55:10] probably not something that can't wait 9 days, right? [21:55:12] hauskatze, [21:55:45] no urgency at all [21:55:56] so, we ain't doing the commons thing tomorrow right? [21:56:00] just to be clear [21:56:04] looks so :) [21:56:17] perfect then [21:56:44] also unless i'm missing something, it's something that can be done at any time, without further prep, at least for commons, right? [22:03:31] Now that both Image-reviewer and image-reviewer exist, I think so yes [22:03:41] on WikimediaMessages I mean [22:06:16] cool