[10:21:49] <Kozuch>	 Hi, can someone look into this please? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module_talk:Mapframe#Too_few_points_returned_when_using_Wikidata
[16:50:54] <ToBeFree>	 what is this https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T226271
[17:12:25] <AntiComposite>	 It's the thumbnailer being broken.
[17:15:54] <ToBeFree>	 AntiComposite: I also wonder where the image comes from, as a reverse search does yield results but none on Commons
[19:25:36] <Krinkle>	 ToBeFree: May've been a deleted image
[19:25:54] <Krinkle>	 but given it's scaled down, I can't use a sha1 based lookup in the deleted image revisions, either.
[19:26:00] <Krinkle>	 as it will be different for each resize
[19:28:05] <JJMC89[m]>	 Don't know what's going on with that file. Can't seem to restore or upload a new version though - DB transaction times out.
[19:28:29] <Krinkle>	 JJMC89[m]: whats the exception ID?
[19:29:57] <JJMC89[m]>	 Krinkle: XQ0wCwpAADoAAA7CgmcAAABM
[19:29:59] <JJMC89[m]>	 [XQ0wCwpAADoAAA7CgmcAAABM] 2019-06-21 19:29:29: Fatal exception of type "Wikimedia\Rdbms\DBTransactionSizeError"
[19:30:10] <JJMC89[m]>	 was for a restore
[19:32:50] <Krinkle>	 ... that's enwiki
[19:33:32] <apergos>	 like change the stop opacity from stop-opacity:0.3137255 to stop-opacity:0.3137254 in the one line or someting
[19:33:44] <apergos>	 oops I accidentally'd the previous line
[19:33:57] <JJMC89[m]>	 Yes its enwiki
[19:34:00] <apergos>	 can't you just upload a new slightly tweaked version of the svg to force a rerender?
[19:34:15] <JJMC89[m]>	 I got the file there now by uploading at another title and then moving it
[19:34:16] <Krinkle>	 A purge would've likely fixed it as well
[19:34:20] <Krinkle>	 I want to know how it got there in the first place
[19:34:37] <apergos>	 well that would be nice, sure
[19:34:39] <Krinkle>	 When i said it wasn't overridden or deleted ever, that was about commons
[19:34:44] <Krinkle>	 Let me adjust for enwiki
[19:35:51] <Krinkle>	 JJMC89[m]: Wait so what did you do exactly
[19:36:13] <Krinkle>	 you deleted the page fully, then tried to restore which failed, then then a normal upload/page create.
[19:37:40] <JJMC89[m]>	 Deleted it. Then tried to restore, which failed. Then tried a new upload, which failed. Then uploaded to a new title, which succeeded. Then moved to the the original title.
[19:38:50] <Krinkle>	 oh
[19:38:55] <Krinkle>	 ok
[19:39:41] <JJMC89[m]>	 Still don't know how the face got there though
[19:39:58] <Krinkle>	 Could you delete this and try to restore the original upload log instead?
[19:40:19] <Krinkle>	 Might take a few tries, but afaik this error isn't deterministic, it's time based so sometimes it's just too slow and we recently made it more strict to abort slow ones
[19:40:55] <JJMC89[m]>	 I tried to restore it multiple times before. Got the same error each time.
[19:41:04] <Krinkle>	 hm.. ok.
[19:41:14] <Krinkle>	 the transaction time limit should probably be raised for undelete
[19:41:19] <Krinkle>	 the undelete system is really slow
[19:41:29] <Krinkle>	 it needs a lot of love to become faster unfortunately, its really old 
[19:41:40] <Krinkle>	 it's only got like 3 revisions
[19:41:51] <Krinkle>	 undelete for files*
[19:42:01] <JJMC89[m]>	 Yes, I run into the issue frequently with other restores. It usually succeeds on a second try though.
[19:42:38] <Krinkle>	 yeah, page and edit revision system is much faster and relatively new by comparison
[19:46:45] <JJMC89[m]>	 Its taking about 4.15s, which is over the 3s limit
[19:48:44] <Krinkle>	 yep
[19:48:54] <Krinkle>	 how do you see that though
[19:48:59] <Krinkle>	 does it say on the error page?
[19:49:35] <JJMC89[m]>	 It says "To avoid creating high replication lag, this transaction was aborted because the write duration (4.3262491226196) exceeded the 3 second limit. If you are changing many items at once, try doing multiple smaller operations instead." above the exception.
[19:50:29] <Krinkle>	 interesting, I didn't know we added a UI for that. cool :)
[19:50:47] <Krinkle>	 I thought it would just tell you Internal error x12312312313 and then "MWException" or some such
[19:52:07] <JJMC89[m]>	 <h1> is Database error. Then the message I just quoted. Then the exception in a red box.
[19:52:27] <Krinkle>	 ah, right, we do both for this one
[19:52:29] <Krinkle>	 That's nice
[19:52:41] <Krinkle>	 I mean, it's not particularly useful to you, but at least you have an idea of what's up
[19:52:58] <Krinkle>	 and what the chances might be of getting it below 3.0 s
[19:53:02] <Krinkle>	 like if it's almost there
[19:53:04] <Krinkle>	 :D