[02:43:08] <argenton>	  I'm looking the massages at Wikimdia Commons Help desk and 3 or 4 contributors reported that they failed their upload do to "Internal error: Server failed to store temporary file."
[02:43:09] <argenton>	 Did you know somenthing about that?
[03:12:04] <argenton>	 I'm looking the massages at Wikimdia Commons Help desk and 3 or 4 contributors reported that they failed their upload do to "Internal error: Server failed to store temporary file." [23:43] <argenton> Did you know somenthing about that?
[03:13:43] <p858snake>	 i would recommend filing a task in phabricator, especially since its the weekend as well (or friday for some parts still)
[03:22:13] <argenton>	 <p858snake> thanks
[08:20:03] <ankry>	 hi
[08:20:25] <ankry>	 is the number of namespace aliases limited in Mediawiki?
[08:20:44] <ankry>	 can it be ~50 for one namespace?
[08:22:18] <ankry>	 The problem is "Author" namespace in sourceswiki which according to rules could be in any of content languages used there
[08:23:45] <ankry>	 And I think it would be better to use aliases than create pages in main namespace
[08:24:08] <ankry>	 any hints?
[08:25:49] <RhinosF1>	 Ankry, no limit is shown on https://m.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgNamespaceAliases
[08:29:59] <ankry>	 RhinosF1: OK, thx
[08:31:30] <ankry>	 RhinosF1: am I right thinking that if we have "Autor", "Auteur", "Autoro", etc as aliases for "Author" we will be able to use theese prefixes in {{DISPLAYTITLE}} ?
[08:34:20] <RhinosF1>	 Ankry, I've never tried it
[09:11:32] <closedmouth>	 ankry: you might want to try asking in #mediawiki
[16:13:53] <Krinkle>	 James_F: might be of interest - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T223007
[18:40:30] <McJill>	 Curious: is there a scenario whre wgRestrictionEdit or Move would contain more than one string?
[18:41:45] <Platonides>	 wgRestrictionEdit is not a configuration variable
[18:44:20] <McJill>	 So… no?
[18:46:27] <Platonides>	 so I don't know what you are asking, actually
[18:46:39] <Platonides>	 although strictly it would be a no
[18:46:45] <Platonides>	 you probably had something in mind
[18:48:11] <McJill>	 Sorry!  Basically, why is wgRestrictionEdit an array?  It holds explicit protection levels, doesn’t interact with flaggedrevs, and wgRestrictionMove is separate
[18:49:57] <Platonides>	 I don't see $wgRestrictionEdit as a configuration value...
[18:50:26] <McJill>	 mw.config.get(‘wgRestrictionEdit')
[18:50:35] <Platonides>	 ok
[18:50:38] <McJill>	 (but without the stupid smart quotes)
[18:50:48] <Platonides>	 heh, sure
[18:52:44] <Platonides>	 on which version are you seeing it?
[18:55:27] <Platonides>	 ah, it is created on OutputPage dynamically
[18:55:37] <Platonides>	 all the wgRestrictionXXX rights
[18:55:42] <Platonides>	 wgRestrictionCreate, wgRestrictionEdit, wgRestrictionMove, wgRestrictionUpload
[18:58:06] <McJill>	 Maybe upload could have multiple items?
[19:10:38] <Krenair>	 seems to come from Title::getRestrictions
[19:13:42] <Krenair>	 ProtectionForm has a
[19:13:44] <Krenair>	                         // @todo FIXME: This form currently requires individual selections,
[19:13:44] <Krenair>	                         // but the db allows multiples separated by commas.
[19:13:59] <Krenair>	 there is some support for an old format of protection in the code too
[19:15:59] <McJill>	 intriguing!
[19:16:42] <McJill>	 That makes sense, even if unused
[19:17:30] <McJill>	 Thanks for taking a look
[19:17:38] <Krenair>	 Title::getRestrictions has this
[19:17:41] <Krenair>	          * @return array Restriction levels needed to take the action. All levels are
[19:17:41] <Krenair>	          *     required. Note that restriction levels are normally user rights, but 'sysop'
[19:17:41] <Krenair>	          *     and 'autoconfirmed' are also allowed for backwards compatibility. These should
[19:17:41] <Krenair>	          *     be mapped to 'editprotected' and 'editsemiprotected' respectively.
[19:18:45] <Platonides>	 so, you could have a protection that requires multiple rights
[19:19:03] <Krenair>	 theoretically, I think right now to get that you'd need someone to intervene in the database
[19:21:32] <McJill>	 I can imagine a much more complex universe with parallel groups/perms
[19:21:53] <Krenair>	 try not to give anyone any ideas
[19:21:57] <McJill>	 :D
[19:22:28] <Krenair>	 WP:DEVBEANS applies
[19:24:25] * McJill tosses a [0] behind wgRestrictionEdit, calls it a day
[19:24:30] <Krenair>	 McJill, I looked through the enwiki DB and it seems nothing uses more than one right now
[19:24:38] <McJill>	 Danke
[19:24:45] <Krenair>	 you might want something that completely breaks if length > 1
[19:25:02] <Krenair>	 rather than silently misbehaving if the situation changes at some point
[19:25:20] <McJill>	 👍