tag [10:48:36] WHICH should not even be in the final output [10:49:02] Something is broken in the parser if it's not properly stripping this out [11:01:51] Is the place to ask about using semanticmediawiki and how it works? [11:03:46] siers: Doesn't is have it's own chatroom? [11:04:01] I'll find out [11:04:15] it does! :) [11:06:29] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216350 [11:20:12] siers: Not really, this channel is supposed to be for wikimedia specific stuff, and wikimedia does not use SMW. You can ask at #semanticmediawiki . There is also a channel #mediawiki for mediawiki in general, including external usage [11:20:27] ah [11:21:33] That said, nobody is going to be mad about asking here, its just you're more likely to get a relavent answer in other places [12:21:35] Could someone checked I've filed a phab properly (link on the way). [12:22:02] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216352 ^^ [12:24:53] rhinosf1: Is that diff right? [12:25:04] I don't see any headers moving in that diff [12:25:57] Although not a requirement, having minimal steps to reproduce can make it more likely the bug will be fixed quickly [12:26:48] Corrected the diff Bawolff [12:26:51] (minimal steps to reproduce means something like: "1. Create a wikipage with this wikitext. 2. hover over link. Notice how it doesn't work where instead i expect it should") [12:27:44] I can add reproduce steps in a second. [12:28:02] IRCCLOUD Is also working again [12:30:33] Bawolff - Added steps to reproduce [12:31:02] lgtm [12:32:19] Thanks [14:33:28] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216357 The random bugs in phan-taint-check sure are head-scratchers [15:55:30] bawolff: what's "double escape false positive"? [15:56:51] shreyasminocha: For phan-taint-check - the tool is supposed to detect if someone does something like htmlspecialchars( htmlspecialchars( $foo ) ); Since then something that's supposed to be a " will show up as " to user [15:57:21] Its a false positive because the tool is saying somebody did htmlspecialchar's twice, despite that clearly not being the case [15:57:52] And the triggering condition makes even less sense, as it seems to depend on having a statement where the return value is just thrown away [15:57:58] So something is super buggy [15:58:17] ooh okay. thanks for the explanation [16:27:15] Okay what does it take to get something Actually fixed? [16:27:16] https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:January_1916_QST.djvu/11 [16:27:33] Here the issue seems to pedanticalyl specfic whitespace handling [17:34:58] Hi [17:35:00] Anyone in? [23:46:47] Could somebody kill all my connections to tools.labsdb? User: u2815