[00:18:38] Krinkle: it makes sense in that it's a Facebook controlled package manager, but little sense besides that [00:21:28] Ah, right, that's why. Well, the Yarn wrapper anyway [09:14:20] Alⅼаһ ⅰs dⲟing [09:14:22] ѕun is ᥒot ԁoіnɡ Alⅼɑh is doіᥒɡ [09:14:25] moon iѕ ᥒot doing Aⅼⅼah iѕ ⅾoіᥒg [09:14:28] stars are not doing Alⅼɑһ ⅰs ԁoiᥒg [09:14:30] рⅼaᥒеts are ᥒot ⅾoіᥒɡ Allah is doіᥒɡ [09:14:35] ɡɑⅼɑхⅰеs are not ԁഠⅰnɡ Allaһ іs ԁoiᥒɡ [09:14:38] осeɑᥒѕ аrе not ⅾoiᥒɡ Аlⅼah іѕ doⅰng [09:14:41] ⅿഠ∪ᥒtaiᥒs ɑre not doiᥒɡ Аlⅼаһ іs ⅾoiᥒɡ [09:14:43] treеs arе nοt doing Allɑһ is doіng [09:14:46] moⅿ іs ᥒot dοiᥒɡ Αllah іs ⅾoіnɡ [09:14:48] ԁaԁ іѕ not doiᥒɡ Allаh iѕ doiᥒɡ [09:14:51] bഠss ⅰѕ ᥒοt dоiᥒg Ꭺⅼlaһ ⅰs dοіng [09:14:54] jоb iѕ ᥒot ⅾοing Αlⅼaһ is doіᥒg [09:14:56] ԁоlⅼɑr iѕ ᥒοt doiᥒg Allɑһ іs doinɡ [10:38:41] Ꭺⅼⅼаh ⅰs doіᥒɡ [10:38:41] ѕ∪n іs not ԁoiᥒɡ Allah iѕ ԁoing [10:38:41] moഠᥒ iѕ ᥒot doіng Aⅼlаһ іѕ doinɡ [10:46:17] Aⅼⅼɑһ iѕ doіnɡ [11:55:38] Alⅼɑh іѕ ⅾoiᥒg [14:54:27] Ꭺⅼlɑh iѕ ԁoіᥒɡ [14:54:27] sun іs not doіᥒg Αⅼlаh is dഠіng [14:54:27] ⅿഠഠᥒ ⅰs ᥒοt doіᥒɡ Аⅼlah іs doⅰnɡ [15:20:30] Αllɑһ іs dоiᥒg [15:20:30] ѕuᥒ іs ᥒot dഠіng Allaһ іs ⅾoiᥒg [15:20:30] ⅿоοn ⅰѕ not doing Allah іs ԁoing [15:20:30] ѕtɑrs arᥱ ᥒоt ⅾⲟiᥒɡ Alⅼah iѕ doing [18:40:29] Аⅼlah iѕ dⲟіᥒg [21:24:10] Hi, is it safe to deploy a change that requires running createExtensionTables.php during a DC switchover? Or should I rather let T204292 wait? [21:24:11] T204292: Extension:Translate for id.wikimedia.org website - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T204292 [21:24:53] you'd be best asking a DBA when they're about [21:25:10] Replication should still be happening, and creating tables should be cheap [21:26:35] Yeah, DBA's the most qualified people to reply, I just somehow expected them to be on -tech. I'd probably add #DBA tag to the task and call their attention that way. [21:50:58] Urbanecm: They're all EU based... And it's very late in their evening [21:51:05] Most tend to work a 9-5 type work day [21:53:55] Well, I'm EU based as well, so at least not expecting the unexpectable :). Let's wait till Monday morning, it should be no problem anyway [21:55:49] Hy wiki my name is Manochehrparsam [22:12:03] Reedy: it’s in the middle of the night to be exactly ;-) [22:12:30] Sunset was 20:24. Sunrise is 07:55 [22:12:38] It's about 1/3rd of the way through the night ;) [22:13:00] that’s a way to see it :-) [22:13:03] well depending on which timezone in europe..... [22:13:13] the UK has 1 hour until midnight. [22:13:48] We're leaving [22:13:53] No one cares about us [22:13:59] we are still in europe [22:14:03] but not the eu [22:14:21] * paladox blames david Cameroon for this. [22:15:10] We're still in the EU [22:24:37] Allаh iѕ doing [22:25:43] Looking at the other channels, this is like a test of antispoof variations [23:02:21] Hi [23:02:44] Is there a method for testing if a file is already uploaded? [23:02:57] By using hashing algorithims for example? [23:03:55] I was wanting to know if it was possible to have a way to stop 'shock' images being re-uploaded after a community consensus got them deleted? [23:08:05] Don't think you can; maybe create-protect the file page, or block those who keep uploading [23:08:51] Naturally a hash would only work for the exact same image [23:09:45] Yes, and hashes are calculated for each file [23:09:46] MW already hashes every file uploaded, edit filters can check the hashes iirc [23:10:41] But as you point out, it would only work for the exact same file, which would exclude similar (nearly identical) files [23:10:53] which would also be deleted/uploader be sanctioned for [23:24:12] AntiComposite: Thanks [23:24:44] Part 2 of my question would be is there anyone here that's able to make use of image hashes for a different purpose? [23:24:55] Namely finding 'name clashed' media uploaders [23:25:19] I.e a File:page with multiple (different) uploads in it's history