[01:05:14] Could someone please block this guy, Vvjjkkii? [01:05:33] on phabricator [01:10:11] Any Phabricator admins around to block Vvjjkkii? [01:10:44] it's the weekend [01:10:50] i've created https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T198547 [01:11:34] paladox: Didn't take long for that to be vandalized [01:11:40] yeh [01:11:46] and they swore at me. [01:12:31] on the bright side, at least he doesn't seem to be a bot? [01:14:15] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/people/query/Df0Mt44LIdkZ/#R is the list, so if you see 'em... [01:15:47] bd808 legoktm greg-g: Please block Vvjjkkii on phabricator [01:15:59] Some one got em [01:16:10] mys_721tx: did it just a few seconds ago [01:16:19] bd808: Thanks! [01:16:31] Thanks bd808 [01:16:35] now we wait for the flood of emails :D [01:16:38] I'll email andre about cleanup :( [01:17:19] Is there a script for it? If not, I'll get started. [01:17:35] JJMC89: its all manual I'm afraid [01:18:24] That's what I though [01:18:29] *thought [01:19:15] I'm headed out to dinner, but Krenair knows how to poke me if there is an emergency [01:46:19] Recent activity is still catching up or he's still going... I suspect it's the former. [01:46:36] The former [01:46:37] it's just the job queue processing still going [01:49:52] Blerg... [01:51:40] Awe too slow. [01:51:45] Lol [01:52:34] Lol oh dear... [02:27:18] Hi, not sure where to ask. Can someone with extended phabricator privileges please nuke all edits made by this user? https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/Vvjjkkii/ [02:27:33] Nope. [02:27:37] ToBeCloud: Yeah, has to be done manually. [02:27:52] Get out the mop and bucket [02:27:55] okay- will do if you tell me how [02:27:58] I will actually do this [02:28:06] I'm a mop guy. :) [02:28:27] ...if there is ANY way to do it except guessing the previous value. [02:28:27] I've been manually reverting the settings, not sure that's the most effective way. [02:28:35] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T195423#4342804 In each task, it tells you what they did. Remove what they added, re-add what they removed. [02:28:56] By the way, oldest: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/feed/?userPHIDs=PHID-USER-4f6g67fxmrb2t5z7dzky&after=6573047788356273019 (so you don't have to do what I did and click through ten pages) [02:29:11] sigh, time for a new phabricator feature request :) Okay, I'll see what I can do [02:29:23] There's already multiple tasks for a rollback feature. [02:29:25] oh! [02:29:57] But phab really isn't built for that [02:30:01] And upstream "doesn't really many examples of abuse in the wild" [02:30:25] 'Cause no one deals with abuse like WMF projects [02:31:31] "Currently, abuse cases are largely hypothetical: we have seen little real abuse in the wild." - https://secure.phabricator.com/T10215 [02:32:05] Wikimedia LTAs: Making your hypothetical abuse cases real since 2001 [02:35:31] what are they in for anyway? [02:35:53] I mean it's probably very time consuming to do all that [02:36:10] unless they are doing it automatically [02:36:18] don't make them write a bot :P [02:36:28] (one done https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T198150 hope this is correct) [02:36:36] the description diff is especially tricky [02:36:42] the formatting is probably not always easy to undo [02:36:51] any trick for that? [02:37:12] show details of description change [02:37:14] click old tab [02:37:16] copy+paste [02:37:32] oooooh the "old" tab [02:37:37] thanks :) and hi Krenair ^.^ [02:37:52] yeah learnt that one myself earlier today lol [02:38:05] Wait, I failed: [02:38:10] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T198114 [02:38:57] you tried [02:39:03] anyway worked for me [02:39:14] Firefox? [02:39:55] I mean, @Krenair, I could switch to Chrome, if that's what you used and what works [02:40:16] I used chrome [02:40:20] switching [02:40:27] would test on FF but something else just came up [02:40:57] oh, I see the problem. The backticks had been broken, possibly by myself, causing the indentation to be interpreted differently [02:41:50] to me it just looked like missing linebreaks [02:41:51] but ok [02:43:21] (you might be right of course) --- I guess this is how reverting vandalism felt in the early days of Wikipedia/Nupedia/whatever [02:44:07] They at least had old revisions that could be restored [02:47:43] 11:36:11 unless they are doing it automatically [02:47:50] I’m pretty sure they’re doing it automatically [02:49:42] they were up for about 15 minutes I think [02:49:54] I have about 300 emails [02:50:08] 300 edits over 900 seconds [02:50:08] same here [02:50:12] definitely automated [02:50:40] there's no way someone fills out that phabricator form with that kind of junk in three seconds and saves [02:51:05] in fact I'm kind of surprised you can achieve that with tooling [02:52:47] Some browser-based script maybe? [02:53:18] Yeah. [02:54:57] theeeenn [02:55:02] I wonder why it doesn't persist [02:55:22] I guess we're lucky someone lost their fun? [02:55:46] Got locked by a phab admin. [02:56:25] Wonder if it's connected with the other goings-on. [02:56:28] Probably is. [02:57:07] AntiComposite: is there something larger happening? [02:59:04] labs-ns0 CPU usage spiked and it crashed [02:59:46] not network though and there's an existing ticket for that server having that problem - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T196252 [02:59:52] so likely unrelated [03:05:39] How can I close something as a duplicate? https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T198053 [03:06:02] Edit Related Tasks... [03:06:06] Close As Duplicate [03:06:12] it's a dropdown [03:06:15] kind of [03:06:33] Thanks, took me a moment to find what you meant :) [03:21:48] I have a "solution" for a mass rollback [03:21:51] nobody will like it [03:21:55] database backup restore [03:22:05] Not a solution. [03:29:23] that's the nuclear option [03:30:17] And hardly in a figurative sense [03:34:32] the data center would undergo nuclear fission if we restore the database? [03:35:03] Any way to quick roll back a vandal edit on Phabricator? The Huggle project got hit as well [03:35:16] Sorry, nope. All manual. [03:35:45] Damn, well, I'll do it later if someone else doesn't [03:36:22] Need a ClueBot for Phab ;) [03:36:32] Need a lot of things for Phab [03:36:39] I'm sorry, but is there really no way to ban this person already? [03:36:45] They are banned [03:36:49] It still continues and continues and continues and continues. [03:36:58] No they aren’t, they are making actions still. [03:37:02] That's the job queue catching up with them [03:37:08] oh my god [03:37:10] Ah. [03:37:13] seriously [03:37:16] they are very [03:37:16] very [03:37:18] very much banned [03:37:20] they are gone [03:37:20] RIP [03:37:22] disabled [03:37:28] how many times do we have to do this conversation [03:37:51] Approximately once every 3 seconds [03:38:11] Well, I'm sorry, but how to not get annoyed when emails keep coming and coming from this person. [03:38:48] This shouldn't be happening, this happens not for the first time, it's unfortunate that you have to listen to our complaints but it's even more unfortunate that there's still no way to prevent this. [03:40:30] if people clicked the link in the email they can see when the action took place in phabricator [03:42:02] Are you expecting me to click the links from each out of 7 spam emails from Phabricator? I'm very sorry for this situation, but your reaction is very misdirected. [03:42:27] no, just one before saying they're still going [03:43:27] and not just you [03:43:40] every single person who has been on here and said more or less the same thing tonight [03:45:36] Well, that just means that there should be measures preventing stuff like this. Not that you have to tell everyone ‘why don’t you know every technicality about Phab vandalism before going here’. Good luck. [04:19:34] Tech support ;) [04:19:34] I always hated it [04:19:35] * ToBeCloud ducks [04:19:42] 'night [05:11:41] heyhey. There's a vandal active again on phabricator it seems? [05:12:09] (disabled already, not yet reverted https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/Vvjjkkii/ ) [05:13:45] Yep. Reversions have to happen manually. You're welcome to help out. [05:23:06] 3,323 emails from the vandal ... :/ [05:39:03] the recovery efforts will generate as many emails though :( [05:39:28] manually?! [05:40:08] as this vandalism seems to get more popular, it sounds like an excellent time to make that a little easier... :o [05:42:55] musikanimal: Are you going to be our hero? [05:43:10] I am very close! [05:43:19] Awesome! [12:04:29] Hello! [12:04:35] hi [12:04:49] Can somebody help me to restore my Phabricator tasks? [12:05:33] (after this huge vandalism) [12:07:16] I think there's a bot going round trying to restore them now [12:07:58] Oh. [12:08:39] I am just suprised that some of my tasks are not restored yet. [12:08:43] Then I wait. [12:08:54] we're talking about >1000 edits [12:09:26] although, not sure if the bot is running anymore... [12:09:28] musikanimal? [12:10:52] idle 5h [12:19:20] MAnimal probably stopped the bot while he is sleeping [12:19:22] I guess [13:38:10] Krenair: revi yes correct, it auto-shutoff 3 hours after I went to sleep as a safeguard. I figured it would have finished by then! [13:38:29] seems not [13:39:23] Shall I link the problematic ones? [13:39:35] (my tasks) [13:39:39] the bot is running again [13:40:15] it should get to those eventually [13:40:41] Thank you very much. :) [13:41:39] I won't get notification e-mails, right? [13:41:49] hmm that's a good question [13:41:58] it is editing as a legitimate bot now, so maybe you won't [13:42:56] Okay, thanks! [13:43:12] And I hope you can deal with there vandalism in the future. [13:50:24] I had to set up a filter to delete mails from CommunityTechBot and Community_Tech_Bot [13:50:27] so it probably sends one [13:51:43] and I've also set a filter to delete any emails containing `removed(@revi)`(thanks to "Send Stamps" settings on "Email format" settings [15:09:20] We have a problem on da.wikipedia with the patrol tool. Rollback edits are marked as unpatrolled thus the rollbacks are made by sysops or patrollers whom are autopatrolled [15:11:22] I found that on meta and was not sure if this is a bug [15:11:28] seems that's indeed a bug [15:11:41] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T198449 [15:11:46] wonderful [15:13:11] yep, it's a bug [15:13:14] regression [15:49:15] I wonder what happened to the search function lately. Now it doesn't suggest the results same way anymore when typing [15:50:08] how to restore status "closed as duplicate..." in phab? [15:50:47] ankry: you "Edit Related Tasks..." for that task. [15:51:31] andre__: seems it doeas not work if the task was already closed as duplicate [15:51:44] T? [15:51:49] and then vandalized [15:51:56] ankry: then what is "restoring" if it IS already a dup? [15:52:03] ankry, I don't know what you're asking for. [15:52:03] T196267 [15:52:04] T196267: CheckUser result shows various logs in the wiki interface language - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T196267 [15:52:26] ankry, as I said: "Edit Related Tasks..." [15:52:51] ankry: if that does not work, please explain why and how it does not work. [15:53:14] Trizek: ping? [15:54:05] ankry: I've handled it (again) [15:54:25] handling dups are confusing anyway [15:55:10] revi: thanks, it did not work for me [15:55:22] hmm, no problem [15:55:35] jest no efect after clicking "merge to..." [15:56:24] works for me [15:56:25] Was there anything under the "Close this task as a duplicate of" header? [15:56:34] maybe browser glitch [15:56:39] ankry, ostatnia opcja [15:58:30] musikanimal: I can make an explanation to the phab priority - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/source/operations-puppet/browse/production/modules/phabricator/data/fixed_settings.yaml$47 [15:59:42] yep! I just fixed it, andre__ pointed me to the mapping [15:59:44] but thank you :) [16:00:47] oh heh [16:00:51] great [16:08:34] wargo: wiem, jak się zamyka jako duplikat, gdy jeszcze w ten sposób zamknięty nie był; ale gdy już był zamknięty jako duplikat, a potem ktoś otworzył, to ta opcja nie działa. Przynajmniej z mojego konta. [16:09:43] wargo: po prostu klikam, a task pozostaje w niezmienionym stanie [16:09:55] Nie wyskakuje okienko? [16:16:14] wyskakuje okienko [16:16:36] ale jak wybiorę w okienku docelowy task i potwierdzę, to nie ma efektu [16:16:39] żadnego [16:17:34] chyb, że właściwą opcją zatwierdzającą jest w tym przypadku "Cancel" ;P (tej faktycznie nie próbowałem) [16:18:27] albo może jakieś specjalne uprawnienia trzeba mieć [16:18:35] revi'emu się udało [16:19:03] inna sprawa, ze jest on tym samym użytkownikiem, który zamykał jako duplikat poprzednio [16:19:08] może to ma znaczenie?