[04:52:33] So... I got my wikitech account a long time ago. [04:53:11] and my credential doesn't work on gerrit [04:53:27] Is there anything I am missing? [04:57:17] never mind, it's the underscore. [05:40:09] Is there a meeting [05:46:03] AlexZ,Last warning that you may lose your OverSight permission. [13:51:05] anybody from the release team around? [13:51:53] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki in the news tab it lists the release of 1.31.0 on 2017-06-13, the year was mistyped [13:53:34] should be changed on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:MediaWiki_News and that one is protected [14:00:17] akoopal: I'm not a member of releng, but fixed anyway :) [14:00:27] :-) [14:00:29] thanks [19:27:57] Did something related to firstHeading margins just got merged / pushed out? [19:28:13] Because the margins at the top here https://bs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nogometna_reprezentacija_Armenije don't look right. [19:28:21] They were fine until a few minutes ago. [19:38:32] strange... there appear to be two revisions with identical content that have different sha1s. (revid 53582 and 55213.) anyone know what could cause that? [19:39:25] YairRand: Are you sure they are indentical (including spaces and non-visible characters) [19:40:05] bawolff: It says "No difference" when I try to compare them [19:40:48] There could be something that the diff algorithm doesn't see as difference (Maybe two spaces in a row or something) [19:41:45] bawolff: just tested, the diff algorithm notices two spaces in a row as different [19:45:39] the thing I'm concerned about is, are the sha1s normally accurate? or maybe this one's just broken because of the age of the edits? [19:46:26] YairRand: one of these edits probably has multiple newlines at the end, which is not visible in the editor and when diffing [19:46:32] Its certainly a possibility [19:46:42] I guess we should recalculate the sha1 and see if they match [19:46:53] This is on enwiki? [19:47:05] there used to be some bugs that would cause that to happen. and it is still possible to create edits like this if you abuse subst: in a particular way [19:47:19] bawolff: yes, on enwiki [19:48:06] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ApiSandbox#action=query&format=json&prop=revisions&revids=53582%7C55213&rvprop=ids%7Ctimestamp%7Cflags%7Ccomment%7Cuser%7Ccontent [19:48:25] really? I would expect sha1 to be calculated on the revision text as stored [19:48:37] so actually, one of the edits is missing the final newline. that is not visible in the diff [19:49:11] 97f5a1c88106da46bf66ca3600a830fff3264ce1 index.php?action=raw&oldid=53582 [19:49:12] 4a20c020991e4ba7e024379d52fcd021a73f61d6 index.php?action=raw&oldid=55213 [19:49:18] So they are definitely different [19:49:20] they have different sha1s, and the text looks the same but actually differs by the newline [19:50:13] huh. mystery solved, I guess. that's a relief. thank you for your help. [19:50:22] One has a newline at the end of the page, one doesn't [19:50:37] oh, MatmaRex already said that [20:19:36] srdjan_m, which skin? [20:19:44] quiddity: vector [20:20:30] hmm, no changes that I know of. I'll see if I can find anything... [20:21:00] *just get changed [20:21:07] just saw that typo [20:21:48] Ah, I see what happened. [20:22:26] I added some CSS as a workaround for T178626, but after it got merged, I forgot to remove it. [20:22:26] T178626: #jump-to-nav margin elimination caused the indentation between the subtitle and the article content to disappear - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T178626 [20:22:33] :D [20:22:47] whoops... [21:30:37] /12/7