[10:32:37] https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Psl631#Can_somewone_change_the_content_model_on_my_user_page_to_"HTML"? [10:32:43] anyone know an answer for this? [10:33:08] he asked and i have no idea [10:56:01] Vermont: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ChangeContentModel/User:Psl631 HTML is not an option. [10:56:08] Thanks [10:56:20] Also, ask him for some medication for my eyes now. [12:27:23] What the policy of CC-BY-NC on ToolForge? I'm looking at some font with a similar license (Free to redistribute, No selling nor derivative) [12:29:30] Dispenser: #wikimedia-cloud [12:31:24] got it [15:26:22] Technical Advice IRC meeting starting in 30 minutes in channel #wikimedia-tech, hosts: @addshore & @Christoph_Jauera_(WMDE) - all questions welcome, more infos: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Advice_IRC_Meeting [15:52:35] oooooh [15:52:38] 8 mins left! [15:53:06] addshore: behave [15:53:13] 7!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [15:59:19] 1 [16:00:05] HELOOOO! And welcome to this weeks technical advice IRC meeting, with yours hosts CFisch_WMDE and I, here to help you out in any way we can (via IRC) [= [16:00:13] !!! [16:00:27] \o/ [16:00:45] Get the party started! [16:01:39] WOOOOOO [16:02:22] Shameless plugging, if anyone want to see how 200k video views on youtube translates to 15k article views https://addshore.com/2018/03/spike-in-adam-conover-wikipedia-page-views-wikiwhat-epsiode-4/ [16:02:52] * addshore wants to go and look at some other trending youtube videos and see if any visible pageview increase exists for their topics [16:05:08] ...like funny goat videos and the article about goats? [16:05:17] perhaps ;) [16:05:32] So, I have a vauge question.... [16:05:33] .... [16:06:10] You're here to answer, not ask! [16:06:17] I want to write a blog post comparing github PRs and gerrit change setrs and chains, and I want something that is easy to use for creating tree like diagrams (essentialy representing chains of commits) any thoughts? [16:06:18] Reedy: shhh [16:08:42] hmmm [16:08:51] no idea [16:08:57] well, i just had a scroll through https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1838873/visualizing-branch-topology-in-git?utm_medium=organic&utm_source=google_rich_qa&utm_campaign=google_rich_qa and found a bunch, I'll see which is best [16:25:56] addshore: Graphviz / dot? [16:26:25] I used it for the graphs in https://lucaswerkmeister.de/posts/2017/09/03/wikidata+dgsh/ [16:26:35] (you can append Makefile to that URL to peek behind the curtain ;) ) [16:27:52] ooh Lucas_WMDE that could be perfect! [16:38:56] Lucas_WMDE: YAY http://webgraphviz.com/ [16:39:14] heh, nice :D [16:40:20] Soo just to be sure... anyone I need for technical help around mediawiki and related projects? [16:40:39] addshore: apparently that runs in the browser, I can’t see any network requests… [16:40:49] emscripten or that sort of stuff, I guess? [16:40:55] (sorry CFisch_WMDE ^^ ) [16:41:03] No problem :-) [16:58:19] well, quite a quiet one! [17:12:28] and over already ^^ [17:18:53] ohh I forgot about it :( [22:42:40] hello, anyone home? [22:45:31] johnywhy_: Likely. [22:46:05] thx, too late to submit support question? [22:46:23] Don't ask to ask on IRC. [22:46:30] Just ask :) [22:50:50] I attempted a fix on an extension, but my fix did not seem to work. Any suggestions? Details: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T190343 [22:51:01] ConfirmAccount extension [22:51:53] I'd recommend to also ask in #wikimedia-dev which might be better suited but is also way noisier unfortunately [23:18:08] @andre__ no answer over there. Feel free to "just answer" :D [23:27:37] johnywhy_ I wonder why it is done this way [23:29:56] Platonides ? [23:30:15] me too [23:31:42] I think the goal is different [23:32:08] i'm listening [23:32:19] runAutoMaintenance() is called to automatically reject requests older than $wgRejectedAccountMaxAge [23:32:35] an account rejected manually should not need that [23:32:41] (as one would expect) [23:33:06] "pruning of old requests will not trigger often, so old rejected requests may persist." https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ConfirmAccount#Known_issues [23:34:16] it may simply mean that requests that should be considered rejected may be found there [23:36:17] rejected requests are no longer listed in "open requests" list. But same email cannot request again, until prune. Prune happens infrequently. [23:36:49] how are you testing this? [23:39:38] - install ConfirmAccounts. - Request an account. - Login as admin, and reject the request. Then logout. - Request against with same email. Receive "Username is already in use in a pending account request." [23:40:34] Then insert one line of code into function rejectRequest: ConfirmAccount::runAutoMaintenance(); [23:40:52] then test again, with a different email. Same error. [23:44:09] set a lower $wgRejectedAccountMaxAge [23:44:25] thx! will try it [23:44:28] # How long to store rejected requests [23:44:28] $wgRejectedAccountMaxAge = 7 * 24 * 3600; // 1 week [23:45:05] what I was talkign before was the similarly named $wgConfirmAccountRejectAge :P [23:45:42] these are in LocalSettings.php? Or in the extension php? [23:47:09] yes [23:47:15] you set those in LocalSettings.php [23:47:26] after loading ConfirmAccount [23:50:20] where did you find those switches? not listed on extension page [23:50:30] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ConfirmAccount [23:53:26] those switches are defined in ConfirmAccount.config.php. Is that a standard file for extensions? [23:54:35] I don't think so [23:54:41] it was created in 2011 [23:54:59] hmm [23:55:05] i mean extensionName.config.php [23:55:24] how do we know same switches in LocalSettings.php will override that file? [23:55:31] I see a few more extensions doing it: MwEmbedSupport, UploadWizard and TimedMediaHandler [23:56:25] thx for checking. TinyMCE doesn't. [23:56:58] I only found those 4 extensions doing it [23:57:15] out of ~520 [23:59:10] ok, so maybe a standard. Separate issue: it seems those switches might force a prune, based on a timeout. My goal is to force a prune on every Reject action. Seems those switches won't do that.