[11:47:22] <Pavan>	 Hi, Can anyone help me out regarding this ticket. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T188091
[11:48:16] <Pavan>	 Because of little miscommunication between organizers, we could only get the details in 11th hour. If someone can help us out, then it will be of great help
[11:48:32] <Pavan>	 Thanks in advance
[12:17:19] <andre__>	 Pavan: how to "help out"? What is the ticket about?
[12:17:41] <andre__>	 Garrr. Left already, alright.
[15:21:13] <TheDaveRoss>	 is there a magic word or something which will present the lua memory usage for a page on that page?
[21:40:31] <legoktm>	 TheDaveRoss: no, but it's embedded as an HTML content
[23:06:21] <marlier>	 I should probably know this, but don't: is there boilerplate Apache 2.0 header text for source files on WMF utilities/etc?
[23:20:30] <Reedy>	 marlier: shouldn't need anything WMF specific...
[23:21:05] <marlier>	 Reedy: thanks
[23:30:34] <Ivy>	 bd808: Heh, I was still editing.
[23:32:03] <Ivy>	 Our edit conflict resolution workflow is still master-class, btw.
[23:32:21] <Ivy>	 Two browser tabs and some prayer.
[23:32:35] <bd808>	 Ivy: patches welcome as they say ;)
[23:33:11] <Ivy>	 bd808: https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Review_queue&diff=2723090&oldid=2723089
[23:33:23] <Ivy>	 I'll leave the "should" for now, I guess, but I am actively against lots of feature flags.
[23:33:31] <Ivy>	 Which I think is aligned with the general consensus.
[23:33:44] <Ivy>	 It's more code paths, more complexity, etc.
[23:34:21] <Ivy>	 Having sane defaults is preferable, which is why I thought "can" was better. I'm familiar with the RFC, ofc.
[23:34:57] <Ivy>	 Anyway, those edits are my patches for today. :P