[15:06:43] <Reception123>	 Is there any ETA on the 1.30 release? Would it be early November or late November?
[15:36:00] <bd808>	 Reception123: the Foundation wikis are well into the 1.31.0-wmf.X series and the 1.30 blocker board is almost empty <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/board/2738/>
[15:36:24] <bd808>	 but really only no_justification knows when a release will actually happen :)
[15:42:55] <no_justification>	 That's a good question! Probably mid/late-November
[15:43:56] <Reception123>	 Ok. Thanks :)
[15:44:09] <Reception123>	 Hopefully it's not delayed like 1.29
[15:46:24] <no_justification>	 I'm not thinking it will be...the blocking bugs last time were pretty nasty.
[15:47:21] <Reception123>	 Yeah.. there were a lot of them too 
[16:04:17] <reza1615>	 when i want to open https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%DA%98%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%BE%D9%84_%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AA%D8%B1
[16:04:24] <reza1615>	 it shows this error
[16:04:33] <reza1615>	 Request from 79.127.86.144 via cp1054 cp1054, Varnish XID 569513242 Error: 503, Backend fetch failed at Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:00:17 GMT
[16:07:45] <paladox>	 hi, i've reported it in -operations as going to that link, i get the same error
[16:11:23] <paladox>	 reza1615 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T178632
[16:12:20] <bawolff>	 paladox: why do you neccesarily think that this is the same error as reza1615 ?
[16:12:49] <reza1615>	 bawolff: I didn't say any thing :)
[16:12:50] <paladox>	 bawolff i was told by hoo in wikimedia-operations
[16:12:50] <paladox>	 [17:09:57]  <hoo>	paladox: That is https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T178632
[16:12:56] <bawolff>	 oh, ok
[16:12:57] <reza1615>	 I said It doesn't open
[16:16:04] <hoo>	 reza1615: Basically, the error makes PHP fail "so hard" that it doesn't even manage to tell you there's a problem
[16:16:15] <hoo>	 that's why you get the more generic 503 error page
[16:17:14] <reza1615>	 hoo: thanks for your reply. If it is possible I can delete it
[16:18:54] <pajz>	 Hi, what may be the reason why a dewiki user sub-page contains the __NOINDEX__ magic word, but still is being indexed (there's no noindex tag in the page source)?
[16:19:59] <reza1615>	 I deleted it now I can not recreat or undelete!
[16:20:15] <reza1615>	 recreate 
[16:21:00] <reza1615>	 I got it. it has problem with content
[16:21:30] <no_justification>	 pajz: Maybe it was indexed prior to __NOINDEX__ being added and the search engine hasn't purged it yet?
[16:22:28] <reza1615>	 I can not use that content on other pages!
[16:22:43] <reza1615>	 we should check which part of the content makes this bug
[16:23:03] <pajz>	 no_justification, maybe, but https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer:Schwalson/congatec&action=info also says indexing by search engines is permitted.
[16:24:41] <pajz>	 I really don't understand why, particularly given that, on dewiki, the user namespace should be "noindex" by default anyhow (as far as I know).
[16:26:03] <no_justification>	 __INDEXIEREN__ && __NICHT_INDEXIEREN__ both listed?
[16:26:16] <no_justification>	 I think __INDEX__ overrides __NOINDEX__
[16:26:55] <no_justification>	 __NOINDEX__ at the top, __INDEXIEREN__ near the bottom
[16:27:30] <pajz>	 Oh! I didn't see that.
[16:28:39] <pajz>	 no_justification, yeah, that seems to have fixed the issue. Thanks a lot!
[16:28:46] <no_justification>	 yw!
[16:31:14] <reza1615>	 it is strange it has problem with this text
[16:31:14] <reza1615>	 ''{{گفتاورد|foo}}''
[16:31:31] <reza1615>	 it dosen't have any problem with {{گفتاورد|foo}}
[16:31:49] <reza1615>	 may it is related to new render engine
[16:34:32] <snitch>	 [[Tech]]; 119.160.118.191; [none]; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=17360736&oldid=17333010&rcid=10758414
[16:34:44] <snitch>	 [[Tech]]; Tegel; Reverted changes by [[Special:Contributions/119.160.118.191|119.160.118.191]] ([[User talk:119.160.118.191|talk]]) to last version by Malyacko; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=17360738&oldid=17360736&rcid=10758416