[07:55:45] LoginNotify seems a little too eager. Got a bot that logs in once per day at 07:30 UTC from the same IP, and every day for the past 15 days I've gotten a warning email. [18:55:49] Are there anyone of the people behind the new RecentChanges in the channel? I have a bit weird error report. [18:58:34] Guest18661, https://mediawiki.org/wiki/How_to_report_a_bug [18:58:52] errr, sorry. jeblad: ^ [18:59:47] I know how to write a bug, problem is there are very little to go on [19:03:11] well, go on anyway? [19:03:32] there is probably someone familiar with it here. or we can find them later and forward your comments [19:03:35] …let's go on baby… #singing [19:04:00] * jeblad writes a very lousy bug report [19:16:41] If anyone would check it out T178191 [19:16:41] T178191: The filters on RecentChanges resets when the user clicks outside the drop down menu - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T178191 [20:47:54] An apparent template parameter seems to have higher priority than a magic word. For instance: {{User talk:{{PAGENAME}}}} gives a different magic word than {{{{PAGENAME}}/stuff}} [20:49:08] How can I force the transclusion, meaning how can I force the apparent template parameter to be ignored? [20:50:36] what template parameter ? [20:51:23] [[Tech]]; Banaticus; /* How do I force a magic word-based transclusion instead of a template parameter? */ new section; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=17326027&oldid=17324046&rcid=10693560 [20:51:42] [[Tech]]; Banaticus; /* How do I force a magic word-based transclusion instead of a template parameter? */ signed comment; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=17326031&oldid=17326027&rcid=10693565 [20:51:56] Banaticus: ping [20:54:31] thedj: {{PAGENAME}} is supposed to be: Full page title (including all subpage levels) without the namespace. [20:55:21] But trying to transclude {{{{PAGENAME}}/stuff}} gives Template:PAGENAME/stuff -- it includes the namespace, which is different from {{User talk:{{PAGENAME}}}} where the result is: User talk:PAGENAME [20:55:21] Does {{:{{PAGENAME}}/stuff}} work? [20:55:34] let me go check :) [20:56:09] Yes, thanks AntiComposite :) [20:57:21] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words#Transclusion_modifiers [20:57:23] :) [20:57:45] [[Tech]]; Base; /* How do I force a magic word-based transclusion instead of a template parameter? */; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=17326040&oldid=17326031&rcid=10693581 [21:02:43] [[Tech]]; Banaticus; /* How do I force a magic word-based transclusion instead of a template parameter? */ solved; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=17326055&oldid=17326040&rcid=10693607 [21:07:34] Is it possible to disable a single section's edit link? https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Section_editing#Enabling_and_disabling_section_links suggests that the only way to disable a section's edit link is to (in one way or another) hide all edit section links [21:11:37] Banaticus, https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Editing_sections_of_included_templates is the workaround [21:12:58] Thanks -- I put ;Notes instead of ==Notes== on the primary page and it displays just fine now :) [21:19:16] Banaticus: i think the edit links won't be generated if you use

instead of ==…== [21:19:33] (but it will still act as a section heading in all other ways, e.g. it will appear in the table of contents) [21:21:11] Yeah, using also can cause accessibility issues for readers with screen readers.

will generate the necessary markup for that to work. (Actually, it is the necessary markup.) [21:22:02] In a private wiki, I'm adding an auto transctription of the talk pages to the infobox template, so I want edit links on the transcluded page -- I just don't want them on the header over that transcluded part (and all of this is in the infobox template) [21:25:52] *transcription [21:28:45] MatmaRex: removed 17kB of unused navigation popups code today :) [21:28:58] :o neat [21:29:07] what was it? IE6 support and such? [21:29:16] most of it was MD5 [21:30:01] used for previewing files and math, but it never used that code in preview (EVER!) [21:30:18] like for 15 years everyone downloaded that for naught :) [21:30:48] ok 11 years. still. [21:32:55] i'm seeing if i can weed that thing down a bit. than maybe at some point it might be understandable enough to either fix or reimplement some day.