[10:44:39] anyone good with the abuse filter around? [10:46:01] srdjan_m: define good.. [10:46:31] being able to make a filter that prevents new users from delete a certain template? [10:46:35] *deleting [10:47:08] sure can, what's the template? And how new? Not confirmed? [10:47:51] This one https://bs.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%A0ablon:Brisanje and I was thinking not confirmed and maybe having less than 50 edits overall. [10:48:40] srdjan_m: is that template only used in a certain namespace? [10:49:54] It's mainly used in the main namespace. I don't think I've seen it elsewhere. [10:50:32] It also has an Englsih redirect https://bs.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%A0ablon:Delete which would be good to include in that filter, I reckon. [10:52:04] https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/vIXnAYu7/ [10:52:11] srdjan_m: ^ [10:53:51] srdjan_m: are you a sysop on bswp? [10:54:05] TheresNoTime: Yep, I'll add it in a sec. Thanks. :) [10:54:38] Good stuff, be sure to test it against some examples and log only for a bit etc [11:07:10] TheresNoTime: Hm... what if the edit I want to test the filter on is on page that has been deleted? [11:07:26] *on a page [11:08:00] hmm... given the template that's rather likely [11:08:18] the test won't work... I guess you'd need to try to find an instance that is yet to be deleted [11:09:01] Hm... What if I temporarily restore the page for testing? [11:10:20] I guess that would work :) you could always change the namespace to 2 (Userspace) and test it there as an IP? [11:10:53] Hm... I restored the page but it's not showing up in the thingy.. [11:10:59] The examine past edits page [11:11:59] This is the one I'm trying to run through the filter. https://bs.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MNK_%C4%86aze&diff=2831548&oldid=2831498 [11:12:17] oh duh [11:12:40] `removed_lines irlike "{{Šablon:Brisanje|{{Šablon:Delete"` should be `removed_lines irlike "{{Brisanje|{{Delete"` [11:13:11] That was my bad [11:14:48] no biggie. i changed it [11:15:28] any difference? :) [11:16:09] I'll give it a go as an IP :) [11:20:46] Yep, it prevented me from deleting it. :) [11:23:53] Awesome :) [11:24:49] TheresNoTime: Oh, oh, I think I wanna set up another. [11:25:08] I'm not sure what could be set-up for edits like these: https://bs.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plavi_kit&diff=prev&oldid=2831743 [11:25:54] I don't know if you see what was changed or not, but that user and his socks have been on a rampage of adding the object replacement character. [11:25:58] http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/fffc/index.htm [11:26:16] srdjan_m: just the ORC? ? [11:26:28] filtering just that is rather simple :) [11:26:38] Well, sometimes they add useless line breaks and stuff. [11:26:50] But for the most part it's the OR character. [11:28:49] srdjan_m: I'll PM you [11:29:00] okie-doke [15:20:55] [[Tech]]; 113.166.127.235; /* Canada */ new section; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=17009735&oldid=17003053&rcid=10147546 [15:21:45] [[Tech]]; Reedy; Undo revision 17009735 by [[Special:Contributions/113.166.127.235|113.166.127.235]] ([[User talk:113.166.127.235|talk]]); https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=17009740&oldid=17009735&rcid=10147551 [15:21:48] I could really just do with rollback on meta [16:51:17] Reedy: I don't think meta has rb I think you need the global roll back for it. [16:52:35] Just give myself local admin then ;P [20:56:45] question on enwiki does #invoke need subst'd? [21:04:16] no [21:04:30] why are you asking? [21:04:56] Zppix, ^ [21:05:20] was using wpcleaner and it acted like it needed to [21:07:11] Zppix, if it detected an {{#invoke}} in mainspace, that should definitely be replaced with a template, but there's no technical requirement to subst invokes like talk page templates [21:10:34] k