[04:28:12] dong poop crap [04:30:12] c, hi [04:30:15] im here too lol [04:30:19] !ops ^ [04:30:26] lol [08:39:49] ghaberek: good [19:27:24] [[Tech]]; 2A02:1812:2533:8A00:CD87:2A57:E0A0:90A2; /* à) */ new section; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=16957697&oldid=16952541&rcid=10020558 [19:51:56] [[Tech]]; Stryn; Reverted changes by [[Special:Contributions/2A02:1812:2533:8A00:CD87:2A57:E0A0:90A2|2A02:1812:2533:8A00:CD87:2A57:E0A0:90A2]] ([[User talk:2A02:1812:2533:8A00:CD87:2A57:E0A0:90A2|talk]]) to last version by Matiia; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=16957723&oldid=16957697&rcid=10020639 [23:24:59] anyone here with knowledge about VisualEditor and Citoid? Or are everyone out in the sun… or on barbecue parties in the night… [23:35:14] jeblad I'm in the sun on my laptop BBQing Ribs [23:38:13] O_O [23:38:56] Okey… It is about a change in the Cite dialog sequence [23:40:01] Now an additional step to select the template is always present, but earlyer it was not if there was only a single template [23:40:33] A user at nowiki makes a complaint, he want the old behavior [23:41:18] I have no preference, but it could be nice to know why the change was made [23:41:30] T169475 [23:41:31] T169475: The dialog sequence for citoid has an additional step for selecting the cite template - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T169475