[07:55:58] [[Tech]]; ArchiverBot; Bot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 30 days) to [[Tech/Archives/2017]].; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=16371309&oldid=16360500&rcid=9075522 [11:37:57] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T52832 "I've been able to page through all the 256,165 disambiguation pages on the English Wikipedia" but when I try, it only shows me 10,000. [14:08:56] Hey, is any sysop of test.wikipedia around? [14:09:15] I've just had a strange behaviour with flow. Opened mediawiki.org a few minutes ago and the message box told me "new messages from another wiki" (alike this, was different language). The different wiki was test.wikipedia which I've last edited 9th Feb. Going to test.wikipedia it didn't have any new notifications, just two I've definitely already read (you just made first/tenth edit) when I was last there. However I noticed that the pages I've [14:09:15] edited were deleted. [14:11:35] I'm wondering if I maybe got the notification because the pages were edited before they were deleted. So my guess is somebody edited the page, I got the notification, but when I came to testwiki the page was already deleted and thus the notification wasn't shown locally. However if that's not the case this might be a bug. Would be great if somebody could clarify. [21:17:09] https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/removing_everything_from_github/ [21:20:37] what a mess [22:27:53] Nemo_bis: after reading the full tos, I think joey misunderstood it [22:29:11] (disclaimer, I haven't read the linked Thorsten analysis, since mirbsd.org is apparently down) [22:29:21] but it's all quite standard [22:29:51] Platonides: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/michaelmrose/3f9b655fde540516ed41fdb0041da2df/raw/e12dac7491e42e0d8801e57e45d23b06b61ef772/gistfile1.txt is a mirror of what Thorsten said [22:40:23] hmm [22:40:25] he has a point [22:41:50] although a point is that the moral rights are only waived for github [22:42:21] interesting question wether you can post content for which you can't waive such rights because you never owned them [22:44:35] it's fun that D.5 may be a problem for FOSS licenses but only because it's a subset of what the license already grants [22:45:32] D.4 shouldn't be an issue for the typical FOSS license [22:46:09] since I could "give" github all such rights under the terms of the original license [22:48:12] the problem may be the use of the word "grant"