[00:09:02] <Debra>	 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/19 certainly has a "Block the user and/or IP address from editing" checkbox.
[00:09:38] <Debra>	 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/48 is a public filter with block enabled.
[00:09:42] <Debra>	 I guess mediawiki.org is a special wiki.
[00:10:57] <Platonides>	 yes
[00:13:36] <Dereckson>	 mediawiki.org shares the same configuration style than wikipedia, only wikitech. is really special
[00:14:12] <Platonides>	 Dereckson: "special" as having in case 'mediawikiwiki':
[00:14:17] <Platonides>	                 $wgAbuseFilterActions['block'] = true;
[00:14:40] <Dereckson>	 cawiki too
[00:14:46] <Dereckson>	 en.wikinews
[00:14:51] <Dereckson>	 es.wikibooks
[00:14:59] <Dereckson>	 es.wikivoyage oO
[00:15:06] <Dereckson>	 it.wiki
[00:15:11] <Dereckson>	 it.wikinews
[00:15:16] <Dereckson>	 meta
[00:15:32] <Dereckson>	 actually, it seems the majority of wikis in wmf-config/abusefilter.php have it
[00:15:52] <Platonides>	 well, what else would need special configuration related to abusefilter?
[00:16:46] <Dereckson>	 If you wish it on es.wikipedia, you only have to discuss it locally, gather a consensus, then fill a task like this one: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T57868
[00:20:07] <Platonides>	 I know, I know…
[00:20:13] <Platonides>	 but I won't be redacting it this night
[12:32:39] <Srdjan_m>	 Is it possible to track the uses of classes for wikitables or templates? For example, I want to keep track of every template that uses the class "infobox_v2".
[12:35:38] <Srdjan_m>	 Well, classes in wikitables, I should say.
[13:12:21] <ShoeHex>	 Srdjan_m: You'd have to do a DB dump to get that information.
[13:14:00] <Srdjan_m>	 Hmm... I suppose the best thing I could do right now is just to do a search for 'insource:"infobox v2" '.
[13:15:29] <Srdjan_m>	 Unless there's a better way to find the templates using CirrusSearch.
[13:24:18] <ShoeMaker>	 If you just want to see what pages use a certain template, you could always just use Special:WhatLinksHere
[13:27:17] <Srdjan_m>	 Yeah, but I want to find the template that use a specific class.
[13:27:26] <Srdjan_m>	 *templates
[15:15:35] <Nemo_bis>	 Is it expected to have "unknown object" rows in the task graph? https://web.archive.org/web/20160823151456/https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124314
[15:30:23] <MatmaRex>	 it is possible if a task has been destroyed
[15:31:25] <andre__>	 In this case, looks like tasks that have restricted access
[15:54:27] <Nemo_bis>	 These are probably procurement tasks
[15:54:57] <Nemo_bis>	 It's not a secret that they exist, so it's not a big deal to have them listed, but I'm not sure it's known 
[16:17:49] <greg-g>	 Nemo_bis: it's known, at long as you can't see anything about them (which space they're in, for instance)
[16:18:00] <greg-g>	 s/at long/as long/
[16:21:14] <Nemo_bis>	 ok
[16:51:38] <DanielK_WMDE>	 Can someone remind me under which conditions VARCHAR columns get rewritten to VARBINARY columns? And whether this is still the case on the live sites? Is this controleld by $wgDBmysql5?
[16:58:54] <DanielK_WMDE>	 Or more conretely: why is wb_terms.term_text varbinary on the live system, if it's declared varchar in the installer?...
[17:15:59] <legoktm>	 greg-g: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/306247/
[17:19:20] <greg-g>	 legoktm: ?
[17:19:37] <legoktm>	 that patch is for you :P
[17:21:56] <DanielK_WMDE>	 greg-g, legoktm: do you know when and why varchar fields turn into varbinary fields during deployment?
[17:22:28] <legoktm>	 uh
[17:22:30] <legoktm>	 I do not...
[17:23:47] <DanielK_WMDE>	 i seem to recall that if you choose the "binary collation" option in the installer, the field declarations would change... but i see no code for that
[17:24:09] <DanielK_WMDE>	 many fields that are varchar in tables.sql are varbinary on the live system, it seems
[17:24:40] <DanielK_WMDE>	 page_title, for example
[17:29:39] <greg-g>	 legoktm: ooohhhh! after I actually finish reading the commit msg
[17:30:18] <greg-g>	 DanielK_WMDE: I don't, would have to ask someone in -releng or -operations
[17:44:35] <DanielK_WMDE>	 greg-g: i'll ask jcrespo when he comes on
[19:55:55] <kaldari>	 halfak: I turned on the ORES beta feature on en.wiki, but I don't see any revisions highlighted (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&limit=500). Am I missing something or are their just no bad edits in the list?
[19:57:38] <halfak>	 kaldari, seems to be working for others. I wonder if something is conflicting. 
[19:57:51] <halfak>	 kaldari, you could try clicking "Hide good edits" on the top
[19:58:59] <kaldari>	 halfak: I do see red "r"s. Is that the indicator? I thought it would be highlighted.
[20:00:19] <halfak>	 kaldari, you should see both
[20:00:34] <halfak>	 Are you sure you turned it on?
[20:00:37] <halfak>	 :S
[20:01:43] <halfak>	 Oh!  Yeah.  The red "r"
[20:01:52] <halfak>	 I guess the change that highlights the row is missing for some reason. 
[20:05:33] <kaldari>	 halfak: when I turned off "Group changes by page" it works.
[20:05:56] <halfak>	 I see.  Enhanced RC must affect the highlighting
[20:06:46] <kaldari>	 Yep
[20:10:54] <Luke081515>	 Hi, I want to use action=query&list=categorymembers at API. Is there a way to exclude redirects?
[20:20:16] <Cam|Class>	 🍎 <--- Does that actually show up as an apple?
[20:20:27] <Luke081515>	 I see a nice box :D
[20:20:31] <Cam|Class>	 :(
[20:20:36] <Luke081515>	 but yep
[20:20:39] <Luke081515>	 when I copy it
[20:20:49] <Luke081515>	 my client shows always boxes, but outside...
[20:28:03] <andre__>	 I see an apple.
[20:28:14] <andre__>	 Welcome to Unicode.
[21:41:55] <quiddity>	 Cam|Class Luke081515 for reliability, download Symbola from http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/ for support for these. (the font/link is recommended at http://unicode.org/resources/fonts.html )