[01:09:01] [[Tech]]; Brion VIBBER; /* Windows Wikipedia App Compatibility Issue */; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=15851331&oldid=15844690&rcid=8164930 [10:08:42] [[Tech]]; 119.157.139.136; [none]; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=15851907&oldid=15851331&rcid=8165836 [16:02:54] [[Tech]]; Matiia; Reverted changes by [[Special:Contributions/119.157.139.136|119.157.139.136]] ([[User talk:119.157.139.136|talk]]) to last version by Brion VIBBER; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=15852410&oldid=15851907&rcid=8166557 [21:14:49] Found a quirk : when put into a mediwiki page generates output of -
[21:14:58] which means the styles aren't rendered [21:15:14] So how do you put in styles that use selectors? [21:18:26] Oh glorious members of tech-cabal, Please educate a lowly user on how to do things :) [21:23:11] ShakespeareFan00: I like the Platonides suggestion to edit directyl common.css [21:23:32] This is for a single rather specifc instance [21:23:51] https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Cowie%27s_Printer%27s_pocket-book_and_manual.djvu/65 [21:24:19] To me it would be nicer to actually fix the parser so it doesen't recode the { and } . [21:24:40] And then I could use the nth-child slectors as CSS was DESIGNED to [21:24:48] rather than having to work around quirks [21:25:34] I must have a knack for finding diabologically perverse test cases :( [21:25:47] Like Tablecrux in LST ( see Wikisource) [21:26:48] Yes I could ask for it to be in Common.css , but for a single table in a single work that seems like over-kill [21:29:15] AFAIK we don't support that level of styling directly in page wikitext, you would need to do something higher such as Mediawiki:Common.css if you wanted it